Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 18 2013

Rajat Sharma Vs. State and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-18-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 22, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: November 18, 2013 + (i) CRL.M.C.4260/2011 & Crl.M.A.19619/2011 INDEPENDENT NEWS SERVICE PVT LTD. & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohan Garg and Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Through: + (ii) ....Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-State Mr.Amit Sharma, Mr. Praveen Nagar and Mr. Jasminder Shokand, Advocates for respondent No.2 CRL.M.C.4263/2011 & Crl.M.A.19624/2011 RAJAT SHARMA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Aman Lekhi Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohan Garg and Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Through: ....Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-State Mr.Amit Sharma, Mr. Praveen Nagar and Mr. Jasminder Shokand, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of impugned or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2013

Smt Sushma Bhardwaj and ors. Vs. Shri Ram Sevak Kumar and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-18-2013

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. h November,2013 + MAC.APP. 658/2013 SMT SUSHMA BHARDWAJ & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Ms.Sumita Hazarika and Ms.Ipsita, Advocates. Versus SHRI RAM SEVAK KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Vaidant Chadha for Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 21.12.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.28,21,066/- with interest at the rate of 7.5 % per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization.2. By way of this appeal, the appellants/claimants are seeking enhancement of the award amount noted above.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/claimants has submitted that at the time of the accident, the deceased was working as an Attendant in the All India Institute of Medica...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2013

Satish Chand Gupta Vs. State and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-18-2013

$~ 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 464/2013 % Judgment dated 18.11.2013 SATISH CHAND GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Shiv Charan Garg, Mr.Imran Khan and Ms.Jyoti Sinha, Advocates versus STATE & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Special Judge, Anti Corruption on 18.9.2012, the petitioner has filed the present petition.2. In this case, the petitioner has made a complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to the Special Judge, to register an FIR. The prayer made before the Special Judge was declined, as the petitioner had failed to obtain sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that at the stage of section 156(3) Cr.P.C., sanction is not required.4. Counsel for the State disputes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Mahajan, counsel for the State has placed rel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2013

Vijay Kumar Jha Vs. Carzonrent (India) Private Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-18-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: November 18, 2013 CM(M) No.977/2013, C.M. Nos.14810/2013 & 17498/2013 SUNIL CHAUDHARY Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.982/2013, C.M. Nos.14956/2013 & 17511/2013 VIJAY KUMAR JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.987/2013, C.M. Nos.14977/2013 & 17507/2013 BHAGYA NARAYAN JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.998/201...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2013

Ramesh Fonia Vs. Uoi and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-18-2013

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) 8107/2011 Reserved on:9. h October, 2013 Date of decision:18. h November, 2013 RAMESH FONIA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Arun Srivastava, Adv. versus UOI AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.1. By way of the present writ petition, a challenge is laid to the refusal of the respondents to grant disability pension to the petitioner even though he retired from service on grounds of medical unfitness resulting from an injury suffered by him while on bonafide government duty deployed at the Border Out Post (BOP) Barapansuri (Mizoram). The adjudication hinges on the issue as to whether the injuries suffered by the petitioner are attributable to service or not.2. The facts giving rise to the present petition to the extent necessary for the purposes of the present writ petition are briefly noted hereafter. WP(C) No.8107/2011 pa...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2013

Sunil Chaudhary Vs. Carzonrent (India) Private Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-18-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2013

Harminder Singh Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-18-2013

$~21. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 22/2010 Judgment dated 18th November, 2013 % HARMINDER SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal arises out of a judgment dated 27.11.2009 and order on sentence dated 30.11.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the appellant, Harminder Singh, has been directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) for seven years with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, Simple Imprisonment for four months for the offense punishable under Section 392/34 IPC. It was also directed that benefit under Section 428 Cr.P.C. would be given to the appellant.2. The necessary facts, to be noticed for disposal of the present appeal, are as under:Sushil Aggarwal was doing the chemical business at shop no.2831/212, Tri Nagar, Delhi. He was residing at F...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2013

Rajiv Maira and anr. Vs. M/S Apex Apartments Pvt Ltd and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-18-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h November, 2013 % + RFA2322013 & CM No.15440/2013 (for stay). RAJIV MAIRA & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sushil Shukla, Selender Singh & Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Advs. versus M/S APEX APARTMENTS PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Radhika Chandrasekher, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 23rd January, 2013 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge-04, South District, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi of in limine dismissal, of the CS. No.366/12 filed by the two appellants for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale of immovable property being space No.S-4 on the second floor of plot No.E480, Greater Kailash Part-II, New Delhi and for permanent injunction, on the ground of the claim of the appellants/plaintiffs being barred by time. The learned Addl. District ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2013