Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 28 2013

Prof. K.P. Gupta Vs. University of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. 05.2013 Pronounced on:28. 11.2013 + LPA822004 PROF. K.P. GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Sh. Sanjeet Raman, Advocates with the appellant in person. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Anurag Mathur, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This is an unsuccessful writ petitioners appeal, questioning the decision of a learned Single Judge. The impugned judgment dismissed the appellants writ petition, whereby he had challenged the action of the Delhi University (the University) in issuing him a show cause notice pursuant to an Enquiry Report submitted in respect of allegations of his misconduct.2. The facts, briefly, are that the Petitioner was at the relevant time a Professor in the Department of Chinese and Japanese Studies of the University. He had also held the position of Head of LPA822004 Page 1 Depa...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2013

Commissioner of Police Vs. Badal Singh

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2013

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 28, 2013 + WP (C) 5414/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus BADAL SINGH Represented by: .....Respondent Ms.Jasvinder Kaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, at the outset we must express our anguish at the manner in which the administrative wing of the Delhi Police is functioning. The cause of our anguish is the undernoted information provided to us in the writ petition pertaining to the penalties which were imposed upon the respondent:1. CENSURE DATED199.81 FOR NOT WRITING THE CASE DIARY IN CASE FIR NO.424/80 U/S420IPC PS SEEMA PURI.2. CENSURE DATED255.87 FOR SUBMITTING FALSE REPORT IN RESPECT OF PASSPORT VERIFICATION.3. CENSURE DATED911.87 FOR PROCEEDING ON TRANSFER WITHOUT HANDING OVER THE CHARGE....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2013

Narendar Singh and ors. Vs. the Indian Institute of Architects

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 07.2013 Pronounced on:28. 11.2013 + FAO(OS) 64/2013, C.M. APPL. 1784/2013 (for stay) NARENDAR SINGH AND ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Viraj. R. Datar with Mr. Chetan Lokur and Mr. Vikram Pradeep, Advocates. versus THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant claims to be aggrieved by an order rejecting his application for rejection of the Plaintiffs plaint. The appellant shall be hereafter referred to as such or the defendant; the Plaintiff shall be referred to as the plaintiff.2. In 1999, the plaintiff filed a suit against the present Appellant seeking, inter alia, recovery of the plot bearing No.4, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi before the Delhi High Court, as CS (OS) No.1918/1999 (the suit property). The Plaintiff had valued the suit property at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2013

N.C. Bansal Vs. Board of Discipline of Icai

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:28. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.1043 of 2013 N.C. BANSAL Through: ....Petitioner Mr. Sameer Bhatnagar and Mr. N.C. Bansal, Advs. Versus BOARD OF DISCIPLINE OF ICAI ....Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Aggarwal with Mr. Pulkit Agarwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court filed a complaint under Section 21 of the Chartered Accountant (Amendment) Act, 2006, against one Mr. Manoj Gupta, who has not been impleaded as a party to this writ petition. The complaint was examined by the Director (Discipline), in light of the written statement of Mr. Manoj Gupta and the rejoinder filed by the petitioner to the said written statement. The said Director formed a prima facie opinion that Mr. Manoj Gupta was not guilty of professional misconduct, within the meaning of clause (2) of Part-IV of the First Schedule and Clauses (5), (6) & (7) of Part-I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2013

Nandhini M K Vs. Prof Sanjay Srivastava Secretary Medical Council O

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2013

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 900/2013 NANDHINI M K Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Chhindra, Advocate versus PROF SANJAY SRIVASTAVA SECRETARY MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This contempt petition is predicated on the alleged non-compliance of the orders passed by this Court on 09.10.2013 whilst disposing off the petitioners W.P.(C) No.5178/2013, wherein the following directions were issued:The writ petition is accordingly allowed and the respondent-Medical Council of India is directed to consider grant of provisional registration and the issue Eligibility Certificate, if required and take an appropriate decision on it within four (4) weeks from today. The writ petition and the application stand disposed of. 2. Issue notice to the respondent to show cause as to why proceedings in contempt be not initiated against him.3. ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2013

Whale Stationery Products Ltd. Vs. Kores C.E. Gmbh and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 328 of 2011 WHALE STATIONERY PRODUCTS LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta & Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocates. versus KORES C.E. GMBH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Samridh Bhardwaj, Advocate for Defendant No.1 Mr. Amit Jain, Mr. J.R. Dhanger and Mr. Nipun Khandelwal, Advocates for Defendant No.2 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER2811.2013 IA No.10591 of 2013 (Order VII Rule 11 CPC) 1. This is an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by Defendant No.1 seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the suit.2. The background to this application is that the Plaintiff, a part of Whale group of companies having its office in New Delhi, is engaged in the manufacture of stationery products. A memo of understanding (MoU) was entered into between the Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 Kores Austria, in October 2006 which was signed by the ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2013

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Smt. Rameshwari

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. 11.2013 + LPA2982013, C.M. APPL. 7613/2013 TO76142013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI AJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent + LPA3022013, C.M. APPL.7674/2013 TO76752013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI GAURAV GANDHI ..... Respondent + LPA3412013, C.M. APPL.8106/2013 TO81072013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus MR. RATTAN KUMAR ..... Respondent + LPA3422013, C.M. APPL.8111/2013 & 8161/2013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI PRABIR KUMAR BHATTACHRYA..... Respondent + LPA3432013, C.M. APPL.8112/2013 TO81132013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus MR. INDERJEET SINGH TOSARIA ..... Respondent + LPA3452013, C.M. APPL. 8116/2013 & 8117/2013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SHRI N.K. PURI ..... Respondent + LPA3462013, C.M. APPL.8119/2013 TO81202013 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SMT. RAMESHWARI ..... Respondent ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2013

Mahendra M Malviya and ors. Vs. Bhagwan Singh T. Rajput and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. t October, 2013 DECIDED ON :28. h November, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2104/2011 & Crl.M.A.Nos.7643/2011 & 7929/2011 MAHENDRA M MALVIYA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.J.K.Singh with Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocates. VERSUS BHAGWAN SINGH T. RAJPUT & ANR. ...... Respondents Through : Ms.Sunita M.Ahuja with Mr.Anil Kant Tripathi, Advocates CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Mahendra M.Malviya (P-1), Nisha S.Rajput (P-2) and Surndra Singh Rajput (P-3) have preferred the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of summoning order dated 01.09.2001 and subsequent proceedings in Criminal Complaint No.1551/1/10 titled as Bhagwan Singh T.Rajput v. Mahendra M.Malviya & Ors., filed under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. In a Complaint Case under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act filed by respondent No.2 before Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahma...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2013