Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Veer Arjun Newspaper Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bahori Lal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2013 % + RFA246/2003 VEER ARJUN NEWSPAPER PVT.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhry, Advocate. Versus BAHORI LAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 16th November, 2002 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge, Delhi in Suit No.62/99 filed by the respondent no.1 for recovery from the appellant and the respondents no.2&3 of damages of Rs.5 lacs on account of defamation) of recovery of Rs.1 lac against the appellant and the respondent no.3 Chief Editor, Dainik Public Asia and in addition directing the appellant and the respondent no.3 to publish the rebuttal of articles dated 4th May, 1998, 15th April, 1998 and 17th April, 1998 published in their respective newspapers, in the form of unconditional apology on the front pages of their respective newspapers at a conspicuous place.2. T...
Rajender Prasad Surinder Kumar Vs. the Assistance Commissioner Food an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on:17. 12.2013 [1].+ W.P.(C) 948/2008 & CM. no.1863/2008 RAJENDER PRASAD SURINDER KUMAR Through: Mr.Nitin Sehgal, Advocate versus ..... Petitioner THE ASSISTANCE COMMISSIONER FOOD & SUPPLIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan and Mr.Neeraj Chaudhary, Advocates for respondents [2]. W.P.(C) 5157/2008 & CM.No.9860/2008 AGGARWAL STORE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Pradeep Gupta and Mr.Suresh Bharti, Advocates for petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan and Mr.Neeraj Chaudhary, Advocates for respondents [3]. W.P.(C) 8386/2007 & CM No.15850/2007 MAHENDER KUMAR Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr.Anurag Mangla, Advocate GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan and Mr.Neeraj Chaudhary, Advocates for respondents [4]. W.P.(C) 8478/2007 SHOBHA KUMARI Through: versus W.P.(C) 948/2008 & ors. ..... Petitioner THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DE...
Uoi and ors. Vs. J.P. Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.11881/2009 & CM No.12008/2009 Date of decision :17. h December, 2013 ..... Petitioners UOI & ORS. Through Mr.R.V. Sinha, Adv. with Mr.P.K. Singh, Adv. versus J.P. SINGH Through ..... Respondent Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 19th November, 2008 passed in OA No.1690 of 2007 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. By this judgment, the Central Administrative Tribunal had held that there was unexplained delay and laches in initiating disciplinary proceedings against the present respondent. As a result, by the impugned order, the Tribunal has quashed the memorandum dated 19th May, 2006 whereby the declaration was made by the appointing authority to hold the disciplinary inquiry against the respondent under Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.2. The respondent was an off...
incent Tour P. Ltd. Vs. Dinesh Garg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2013 % + RFA6452004 INCENT TOUR P. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. G.S. Narula & Mr. Ravi Pal, Adv. Versus DINESH GARG Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S.K. Mishra, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 31 st August, 2004 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge, Delhi in Suit No.34/2003 filed by the respondent for recovery of Rs.1,86,000/- from the three appellants i.e. the appellant no.1 Company and its Managing Director Shri P.N. Nageshwaran and its Director Mrs. Meenu Nageshwaran as well as in the counterclaim filed by the appellant no.1 Company for recovery of Rs.4,69,252/- from the respondent) dismissing the counterclaim of the appellant no.1 Company and allowing the suit of the respondent for recovery of Rs.98,000/- with costs and interest from the appellants.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the Trial Court record r...
State Vs. Om Prakash Rana and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on :17. 12.2013 CRL.REV.P. 622/2013 STATE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, APP for State. versus OM PRAKASH RANA & ORS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL ..... Respondents JUDGMENT VEENA BIRBAL, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 16707/2013 (EXEMPTION) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CRL.M.A. 16706/2013 (CONDONATION OF DELAY) In view of the reasoning given, delay in filing the petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 622/2013 1. This criminal revision petition has been filed wherein challenge has been made to judgment dated 12.07.2013 passed by learned ASJ in sessions case No.21/2013 whereby learned ASJ has held that no offence under Section 3(1)(x) of The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, (in short referred to as the SC/ST Act) is made out against the respondents and as such has discharged the respondents.2. The facts relevant for the dispo...
Pushpal Kumar Mishra Vs. Vice Chancellor, Jamia Millia Islamia Univers ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:16.12.2013 WP(C) No.7888 of 2013 & CM No.16738 of 2013 (Stay) PUSHPAL KUMAR MISHRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Binay Kumar, Adv. versus VICE CHANCELLOR, JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY & ANR...... Respondents Through: Ms. Jaya Goyal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court was caught using unfair means in the examination of the paper DPT-307. He was debarred from appearing in any examination of the University for a period of three (3) years vide order dated 27.9.2012. Being aggrieved from the said order, the petitioner filed WP (C) No.3783/2013 inter alia claiming that he had not been given an opportunity of hearing before the said order came to be passed. Vide order dated 30.5.2013, the said writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondent to grant a personal hearing to the petitioner to enable him to explain his stand. A fresh order was to be...
Sidharth Grover Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. No.1918/2013 Reserved on:06. 12.2013 Date of decision:16. 12.2013 IN THE MATTER OF: SIDHARTH GROVER ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Ram Jethmalani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manu Sharma, Mr. P.R. Mala, Mr. Karan Kalia, Mr. Parnav Diesh, Mr. Ali Jethmalani and Mr. Abhir Datt, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with Insp. Rajeev Kumar, PS Safdarjung Enclave. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying inter alia for grant of bail in case FIR No.427/2013 registered under Sections 323/304-II IPC & Sections 155, 3/181 of Motor Vehicles Act at PS Safdarjung Enclave, Delhi.2. The FIR came to be registered on the complaint of one Shri Dushyant, a driver by profession, who had stated that in the morning of 5.9.2013, he had driven down to Phoolwati Jain Charitable Trust Hospital in Safdarjung Develo...
Janak Datwani Vs. C.N.A. Exports Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.1113 of 2007 JANAK DATWANI Through: Mr. Amit Sibhal with Mr. Ayush Agrawal, Advocates. ..... Plaintiff versus C.N.A. EXPORTS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. P.K. Bakshi and Mr. Rajat Navet, Advocates for Defendants 1 and 2. Ms. Tara Ganju, Advocate for Defendant No.5. Ms. Diya Kapur, Advocate for Ms. Nitya Bharaney. AND CS (OS) No.556 of 2008 JAMNA DATWANI AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Tara Ganju, Advocate. versus ANAND DATWANI AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate for Defendant No.2 & 6. Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Advocate for Defendant No.5. Ms. Diya Kapur, Advocate for Ms. Nitya Bharaney. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1612.2013 IA Nos. 10597 of 2011 & 2347 of 2011 in CS (OS) No.556 of 2008 1. IA No.2347 of 2011 is an application under Order I Rule 10 CPC filed by Ms. Sushma Ravidass praying for deletion of her name from the array of parties. IA No.10597 of 2011 is an application seeking...
Aamir Abbas Dev Vs. State Through Nia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. A. 953/2013 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2013 + # ! AAMIR ABBAS DEV . Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Qazi, Advocate versus $ * STATE THROUGH NIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Sharma & Ms. Shilpa Singh Spl. PP for NIA & Mr. Som Prakash, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH ORDER P.K. BHASIN, J: This is an appeal by an accused turned approver against the order dated 5th June,2013 of the Special Court constituted under the National Investigation Agency Act,2008(NIA Act in short) whereby his application for his release from jail, where he was lodged after his arrest for his involvement in the bomb blast which took place on 7 th September,2011 near the reception booth in between entrance gate nos.4 and 5 of Delhi High Court, was dismissed.2. On 7th September, 2011 at about 10.14 a.m. a bomb blast took place near the reception counter between entrance gate nos. 4 and 5 of the Delhi High Court whe...
Rajender @ Rajender Kumar Vs. Raj Bala
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 16, 2013 + RC.REV. 441/2012 & C.M. No.15129/2012 RAJENDER @ RAJENDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Adv. versus RAJ BALA ..... Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present revision petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the eviction order dated 9th February, 2012 passed against the petitioner by the ARC-01, East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present petition are that the respondent filed an eviction petition against the petitioner under Section 14(1) (e) of the Act in respect of one room situated on the ground floor of the property bearing No.P-106, Gali No.6, Shankar Nagar Ext., Delhi-110051 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted premises). It was stated that the tenanted premises was let out for...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »