Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
W. Morris Romel Roy and ors. Vs. Airports Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3398/2013 28th November, 2013 % W. MORRIS ROMEL ROY AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. Versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijai Rai, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.13121/2013 (under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC) For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the applicant is added as petitioner No.20. C.M. stands disposed of. + W.P.(C) No.3398/2013 1. By this writ petition, the petitioners (twenty in number) seek the relief that the respondent/Airport Authority of India should declare the result by finalizing the merit list of the selection process of departmental promotion to the posts of Junior Executive (HR). There are a total of 22 posts with respect to which the selection process took place.2. The admitted facts are that the sele...
Prabha Chawla Vs. State of Haryana and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.13163/2004 28th November, 2013 % PRABHA CHAWLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Yashpal Rangi, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition the petitioner who was earlier an employee of the respondent no.1/State of Haryana, and who was thereafter absorbed permanently by the respondent no.2/Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) w.e.f 23.8.1988, seeks two reliefs in the alternative. First relief which is claimed is that services of the petitioner with the respondent no.1/State of Haryana should be combined with the services rendered by the petitioner with the respondent no.2/IGNOU for the purpose of giving petitioner benefit of combined services as per the circular dated 22.8.1988 issued...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. N Tarika Properties Investment Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :23. rd August, 2013 th Judgment pronounced on:28. November, 2013 % + ITA20802010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME T AX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha , Adv Versus N TA RIKA PROP ERTIES INVE STME NT PVT. LT D. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind Bansal, Adv CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") filed by the Revenue against the order dated 24.08.2009 , passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the "ITAT") whereby the ITAT has dismissed the appeal of the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) ======================================================================= (hereinafter referred to as the "CIT (Appeals)") deleting the addition of Rs.34,50,000/- made under Section 68 of the Act with respect to the share...
Sr Divisional Commercial Manager Vs. M/S Shriram Food and Fertilizer I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2013 + O.M.P. 377/2011 SR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER ....Petitioner VERSUS M/S SHRIRAM FOOD & FERTILIZER INDUSTRIES .... Respondent ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. P.K. Bhalla, Advocate CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.IA No.7829/2011 (condonation of delay) 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in which in the recent past, two detailed orders have been passed by me. The first order was passed on 05.07.2013 and the second order was passed on 06.09.2013. On both occasions, opportunity was given to the petitioner (in short the Railways) to explain by way of affidavits, supported by necessary documentary evidence, as to when exactly a signed copy of the award in issue, was received by the Railways.2. Pursuant to the last order dated 06.09.2013, an affdiavit has been filed on behalf of the Railways by ...
Reserve Bank of India Vs. M/S Jvg Finance Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h October, 2013 Date of decision:28. h November, 2013 % + CO.APPL.1818/2011 IN CO. PET. 265/1998 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Srinjoy Banerjee, Adv. for RBI. versus MS JVG FINANCE LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Abhay Kumar and Mr. Tenzing Tsering, Advs. for applicant/Mr. Achutya Kr. Sharma Mr. Amit Goel with Mr. Kuldip Kalloo, AR of Auction Purchaser Mr Shailendra Singh and Mr. Yashpal Singh, Advs. for Mr.V.K. Sharma, Ex-Director Mr Rajiv Bahl, Adv. for official liquidator. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT R. V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an application filed by one Achyut Kumar Sharma and the following prayers have been made therein:(a) Allow, entertain and taken on record the present application of the applicant and implead the applicant as a necessary party in the present Company Petition No.265 of 1998; (b) set aside the auction vide order dated 17.05.2006 passed by this Honble Court in C.P...
Vrs Foods Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 11.2013 Date of Decision:28. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.7084 of 2010 PARAS NATURAL SPRING WATER PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS DELHI & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr. M. Dutta, Adv. + WP(C) No.7085 of 2010 VRS FOODS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv. versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS DELHI & ANR...... Respondents Through: Mr. M. Dutta, Adv. + WP(C) No.7087 of 2010 VRS FOODS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv. versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS DELHI & ANR...... Respondents Through: Mr. M. Dutta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.In WP (C) No.7084/2010, Shri Gajender Kumar and Chaudhary Ved Ram trading as M/s. Vedram & Sons (as applicant), applied to the Registrar of Trade Marks for registration of the mark PARAS PREMIUM, on 23.12.1996. The petitioner claims to have acquired rights over the said trademark PARAS PREMI...
Sandeep @ Sanjeev Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:25. 11.2013 Judgment pronounced on:28. 11.2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.396/2012 SANDEEP @ SANJEEV Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Arnayak Pathak, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. Appellant Sandeep @ Sanjeev, by way of the present appeal, has assailed the judgement and order on sentence dated 29.04.2011 and 13.05.2011 respectively whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. The appellant has been sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years under Section 397 IPC and for the offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, he has been sentenced to undergo RI for one year and fine of `1000/-. In default of payment of fine, he has to further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 10 days. Both the sentences have been directed to run con...
Paras Natural Spring Water Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 11.2013 Date of Decision:28. 11.2013 % + WP(C) No.7084 of 2010 PARAS NATURAL SPRING WATER PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS DELHI & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr. M. Dutta, Adv. + WP(C) No.7085 of 2010 VRS FOODS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv. versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS DELHI & ANR...... Respondents Through: Mr. M. Dutta, Adv. + WP(C) No.7087 of 2010 VRS FOODS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv. versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS DELHI & ANR...... Respondents Through: Mr. M. Dutta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.In WP (C) No.7084/2010, Shri Gajender Kumar and Chaudhary Ved Ram trading as M/s. Vedram & Sons (as applicant), applied to the Registrar of Trade Marks for registration of the mark PARAS PREMIUM, on 23.12.1996. The petitioner claims to have acquired rights over the said trademark PARAS PREMI...
Blueberry Books and ors. Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 676 of 2012 Reserved on: November 20, 2013 Decision on: November 28, 2013 BLUEBERRY BOOKS & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Pratibha M. Singh, Mr. Ashwani Kumar & Ms. Suhasini Raina, Advocates versus GOOGLE INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Malhotra & Mr. Angad Duggal, Advocates for Defendant No.1 Mr. Akhil Anand & Mr. Praveen Sehrawat, Advocates for Defendant No.2 Mr. Manav Kumar, Advocate for Defendants 3 and 4. Mr. Udit Sood, Advocate for Defendants 5 & 6/Applicants in IA No.18547 of 2013. Ms. Sneha Jain & Mr. Sahil Sethi, Advocates for Defendant No.10/ Applicant in IA13852of 2012. Mr. Mohan Vidhani & Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Advocates for Defendant No.11. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2811.2013 IA Nos. 7706-07 of 2012 (Order I Rule 10 CPC) 1. These are two applications under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking deletion of Defendants 1 and 3 respectively from the array of p...
Baldev Raj Jaggi Vs. National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Feder ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 11.2013 Pronounced on:28. 11.2013 + EFA (OS) 37/2011, C.M. 19815/2011 (for stay) & 19816/2011 (for filing additional documents) BALDEV RAJ JAGGI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. J.K. Sharma, Mr. Prateek Chaddha and Mr. Mahender Singh, Advocates. versus NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Thakur and Mr. R.K. Mishra, Advocates, for Resp. No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeal arises from an order of the learned Single Judge dismissing objections (under Order XXI, Rule 58 CPC) preferred by the appellant, (hereafter the objector) concerning the sale of property bearing No.A-13, Block B-1, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi, 110044 (hereinafter the property in question).2. The property in question was the subject matter of a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »