Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Om Parkash Mongia Decd. Thru Lrs. Vs. Sudhir Kapoor and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA No.483/2004 Decided on :11. h November, 2013 OM PARKASH MONGIA DECD. THR. LRS. Through: .... Appellant Mr.Vimal Wadhawan, Advocate. Versus SUDHIR KAPOOR &ORS. .... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI ORDER1111.2013 % CM No.16774/2013 (Restoration) 1. The instant appeal was filed by Mr.O.P.Mongia, deceased, through his wife Smt.Krishna Mongia and Ors. against the judgment and decree passed by the trial court by virtue of which the suit for specific performance filed by the appellant was dismissed. During the pendency of the present appeal, the appellant was not represented and consequently the court was pleased to dismiss the appeal in default on 15.02.2013. The LRs of Sh. O.P.Nangia, since deceased, namely Smt.Krishna Mongia, Ms.Renu Mongia, Ms.Sangeeta Mongia, Ms.Anju Mongia, Ms.Aditya Mongia, Sh.Ashu Mongia and Shri.Vinay Mongia filed an application for restoration of the appeal to its original number. This application was...
Dr. Kewal Krishna Sood Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1762/2013 Reserved on: Date of decision:21. 11.2013 11.12.2013 IN THE MATTER OF: DR. KEWAL KRISHNA SOOD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Pal Singh, Advocate versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP for the CBI with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocate CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.PC for grant of bail in case FIR No.RC.BD1/2009/E/0019 entitled CBI vs. Dr. Kewal Krishna Sood and Others registered under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPC by the CBI at New Delhi.2. The allegations against the petitioner, who is the promoter of a company by the name of M/s Raghubir Hospital Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the hospital), are that he had dishonestly availed of a term loan of 6.50 crores from the State Bank of India (SBI), Commercial Branch, New Delhi for the purpose of setting up a 150 b...
United Spirits Ltd Vs. M/S Stitch Craft (India)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:24. 10.2013/25.10.2013 Date of Decision:08. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 6328/2013 & CM No.13822/2013 M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil K. Jain & Mr. Madhur Jain, Advs. versus INDIAN COUNCIL OF ARBITRATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Mr. Vijender Kumar & Mr. Alif Fazzelboy, Advs. for R-2. + W.P.(C) 4886/2013 UNITED SPIRITS LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M. Dutta, Ms. Neelam Saini & Mr. P. Vinod, Advs. versus M/S STITCH CRAFT (INDIA) Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.Sub-Section (2) of Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act provides that a plea that the Arbitral Tribunal does not have jurisdiction shall be raised not later than the submission of the statement of defence. Sub-section (3) of the aforesaid Section provides that a...
Mohd. Irfan Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :08. h NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 783/2012 & CRL.M.A. 17117/2012 MOHD. IRFAN Through : ..... Appellant Mr.C.Mohan Rao, Advocate with Mr.Trivender Chauhan, Advocate. VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE..... Respondent Through : Mr.Satish Aggarwala, Spl. P.P. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Mohd. Irfan questions the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 26.03.2012 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge, NDPS in Sessions Case No.126/04 by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 21 (c) of the NDPS Act. By an order dated 27.03.2012, he was awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 1 lac. In nutshell, the prosecution case is as under :2. On 07.04.2004, Sh.Raman Mishra, Intelligence Officer received intelligence report at 03.00 P.M. to the effect that Mohd. Irfan aged around 27 years and of wheatish complexion would be carrying around 20 kg na...
Nagaland Industrial Raw Materials and Supply Corpora Vs. Union of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 11.2013 FAO(OS) 230/2013 & CM No.7187/2013 NAGALAND INDUSTRIAL RAW MATERIALS & SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr K.N. Balgopal, Sr. Advocate alongwith Mr Mohit Chadha & Mr T. A. Prakash. : Mr Saqib for UOI. For the Respondents CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 06.03.2013 in IA No.16577 (for condonation of delay of 112 days in re-filing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996). The learned Single Judge had dismissed the said application on the ground that the condonation of delay would amount to granting a relief contrary to the provisions of the said Act.2. Yesterday, this Bench has delivered a judgment in DDA v. M/s Durga Construction C...
M/S Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Indian Council of Arbitration an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:24. 10.2013/25.10.2013 Date of Decision:08. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 6328/2013 & CM No.13822/2013 M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil K. Jain & Mr. Madhur Jain, Advs. versus INDIAN COUNCIL OF ARBITRATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Mr. Vijender Kumar & Mr. Alif Fazzelboy, Advs. for R-2. + W.P.(C) 4886/2013 UNITED SPIRITS LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M. Dutta, Ms. Neelam Saini & Mr. P. Vinod, Advs. versus M/S STITCH CRAFT (INDIA) Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.Sub-Section (2) of Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act provides that a plea that the Arbitral Tribunal does not have jurisdiction shall be raised not later than the submission of the statement of defence. Sub-section (3) of the aforesaid Section provides that a...
M/S. Dammo Enterprises Vs. the Regional Director, Esic
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.510/2002 Decided on :8. h November, 2013 M/s DAMMO ENTERPRISES Through: Appellant Mr.Shiv Charan Garg and Mr.Shashank Mittal, Advocates. Versus THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ESIC Through: Respondents Mr.K.P.Mavi & Mr.B.P.Mishra, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal against the order dated 04.06.2002 passed by Sh.O.P.Saini, the learned Senior Civil Judge, ESIC Judge, Delhi.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the present appellant is a proprietorship concern of one Smt.Daya Wati. It is alleged in the plaint filed by the appellant that it is engaged in the distribution of LPG Gas Cylinders since 06.09.1983. It is alleged that some time in the month of May, 1998, the officials of the respondent came to the premises of the appellant herein and without issuance of any notice to the appellant inspected the factory premises of the appellant. It was stated that the respondent after inspec...
M/S. Pachranga International Pvt. Ltd Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:08. 11.2013 + WP (C) No.6962 of 2013 M/S. PACHRANGA INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover & Ms. Megha Chandra, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joginder Sukhija, CGSC with Mr. Yogesh Yogi, Advs. for R-1. Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) CAV Nos.984-985/2013 Since learned counsel for the caveator/respondent No.2 has entered appearance, the caveats stand discharged. CM No.15075/2013 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. WP (C) No.6962/2013 & CM No.15074/2013 (Stay) Shri Rajinder Dhingra, a Director of the petitioner-Company and his father late Shri Asa Nand Dhingra entered into a partnership vide partnership deed dated 1.1.1983 and started the business of processing, marketing and manufacturing pickles and allied goods. The said firm adopted the trademark PIP in relation to its business. In the y...
Upsc Vs. Pinki Ganeriwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:08. 11.2013 + W.P.(C) 5812/2010 UPSC ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Vardhman Kaushik and Mr Naresh Kaushik, Advs. versus PINKI GANERIWAL .... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) Vide application dated 12.09.2008, the respondent sought the following information from the CPIO of the petitioner-UPSC:a) Subject matter of information:- Selection list of eleven number of Dy Director of Mines Safety (Mining) by UPSC in pursuance of ref no of F.I./287/2006/R-VI contained in advertisement no 8/03 (Employment News 28 April-4May 2007) (b) The period to which the information relates:Year 2008-09 (c) 2. Specific details of information required:Please provide the seniority cum merit list of selected eleven number of Dy Director of Mines Safety (Mining) by UPSE in pursuance of ref no of F.I./287/2006/R-VI contained in advertisement no 08/03 (Employment News 28 April-4 May 2007) for appoint...
Zarar Khan @ Mulla Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :30. h OCTOBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :8. h NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 706/2000 ZARAR KHAN @ MULLA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Malviya, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. AND + CRL.A. 652/2000 MOHD. NAZIR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ajay Malviya, Advocate. versus THE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Shankar, Sahid Khan, Atiq Ahmed, Zarar Khan @ Mulla (A-1) and Mohd. Nazir (A-2) were arrested in case FIR No.246/94 by the police of PS Roop Nagar and sent for trial for committing offences punishable under Sections 394/397/307/34 IPC / 120B IPC and 25/27 Arms Act. Allegations against them were that on 15.11.1994 at about 05.30 P.M. at shop No.12/21, Shakti Nagar, they committed dacoity using revolvers and daggers and injured complainant Chander Kant while depriving him of cash ` 17,000/-, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »