Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Bhawani Singh Vs. Indian Council of Social Science Research and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.5051/2000 16th December, 2013 SHRI BHAWANI SINGH Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Amrit Pal S. Gambhir and Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocates. VERSUS INDIAN COUNCIL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner prays for the relief of being granted promotion to the post of Assistant Director in the respondent no.1organisation. Petitioner has been working from 9.10.1991 as a Research Assistant.2. Petition itself specifies the recruitment rule for the post of Assistant Director and the same reads as under:1.Name of the post Assistant Director 2.Group V3No.of posts 7 4. Scale of Pay Rs.700-40-900-EB-40-1100-50-1300.5. Age for direct recruitment. Minimum 21 Maximum 45 6. Educational and other A masters degree with 50% marks in any of the qualifications required...
M/S. Sms Realtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Burfi Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 16, 2013 + RC.REV. 434/2013 M/S SMS REALTECH PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjiv K. Jha, Adv. versus SMT BURFI DEVI Through ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present revision petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the eviction order dated 24th May, 2013 passed against the petitioner by the ARC, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present petition are that the respondent filed an eviction petition against the petitioner under Section 14(1) (e) read with Section 25B of the Act in respect of one godown/shop situated at H.No.214, Ward No.8, Ground Floor, Gali Loharan, Ajmeri Gate, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted premises).3. It was stated in the eviction petition that the tenanted premises is requi...
Li and Fung India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:08. 07.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:16. 12.2013 % + ITA3062012 LI AND FUNG INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Jain, Mr. Manish Kanth and Mr. Ramit Katyal, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Ruchesh Sinha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT1 The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the IT Act) impugns the order dated 30.09.2011 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Branch D, New Delhi (hereafter the Tribunal) in ITA No.5156/Del/2010, for the assessment year 2006-07. The present appeal concerns the alleged apportioning of consideration between the Appellant (i.e. the assessee, M/s Li Fung (India) Pvt. Ltd, hereinafter LFIL) and its Associated Enterprise (hereinafter AE) in order to arrive at the ...
Rama Associates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. D.D.A./M.C.D. (Slum Wing)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
* + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.S. (O.S.) No.1633/1983 Date of Decision:16. 12.2013 .Plaintiff RAMA ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Mr. Ramesh Vats, Advs for the plaintiff Versus D.D.A./M.C.D. (SLUM WING) Through: ....Defendant Dr. K.S Sidhu, Sr. Adv, with Ms. Maldeep Singh, Adv for the defendant/DDA CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for recovery of Rs. 60,79,875/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization. A brief summary of the facts leading to the instant suit is as follows:2. Delhi Development Authority (DDA), the defendant, held a public auction on March 12, 1982, for sale of a commercial plot admeasuring 351 sq. yds at No.9, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi (suit property). Rama Associates, the plaintiff participated in the auction and being the highest bidder at Rs. 186 lakhs, its bid was accepted on March 20, 1982.In accordance with t...
M/S Pragati Construction Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S (OS) Nos. 993/1983 Date of Decision:16. 12.2013 M/S PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CO. Through: ......Plaintiff Mr. Amit Prabhat Deshpande, Adv. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: ......Defendant Dr. K.S Sidhu, Sr. Adv with Ms. Maldeep Sidhu, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. The instant suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of a sum of Rs 48,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Eight Lakhs Only) from the defendant (hereinafter referred to as the DDA) along with damages to the tune of Rs 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) and also for declaration that Clause 2(iv) of the terms and conditions of the auction is non-est and void in law. The plaintiff also prays for interest at the rate of 22% on the decreed amount from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realisation of the amount.2. The plaintiffs case is that around the first week of March, 1982, they came to know of an auction notice relating to an auction to...
M/S. Pnr Capital Service Ltd. Vs. Jeanne Christian Educational Society ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2128/1995, IA66672011 Date of Decision:16. 12.2013 M/S. PNR CAPITAL SERVICE LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Amrita Singh, Adv. Versus JEANNE CHRISTIAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Jay Savla, Ms Amrita Mishra and Ms. Shilpi Chawdhary, Advs. for D-1 to 3 and 5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this suit against the defendants for recovery of Rs.34,54,101/- along with interest @ 3% per month.2. The plaintiff is a company engaged in the business of leasing, letting on higher-purchase, financing etc. The defendant No.1 is a registered society of which defendant No.2 is a public school. Defendant No.3 (now since deceased) was the Principal of the school and defendant No.5 is the Chairman of the Society and also Manager of the school. Defendant No.3 is stated to be the guarantor along with defendant No.4 of the loans given by the plaintiff to defendants No.1 and 2. The pla...
Shanti Devi Vs. Delhi Transco Ltd. Dvb Emp. Ter. Benefits Fund
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2619/2004 % December 16, 2013 SHANTI DEVI ......Petitioner Through: None VERSUS DELHI TRANSCO LTD. DVB EMP. TER. BENEFITS FUND ...... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner seeks directions for being issued to the respondent no.3, which is the successor entity of the erstwhile-employer, for granting of benefit of the pension scheme.2. The facts of the case are that petitioners husband Sh. Ram Sagar Sharma was working from 1964 with Delhi Electricity Supply Undertaking, and thereafter with Delhi Vidyut Board, till he died on 11.2.1992 in harness.3. Petitioner claims that she being a dependent/legal heir of the deceased was entitled to benefit of the office order dated 22.8.1992 for getting the benefit of the pension scheme on deposit of CPF contribution and compliance of other formalities. The relevant ...
Sardar Avtar Singh Vs. Amarjeet Kaur Gandhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 16, 2013 + FAO122003 SARDAR AVTAR SINGH Through ..... Appellant Ms.Payal Jain, Adv. versus AMARJEET KAUR GANDHI Through None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for setting aside the impugned order dated 7th December, 2002 wherein the learned ADJ dismissed the petition of the appellant for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act.2. On 26th September, 1971 the parties were married according to Hindu (sikh) rites. Out of this wedlock, two male issues were born namely Manpreet Singh born on 27th February, 1974 and Gurpreet Singh born on 5th March, 1977.3. It was the case of the appellant before the learned Trial Court that during her stay with the appellant, the respondent treated the appellant with cruelty and denied/refused to co-habitat with the app...
Mayank Pandey Vs. State and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2206/2013 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2013 MAYANK PANDEY ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pramod Saxena, APP for State. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 for quashing of FIR No.100/2013 dated 13.03.2013 under Section 376 IPC registered at PS Malviya Nagar, District South, New Delhi.2. The ground for quashing of the aforesaid FIR is that the matter has been compromised. The petitioner and respondent No.2 are living happily as husband and wife. Marriage certificate along with marriage photographs have been placed on record.3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and have gone through the record.4. The main contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the pet...
Radical Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pharmaceutical Employees Co-ope ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
$~R-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2013 + CS(OS) 1339/2009 RADICAL BUILDERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Versus PHARMACEUTICAL EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. ..... Defendant Advocates appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff: Mr Shiv Khorana & Mr Abhishek Sharma, Advs. For the Defendant: Mr.B.S. Arora, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J (ORAL) CS(OS) 1339/2009 & IA No.15559/2009 (Objections) 1. The plaintiff before me, i.e., Radical Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. (RBIPL) has filed the captioned suit under Sections 14, 17 and 29 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short the 1940 Act) seeking a direction from this court that the award dated 03.07.2009, passed by the learned sole arbitrator, be made a rule of the court and a decree be passed in terms of the award with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of the decree till its actual payment.2. As against this, the defendant has filed...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »