Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajbir Singh Vs. B.S.F. and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5464/2013 Date of decision:18. H November, 2013 % RAJBIR SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sidharth Joshi, Adv. Versus B.S.F. & ANR Through ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (ORAL) 1. By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner prays for setting aside the order dated 30th June, 2011 whereby a request for voluntary retirement from service was accepted w.e.f. 31st July, 2011. The petitioner has also prayed for issuance of a writ of certiorari praying for setting aside of an order dated 11th February, 2013 whereby the petitioners representation dated 7th November, 2012 was rejected.2. The sole ground in support of the prayer made in the writ petition is that the impugned orders have been passed pursuant to a forged and fabricated application dated 2nd February, 2011 purportedly seeking to voluntarily retire from service with the ...
Ramesh Singh Bisht Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d September, 2013 Pronounced on:13. h November, 2013 + CRL.A. 1327/2012 DEVENDER SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate CRL.A. 1328/2012 RAKESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Avinder Singh, Advocate & Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Advocate versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate CRL.A. 1329/2012 RAMESH SINGH BISHT Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anita Abraham, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL J.1. These three appeals are directed against the judgment dated 23.03.2012 and order on sentence dated 24.03.2012 whereby the Appellants Ramesh Singh Bisht, Devender Singh and Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary were convicted in Sessions Case No.155 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Section 302...
Marut Nandan Educational Society and anr. Vs. All India Council for Te ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 10.2013 Date of Decision:13. 11.2013 % + WP (C) No.4478 of 2011 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. + WP (C) No.8372 of 2011 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. + WP (C) No.2812 of 2012 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. + WP (C) No.3431 of 2013 MARUT NANDAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr...
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Shubham and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
$~33 & 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h November,2013 + MAC.APP. 1004/2013 & CM Nos.17550/2013, 17551/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. Versus DIVYA KHANIJA & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents None. AND $~50 + MAC.APP. 1014/2013 & CM Nos.10670/2013, 10671/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. Versus SHUBHAM & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM Nos. 17551/2013 in MACA No.1004/2013 & 10671/2013 in MACA No.1014/2013 (both for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. MAC.APP. Nos. 1004 & 1014 of 2013 1. By way of the appeals noted above , the appellant/Insurance Company has challenged the common impugned award dated 01.08.2013 passed by the learned Tribunal, whereby a sum of Rs.2,75,586/- wa...
Radhey Education Pvt Ltd Vs. International Institute of Planning and M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2013 + ARB.P. 320/2013 RADHEY EDUCATION PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr D.V. Khatri, Adv. versus INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PVT LTD (Now known as CENTER FOR VOCATIONAL AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP STUDIES) ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act). Notice in this petition was issued on 31.07.2013. As per the report of the registry notice has been served on the respondent as far back as on 02.09.2013 at one of the two addresses given in the memo of parties. There is no representation, however, on behalf of the respondent despite service of summons in the matter.2. Briefly, the averments made in the petition are as follows: The petitioner claims that a lease deed was executed with respondent on 09.05.2011, whereby the following premises we...
Mohd. Asif Vs. Delhi Wakf Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: November 13, 2013 + CM(M) No.1183/2013 & C.M. No.17217/2013 MOHD. ASIF ..... Petitioner Through Mr.G.M.Farooqui, Adv. versus DELHI WAKF BOARD Through ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the impugned order dated 18 th September 2013 passed by the learned ADJ-02/Wakf Tribunal, Patiala House, New Delhi, in a suit bearing No.ML610, whereby the application of the petitioner (plaintiff in the suit) under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC seeking relief to grant interim protection by way of staying the operation of the eviction order dated 31st December 2009 passed by the Chief Executive Officer of the respondent-Board was dismissed by the Tribunal.2. The suit was filed by the petitioner/plaintiff with a prayer for passing a decree, declaring relationship of t...
State Bank of India Vs. Presiding Officer and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6318/2000 Decided on 13th November, 2013 ..... Petitioner STATE BANK OF INDIA Through :Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Vatsala Rai, Advs. versus PRESIDING OFFICER & ANR. Through ..... Respondents :Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, respondent No.2 Adv. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J (ORAL) 1. Briefly stated, facts of the case as unfolded are that respondent No.2 was working as a Clerk with the petitioner State Bank of India (SBI) right from 1966. He was posted at Chandni Chowk Branch, Delhi. During his long service spread over to a period of 25 years he remained posted in Chandni Chowk Branch, Delhi. During this period, only one inter- departmental transfer took place in the year 1989 when he was posted in C & I Division from the accounts branch. On 19 th December, 1991 he was transferred to Shakurpur Branch, Delhi of SBI. Respondent No.2 filed a civil suit bearing No.368/1991 before the Sub-Judge, 1st Class, Delhi wherein an a...
Devender Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d September, 2013 Pronounced on:13. h November, 2013 + CRL.A. 1327/2012 DEVENDER SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate CRL.A. 1328/2012 RAKESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Avinder Singh, Advocate & Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Advocate versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate CRL.A. 1329/2012 RAMESH SINGH BISHT Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anita Abraham, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL J.1. These three appeals are directed against the judgment dated 23.03.2012 and order on sentence dated 24.03.2012 whereby the Appellants Ramesh Singh Bisht, Devender Singh and Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary were convicted in Sessions Case No.155 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Section 302...
Harvinder Singh Vs. C B I
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1880/2013 & Crl.M.A.Nos.17140-41/2013 Decided on 13.11.2013 IN THE MATTERS OF : HARVINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Ravi P. Shukla, Advocate versus CBI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Bakul Jain, proxy counsel for Mr. P.K. Sharma, SC for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying inter alia for setting aside the order on charge dated 24.1.2012 passed by the learned Special Judge, (PC Act-CBI), Delhi in C.C. No.19/2008 entitled CBI vs. Brij Mohan Sethi etc.2. As the order impugned by the petitioner is dated 24.1.2012, upon a query posed to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to the stage of proceedings, the Court is informed that the case is at the stage of recording of evidence of the prosecution witnesses.3. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner (accused No.7) was wo...
Rajiv Khosla Vs. Delhi High Court Bar Association and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:08. 11.2013 % + Order delivered on:13. 11.2013 CS(OS) 2149/2013 & I.A. 17827-17828/2013 RAJIV KHOSLA ..... Plaintiff Through: Plaintiff in person. versus DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ORS..... Defendants Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI ORDER VIPIN SANGHI, J.I.A. No.17827/2013 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The plaintiff is granted four weeks time to file better copies of dim documents and to file the original documents in his power and possession. Application stands disposed of. C.S. (OS) No.2149/2013 Issue summons in the suit to the defendants returnable on 15.01.2014 before the joint registrar by ordinary process, registered AD speed post and authorised courier, to be listed along with C.S. (OS) No.2111/2013 titled Delhi Bar Association & Ors. V. Delhi High Court Bar Association & Anr. I.A. No.17828/2013 1. Issue notice to the defendants returnable on 15.01.2014 before the joint registr...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »