Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Dayal Bagh Co-operative House Building Socie Vs. Mahendra Kumari ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h November, 2013. + RFA5202013 DELHI DAYAL BAGH CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Malviya and Mr. Saurabh, Advocates. Versus MAHENDRA KUMARI SISODIA (SINCE DECEASED) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 25 th July, 2013 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-06, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi of dismissal of Civil Suit No.49/2012 filed by the appellant Society.2. The said suit was filed by the appellant Society for permanent and mandatory injunction i.e. to restrain the respondent/defendant No.1 from raising construction on plot No.B-19 in the colony of Soami Nagar, New Delhi and for directing the respondent/defendant No.2 Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to stop all construction activities on the said plot of land.3. The appellant Society ...
Sp Kureel and Another Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h November, 2013 + W.P.(C) 40/2013 SP KUREEL AND ANOTHER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Adv. with Ms. Seema Salwan, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Adv. with Ms. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The two Petitioners applied for allotment of a flat each under Delhi Housing Scheme-2010. In the case of Application No.0441242, Petitioner No.1 was the first applicant and Petitioner No.2 was the second applicant. In case of Application No.0441244, Petitioner No.2 was the first applicant and his mother Smt. Vidya Kureel was the second applicant. As per the eligibility conditions laid down in the brochure, every citizen of India who was of the age of majority was entitled to apply for allotment of a flat, provided he did not own any residential flat or plot in full or in part on leasehold or f...
Br Packaging Industries Vs. Delhi State Industries Development Corpora ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:11. 11.2013 + W.P.(C) 3867/2012 BR PACKAGING INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Arun Aggarwal, Adv. versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms Anusuya Salwan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) M/s B.R. Packaging Industry, a partnership firm, applied to the respondent-DSIIDC for allotment of an industrial plot under its scheme for relocation of industries running in the non-conforming areas to various industrial estates. A plot bearing No.225, Pocket-E, Sector 3, Bawana, came to be allotted to the aforesaid firm on 24.09.2004. At that time, there were two partners in the firm, namely, Raj Kumari Sharma and late Smt. Rajeshwari. The partnership firm had deposited a sum of Rs 1,08,245/- with DSIIDC on 29.07.2000. It appears that some disputes arose between the legal heirs of Smt. Raj Kumari Sharma and the other partner of the firm, Smt. Rajeshwa...
Viom Network Ltd Vs. S Tel Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of decision:11. h November, 2013 ARB.P. 236/2012 VIOM NETWORK LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anuradha Mukherjee & Mr. Abhijit Mittal, Advs. Versus S TEL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon & Mr. S. Rana, Advs. AND ARB.P. 9/2013 BHARTI INFRATEL LTD Through: Versus S TEL PVT LTD Through: + ..... Petitioner Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Omar Ahmad & Mr. Manu, Advs. ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon & Mr. S. Rana, Advs. AND O.M.P. 206/2012 BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Omar Ahmad & Mr. Manu, Advs. Versus S TEL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon & Mr. S. Rana, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 173/2012, IAs...
Jitender Kumar Vs. Jamia Millia Islamia and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:11. 11.2013 + WP (C) No.2111 of 2013 JITENDER KUMAR Through: .... Petitioner Mr. R.D. Sharma, Mr. Chetan Sharma Mr. Mohan Lal, Ms. Ruchika Sharma & Mr. Rajat Sharma, Advs. Versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jaya Goyal & Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) Vide offer letter dated 22.3.2010 issued by the respondent, Jamia Millia Islamia, the petitioner was informed that the Board of Studies of the Department of Economics had considered his research proposal and recommended his registration for the Ph.D Course under the supervision of Dr. Bathula Srinivas. In continuation of the aforesaid letter, the petitioner was informed, vide letter dated 8.4.2010, that he had been provisionally admitted to the Ph.D. Programme under the supervision of the aforesaid supervisor. He was required to submit his progress report after every six months through proper ...
Bharti Infratel Limited Vs. S Tel Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of decision:11. h November, 2013 ARB.P. 236/2012 VIOM NETWORK LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anuradha Mukherjee & Mr. Abhijit Mittal, Advs. Versus S TEL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon & Mr. S. Rana, Advs. AND ARB.P. 9/2013 BHARTI INFRATEL LTD Through: Versus S TEL PVT LTD Through: + ..... Petitioner Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Omar Ahmad & Mr. Manu, Advs. ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon & Mr. S. Rana, Advs. AND O.M.P. 206/2012 BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Omar Ahmad & Mr. Manu, Advs. Versus S TEL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon & Mr. S. Rana, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 173/2012, IAs...
P.P.Verma Vs. Chief Secretary and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on November 07, 2013 Judgment Delivered on November 11, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7968/2012 P.P.VERMA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Raj Kumar Sherawat, Advocate Versus CHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The petitioner in this petition has sought the following reliefs:Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 14.10.2011 & 18.01.2012 passed by Ms.Manjulika Gautam (Administrative Member) and Mr.M.L.Chauhan (Judicial Member) of Principal Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi and allow the O.A.No.383/2011 by upholding the judgment dated 14.10.2011 passed by Sh.George Pracken (judicial Member). (b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction or order, quashing and setting aside the order dated 06.08....
Continental Advertising Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Raj Rani Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order pronounced on: November 11, 2013 RC. Rev. No.582/2012 & C.M. No.20269/2012 (for stay) CONTINENTAL ADVERTISING PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.D.R.Bhatia, Adv. with Mr.Rishi Manchanda, Adv. versus RAJ RANI AGGARWAL Through ..... Respondent Mr.Sudhir K.Makkar, Adv. with Ms.Meenakshi Singh & Mr.Divij Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 25-B(9) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) against the judgment dated 16th August, 2012 passed by the Addl. Rent Controller in eviction application bearing No.E-68/11 by which the application filed by the petitioner (respondent in the eviction petition) for leave to defend was dismissed.2. Brief facts which are necessary to decide the present petition are that the respondent Smt.Raj Rani Aggarwal filed an application for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) read with...
Apex Chamber of Commerce and Industry Vs. Delhi Development Authority ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:11. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.6904 of 2013 & CM Nos.14951 &14952 of 2013 APEX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY ..... Petitioner Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. PS Bindra, Advs. Through: versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for GNCTD Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. for R-2 UOI Mr. Sanjeev Ralli with Mr. Manu Prashar, Advs. for R-4 DPCC Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) CM152222013 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM152212013 (by petitioner for impleadment) This is an application by certain industries engaged in the industrial activities of stainless steel pickling seeking impleadment as co-petitioners. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed and the applicants are impleaded as co-petitioners in this writ petition. The amended pe...
Bharti Infratel Ltd Vs. S Tel Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of decision:11. h November, 2013 ARB.P. 236/2012 VIOM NETWORK LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anuradha Mukherjee & Mr. Abhijit Mittal, Advs. Versus S TEL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon & Mr. S. Rana, Advs. AND ARB.P. 9/2013 BHARTI INFRATEL LTD Through: Versus S TEL PVT LTD Through: + ..... Petitioner Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Omar Ahmad & Mr. Manu, Advs. ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon & Mr. S. Rana, Advs. AND O.M.P. 206/2012 BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Omar Ahmad & Mr. Manu, Advs. Versus S TEL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon & Mr. S. Rana, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 173/2012, IAs...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »