Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh @ Jangali Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h October, 2013 DECIDED ON :12. h November, 2013 + CRL.A. 412/2003 RAJESH @ JANGALI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with appellant present in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred by Rajesh @ Jangali to challenge a judgment dated 13.05.2003 whereby in case FIR No.36/2002 registered at Police Station Kalkaji, he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for five years with fine.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 07.01.2002 at about 07.30 P.M. after committing criminal trespass in Jhuggi No.C-149, Dr. Ambadkar Camp, Nehru Place, he inflicted injuries to Rohtash with a churi in an attempt to murder him. The prosecution examined nine witnesses to prove the charges. In 313 statement, the appellant pleaded innocence a...
Balwan Singh and ors. Vs. Settlement Officer and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA682013 BALWAN SINGH AND ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate with Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus SETTLEMENT OFFICER AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yogesh Saini and Ms. Deepti Gaur, Advocates for Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate. Date of Decision:12. h November, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 03rd December, 2012 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 8965/2007 whereby the writ petition filed by twenty-one villagers of village Mundka, Delhi, challenging the order of Settlement Officer (Consolidation) dated 04th April, 1983 directing shifting of cremation ground to a new location at the outskirts of extended Lal Dora of the said village was dismissed.2. The learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition has9. Upon indepth consideration of the ...
D.P.Sharma Vs. Bses and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.1906/1998 12th November, 2013 D.P.SHARMA ......Petitioner Through: None. VERSUS BSES & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. I have waited for counsel for the parties for some time. No one however appears for the parties. Since this is an old writ petition of the year 1998, I deem it fit not to adjourn the matter. I have gone through the records and am proceeding to pass a judgment.2. Petitioner by this writ petition seeks implementation of the promotion order dated 6.12.1994 for his being granted salary in the payscale of Rs. 2200-4100. Petitioner was an erstwhile employee of the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB) which was thereafter unbundled into DISCOMS. After unbundling, petitioners services at present will stand transferred to the DISCOMS North Delhi Power Ltd. (NDPL). Though there was earlier confusion as to whether petit...
Sushil Kumar JaIn Vs. Dda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h November, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7433/2012 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K.Saini, Adv. with Ms. Seema Salwan, Adv. versus DDA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.K. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Petitioner who got himself registered for allotment of an MIG flat under NPRS-1979 Scheme of the DDA has approached this Court challenging the cancellation of the said allotment by a letter dated 19.09.2006 by the DDA. He seeks the following relief:a) A writ of certiorari calling for the records of the case and peruse the same; b) A writ of certiorari quashing the action of the Respondent/DDA in cancelling the allotment of the MIG flat made in favour of the allottee under NPRS1979after receiving back the allotment letter sent at the residential address given by him at the time of registration without trying to serve the same at the occupation address, despite the fac...
Giri Raj Sharma Vs. the Director, Consortium for Educational Communica
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.5842/1998 12th November, 2013 GIRI RAJ SHARMA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. V.Shekhar, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Vishal Sharma and Mr. S.Rana, Advocates VERSUS THE DIRECTOR, CONSORTIUM FOR EDUCATIONAL COMMUNICATION & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Mamta Tiwari, Adv. for Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. On 4.10.2013, the following order was passed:1. Petitioner is a Technical Assistant with respondent No.1 and claims parity with an Engineering Assistant working with Doordarshan.2. Though a Grievance Redressal Committee states that qualifications are identical for the two posts, however, what are the qualifications of a Technical Assistant for being appointed as such with respondent No.1 and what are the qualifications required for being appointed as an Engineering Assistant with Doordarshan are not found in the record of th...
M/S Ansal Properties and Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ratnu (Deceased) Thr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h November, 2013. + RFA1632002 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Mr. Manoj Taneja, Ms. Meenakshi Midha and Mr. Chetan Priyadarshi, Advocates. Versus RATNU (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. N.S. Vashisht and Mr. Arpan Sharma, Advocates for R-2(b)-2(e). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 24 th November, 2001 (of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi in Suit No.278/1993) of dismissal of the suit for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale of immovable property filed by the appellant and the respondent No.3 Sh. N.K. Jain.2. The suit was filed on 11th March, 1983, pleading: (i) that the deceased respondents/defendants No.1 & 2 namely Sh. Ratnu and Sh. Sarjeet, both sons of Sh. Thakar Dass were Bhumidars of land admeasuring 19 bighas and 4 bi...
Commander and ors. Vs. Bhupendera Kardeam and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 12, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3381/2002 COMMANDER & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Derodya, Advocate versus BHUPENDERA KARDEAM & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate for R-1, R-2 and R-4 to R-6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The writ petition lays a challenge to the order dated January 22, 2002 in Original Application No.303/2000, whereby the Tribunal allowed the Original Application filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 6 herein and set aside the selection of respondent Nos.7 to 13 as Mazdoors.2. The brief facts are that 24 vacancies of Mazdoors were notified to the Sub Regional Employment Exchange, Kirby Place, Delhi Cant. by the petitioners. Simultaneously an advertisement to this effect was also released in 3 national dailies.3. The required qualifications and age for the candidates...
Simarjit Kaur and ors. Vs. Ram Murti Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12. h November, 2013 MAC.APP. 611/2013 SIMARJIT KAUR & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.S.N. Parashar, Adv. versus RAM MURTI SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is directed against the award dated 21st November, 2012 whereby learned Tribunal has awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.17,98,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellants seek enhancement of the compensation award amount, as noted above.3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has argued the sole ground that age of the deceased Baljinder Singh was 28 years on the date of accident, i.e. 23rd July, 2012, despite, that the learned Tribunal has added 30% towards future prospects.4. To strengthen his argument, counsel has re...
Anandpur Dham Kalyan Samiti (Regd.) Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:24. 10.2013 Date of Decision:12. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.9957 of 2009 & CM No.8242 of 2009 ANANDPUR DHAM KALYAN SAMITI (REGD.) ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Ms. Jahnavi Upadhyay, Advs. For R-1 Govt. of NCT of Delhi Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Mr. Kunal Kohli and Mr. Vikas Sood, Advs. For DSIDC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioner before this Court is a registered society and claims to represent the residents of Anandpur Dham, an unauthorized colony being considered for regularization. According to the petitioner, the aforesaid colony has come up on an agricultural land of Village Karala. The Government of India prepared guidelines for regularization of unauthorized colonies and submitted the same to this Court on 20.2.2001 in CWP No.4771/1993, Common Cause ver...
Ram Parshad Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :3. d SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :12. h NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 230/2000 RAM PARSHAD Through : ....Appellant Mr. M.M.Singh, Advocate with Mr.Sunil Singh, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Ram Parshad (the appellant) challenges the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 08.03.2000 in Sessions Case No.398/94 arising out of FIR No.233/91 under Section 302 IPC registered at PS Gokal Puri by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 304 part-II IPC and awarded RI for seven years with fine ` 3,000/-. The factual matrix of the case are as under :2. Meera, (Ram Roops sister) married to Radhey Shyam, appellants son, had come to stay at her parents house on the occasion of delivery of a son to her sister-in-law (Devrani), Rustams wife. On the day of incident i.e. 25.07.1991, Radhey Shyam had come to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »