Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d September, 2013 Pronounced on:13. h November, 2013 + CRL.A. 1327/2012 DEVENDER SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate CRL.A. 1328/2012 RAKESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Avinder Singh, Advocate & Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Advocate versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate CRL.A. 1329/2012 RAMESH SINGH BISHT Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anita Abraham, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL J.1. These three appeals are directed against the judgment dated 23.03.2012 and order on sentence dated 24.03.2012 whereby the Appellants Ramesh Singh Bisht, Devender Singh and Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary were convicted in Sessions Case No.155 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Section 302...
Vinod Service Station Vs. Acp, Licensing and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:13. 11.2013 + WP(C) No.7155 of 2013 VINOD SERVICE STATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Shweta Bharti, Mr. Vineet Dwivedi, Mr. Shiju George, Mr. Shantanu & Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Advs. versus ACP, LICENSING & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Digvijay Rai, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Milanka Chaudhury, Mr. Sarojanand Jha, Mr. Amit Ojha & Ms. Garima Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) CM Nos.15401-15402/2013 (Exemptions) Allowed subject to just exceptions. WP (C) No.7155/2013 The petitioner before this Court is challenging the order dated 10.10.2013, passed by respondent No.1, Additional Commissioner of Police (Licensing) whereby he in exercise of the powers conferred upon him under Rule 150 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002 confirmed the show cause notice issued to BPCL and cancelled the NOC issued to the Chief Controller of Explosives on 22.12.2004 f...
Marut Nandan Educational Society and anr. Vs. All India Council for Te ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 10.2013 Date of Decision:13. 11.2013 % + WP (C) No.4478 of 2011 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. + WP (C) No.8372 of 2011 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. + WP (C) No.2812 of 2012 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. + WP (C) No.3431 of 2013 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr...
Ashok Kumar Mandal Vs. the Govt of the Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:13. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 1781/2012 ASHOK KUMAR MANDAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Umesh Shandilya, Adv. versus THE GOVT OF THE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms Ferida Satarwala, Adv for GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner was born in the territory, which now forms part of State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner belongs to a caste known as Nomosudra and his father migrated to Delhi in the year 1990, when the petitioner was about 2 years old. The Government of India, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment came out with a Scheme for grant of Post-Matric scholarship to the students belonging to Scheduled Castes, for studies in India. Only those candidates who belonged to Scheduled Caste so specified in relation to the State/Union Territory to which they actually belonged, i.e., permanently settled and who had passed the Matriculation or higher secondary or any higher e...
Marut Nandan Educational Society and anr. Vs. All India Council for Te ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 10.2013 Date of Decision:13. 11.2013 % + WP (C) No.4478 of 2011 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. + WP (C) No.8372 of 2011 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. + WP (C) No.2812 of 2012 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. + WP (C) No.3431 of 2013 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr...
Sahil JaIn Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h October, 2013 Pronounced on:13. h November, 2013 + W. P. (CRL.) 1136/2013 SAHIL JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advocate with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Advocate, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Mr. Parth Mallick & Ms. Tina Singh, Advocates versus UOI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Advocate for UOI. Mr. S.K. Dubey, Advocate with Mr. Raj Mangal Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Anandi Mishra, Advocate for R-3. Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL J.1. Petitioner Sahil Jain has approached this Court for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus for release of his father Komal Jain, who has been ordered to be detained and kept in custody in the Central Jail, Tihar by an order dated 11.06.2013 issued under Section 3 (1) of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Sm...
Nisha Saxena and ors Vs. Bhartendu Chaturvedi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on Pronounced on + :26. 08.2013 :13. 11.2013 OA1012013 in CS(OS)978/2011 NISHA SAXENA & ORS Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Vaibhav Dang, Advocate versus BHARTENDU CHATURVEDI & ORS ..... Defendants Through Ms. Rekha Palli and Ms.Amrita Prakash, Advocate for D-2. Mr. Arvind Shukla, Advocate for D3. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate for D4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present appeal is filed under the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules 1967 challenging the order dated 19.07.2013 of the Joint Registrar whereby the application of the appellant/defendant No.3 i.e. I.A. No.15368/2013 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for being deleted as party was dismissed.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration, recovery and injunction. Plaintiff No.1 is the mother of plaintiffs No.2 and 3. The son of plaintiff No.1 late Sh. Akash Chittranshi who was lawyer by profession, was living in New Delhi. He died at a very yo...
G.D. Builders Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Writ Petition (Civil) No.4107/2008 Reserved on:23. d July, 2013 Date of Decision:13. h November, 2013 % G.D. BUILDERS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. J.K. Mittal, Mr. Varun Prabhakar & Mr. Varun Gaba, Advocates. versus UOI AND ANR. .. Respondents Through Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, Addl. Solicitor General with Mr. Mukesh Anand and Mr. Ashish Virmani for UOI/R-1. Ms. Sonia Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. + W.P.(C) 10226/2009 RAJ FURNITURE ..... Petitioner Through Mr. J.K. Mittal, Mr. Varun Prabhakar & Mr. Varun Gaba, Advocates. versus UOI + .. Respondent Through Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, Addl. Solicitor General with Mr. Mukesh Anand and Mr. Ashish Virmani for UOI/R-1. Ms. Sonia Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. W.P.(C) 4127/2008 CLARION PROPERTIES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. J.K. Mittal, Mr. Varun Prabhakar & Mr. Varun Gaba, Advocates. Versus Page 1 of 51 UOI AND ORS. .... Respondents Through Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, Addl. Solicito...
Atul Kumar JaIn Vs. N.K. Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :26. 08.2013 Judgment Pronounced on:13. 11.2013 + IA No.3498/2012 (leave to defend) in CS(OS) 2617/2011 ATUL KUMAR JAIN Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Govind Kumar and Ms Navlin Swain, Advocates versus N.K. JAIN Through ..... Defendant Mr.Vivek Singh and Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.3498/2012 (leave to defend) 1. This is an application filed by the defendant under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC seeking leave to defend the suit. The present plaint is filed for recovery of a sum of Rs. 25 lacs. The plaintiff states that he is an Engineer from IIT Kanpur and he has vast knowledge of property valuation. It is stated that the defendant is a Chartered Accountant and approached the plaintiff for evaluation/assessment of certain properties during the year 2010-2011.2. The plaintiff at the request of the defendant evaluated/ made assessment in ...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Divya Khanija and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
$~33 & 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h November,2013 + MAC.APP. 1004/2013 & CM Nos.17550/2013, 17551/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. Versus DIVYA KHANIJA & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents None. AND $~50 + MAC.APP. 1014/2013 & CM Nos.10670/2013, 10671/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. Versus SHUBHAM & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM Nos. 17551/2013 in MACA No.1004/2013 & 10671/2013 in MACA No.1014/2013 (both for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. MAC.APP. Nos. 1004 & 1014 of 2013 1. By way of the appeals noted above , the appellant/Insurance Company has challenged the common impugned award dated 01.08.2013 passed by the learned Tribunal, whereby a sum of Rs.2,75,586/- wa...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »