Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Mahinder Pal Sikri (Deceased) Through ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28.11.2013 + LPA7432013, C.M. APPL. 15879/2013 to 15881/2013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus MAHINDER PAL SIKRI (DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIR MRS. NIKKI CHAWLA ..... Respondent + LPA2982013, C.M. APPL. 7613/2013 TO76142013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI AJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent + LPA3022013, C.M. APPL.7674/2013 TO76752013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI GAURAV GANDHI ..... Respondent + LPA3412013, C.M. APPL.8106/2013 TO81072013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus MR. RATTAN KUMAR ..... Respondent + LPA3422013, C.M. APPL.8111/2013 & 8161/2013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI PRABIR KUMAR BHATTACHRYA..... Respondent + LPA3432013, C.M. APPL.8112/2013 TO81132013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus MR. INDERJEET SINGH TOSARIA ..... Respondent + LPA3452013, C.M. APPL. 8116/2013 & 8117/2013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Mr. Inderjeet Singh Tosaria
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. 11.2013 + LPA2982013, C.M. APPL. 7613/2013 TO76142013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI AJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent + LPA3022013, C.M. APPL.7674/2013 TO76752013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI GAURAV GANDHI ..... Respondent + LPA3412013, C.M. APPL.8106/2013 TO81072013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus MR. RATTAN KUMAR ..... Respondent + LPA3422013, C.M. APPL.8111/2013 & 8161/2013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI PRABIR KUMAR BHATTACHRYA..... Respondent + LPA3432013, C.M. APPL.8112/2013 TO81132013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus MR. INDERJEET SINGH TOSARIA ..... Respondent + LPA3452013, C.M. APPL. 8116/2013 & 8117/2013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI N.K. PURI ..... Respondent + LPA3462013, C.M. APPL.8119/2013 TO81202013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SMT. RAMESHWARI ..... Respondent ...
Dsssb Vs. Vikas Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: November 27, 2013 + WP (C) 3049/2012 RAVINDRA DEVI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Advocate versus GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: November 21, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: November 27, 2013 WP (C) 6485/2011 DSSSB Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate versus VIKAS KUMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.Gowthaman, Advocate with Mr.Paari Vendhan and Ms.Arunima Pal, Advocates Judgment Reserved on: November 21, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: November 27, 2013 WP (C) 6872/2013 PAPPU RAM MEENA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Aditi Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Prateek Sehrawat, Advocate versus DSSSB WP(C) No.3049/2002 & Ors. ..... Respondent Page 1 of 26 Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for GNCTD ...
Gnct of Delhi and ors Vs. Uma Lohani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIz Judgment Reserved on October 28, 2013 Judgment Delivered on November 27, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4391/2010 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate versus RAJA RAM ..... Respondent Represented by: Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr.Raj Kumar Sherawat, Adv. for applicant in C.M No.12433/2013 + W.P.(C) 4899/2011 GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate versus UMA LOHANI Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Ms.Rashmi Chopra, Adv. W.P.(C) 3176/2011 GNCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate versus GOPAL SINGH NEGI Represented by: ..... Respondent Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. These 3 writ petitions involve common issue of law, ...
Sahibjeet Singh Vs. Board of Technical Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.7076 of 2013 SAHIBJEET SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Charanjeet, Mr. S.S. Gulati & Mr. Tarun Satija, Advs. versus BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court was studying in GTB Polytechnic, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi pursuing a three year Diploma Course in Automobile Engineering. The study in the said course consists of six semesters. In the examinations held in December, 2012January, 2013 the petitioner appeared in the fifth semester examination and also re-appeared in two papers of the third semester in which he had failed during regular semester examination. On 14.12.2012, the flying squad of the Board of Technical Education checked the petitioner and found that he was carrying with him a note containing material which wa...
Sajjan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
$~ 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 592/2010 % Judgment dated 27.11.2013 SAJJAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr.P.K. Sharma and Mr.Bakul Jain, Advs versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. for State S.I. Vikas, P.S. Subhash Place. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed against the order of conviction dated 8.3.2010 and order on sentence dated 8.3.2010 by which appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for 7 years along with fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine SI for 4 months punishable under Sections 392/ 34 IPC.2. As per the FIR No.294/1999 lodged at Police Station Saraswati Vihar, under Section 392/397/34 IPC, the appellant was convicted along with three other persons, who committed robbery on 26.4.1999 between 11:00 and 11:15 a.m. upon one Sh.Sushil Aggarwal PW-20, complainant and Mr.Babu Lal, PW-13 of Rs.8.90 lacs on gun point. As per the prosecution, Sushil Aggarwal, was d...
Sh Ashok Kumar Singhal Vs. Smt Bimla Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 11.2013 FAO(OS) 545/2013 SH ASHOK KUMAR SINGHAL ..... Appellant Versus SMT BIMLA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant :Mr A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr Rama Shanker, Mr Shivom Garg, Mrs Kamlesh. For the Respondents: None CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM N o.18795/2013 (exemption) Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 545/2013 & CM Nos. 18793/2013 & 18794/2013 (stay) 1. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 09.10.2013 passed by a learned single Judge in IA No.21606/2012 which was an application filed on behalf of the appellant/plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code (CPC) for amendment of the plaint in CS (OS) No.1778/2007. The learned single Judge has rejected the prayer for amendment of the plaint.2. Earlier, an order was passed by a Divisio...
inderjeet Kaur Kalsi Vs. Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4504/2013 & Crl. M.A.16125/2013 Date of decision :27. h November, 2013 % INDERJEET KAUR KALSI Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Jyotika Kalra, Adv. versus NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA1 JUDGMENT Respondent no.2 instituted a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred as NI Act) against the petitioner in respect of two dishonoured cheques dated 25th February, 2007 for Rs. 5 lakhs and Rs. 6 lakhs respectively. At the stage of complainants evidence, respondent no.2 moved an application dated 19th October, 2012 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 311 Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) for permission to examine K.S. Kohli as a witness on the ground that the respondent had given friendly loan of Rs.11 lakhs to the petitioner in the presence of K.S. Kohli at his office. It ...
S.N.Bhatnagar Vs. the Secretary and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.3394/2000 27th November, 2013 S.N.BHATNAGAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. K.N.Balgopal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. A.P.Mukundam and Mr. T.A.Prakash, Advocates. VERSUS THE SECRETARY AND ANR. Through: ...... Respondents None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Originally when this writ petition was filed two reliefs were claimed, first for reimbursement of medical expenses and second for grant of monetary benefits/idle wages, however, the writ petition was allowed to be amended for seeking further relief in terms of the order of this Court dated 6.11.2000 in CM No.10191/2000. The result of the amendment was that petitioner was allowed to challenge the order dated 16.8.2000 passed by the disciplinary authority imposing the punishment on the petitioner of removal from services.2. The facts of the case are that petitioner was employee of Hindustan Insecticides Ltd, rep...
Lekh Raj Mahar and anr. Vs. Dsssb
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: November 27, 2013 + WP (C) 3049/2012 RAVINDRA DEVI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Advocate versus GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: November 21, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: November 27, 2013 WP (C) 6485/2011 DSSSB Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate versus VIKAS KUMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.Gowthaman, Advocate with Mr.Paari Vendhan and Ms.Arunima Pal, Advocates Judgment Reserved on: November 21, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: November 27, 2013 WP (C) 6872/2013 PAPPU RAM MEENA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Aditi Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Prateek Sehrawat, Advocate versus DSSSB WP(C) No.3049/2002 & Ors. ..... Respondent Page 1 of 26 Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for GNCTD ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »