Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madhu Vs. Ashok Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.57/2011 Date of Decision :29. 11.2013 MADHU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.J.C.Mahindroo, Advocate. versus ASHOK KUMAR ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) CM No.6584/2011 1. Allowed subject to deficiency being rectified. The application stands disposed of. CM No.6585/2011 (Condonation of Delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of one day in filing the instant appeal is condoned and the application is allowed. RSA No.57/2011 & CM No.6583/2011 (Stay) 1. This is a regular second appeal which is pending in this court since 31.03.2011. No substantial question of law has been formulated till date.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant on the formulation of a substantial question of law involved in the matter. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that the property in question being C-1/62B, Ashok Vihar, Phase-II, Delhi-110052, was purchased fr...
Jyoti and ors. Vs. Pawan Kumar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. h November, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 1274/2012 JYOTI AND ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Ms. Vishakha for Mr.M.K. Sinha, Advocate. Versus PAWAN KUMAR AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 11.04.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.10,60,000/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization.2. Vide the instant appeal, appellants are seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as noted above.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has argued that at the time of the accident, the deceased was 32 years of age, despite that the learned Tribunal has not granted any amount towards future prospects.4. She further...
Naib Sub Anil and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7010/2013 Date of decision:29. h November, 2013 NAIB SUB ANIL & ORS Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. S.S. Pandey, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : ..... Respondent Ms. Barkha Babbar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioners have challenged their exclusion from accompanying their parent unit i.e. 8 RAJ RIF on UN Mission tenure premising the decision of respondents on the policy dated 30th August, 2010. The primary ground of challenge is that the respondents have wrongly been ignored vide policy dated 25th January, 2011, which specified that any individual who had been part of the unit for five years continuously or otherwise, posted or in the panel should be considered for the UN assignment when the unit was selected. This was also applicable to any individual who had done a foreign tenure.2. The petitioner has...
Hav Azmal Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 6986/2013 & CM No.15126/2013 RFN SANDEEP KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. D.S. Kauntae, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. + W.P.(C) 6908/2013 & CM Nos.14961/2013, 15986/2013 HAV AZMAL Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. D.S. Kauntae, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr. A.P. Singh with Ms. Gurjinder Kaur, Adv. and Major Rohit Jha, Defence for R-1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. By way of the instant writ petitions, the petitioners have contended that they have been wrongly excluded from the select list of soldiers of 8 Raj Rif Battalion who were to proceed on UN WP(C) Nos.6986/2013 & 6908/2013 page 1 of 5 Mission on 23rd of November, 2013.2. The petitioner (Rfn Sandeep Kumar in WP(C)No.6986/2013) rests his case on a specific pleading that he wa...
Rfn Sandeep Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 6986/2013 & CM No.15126/2013 RFN SANDEEP KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. D.S. Kauntae, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. + W.P.(C) 6908/2013 & CM Nos.14961/2013, 15986/2013 HAV AZMAL Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. D.S. Kauntae, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr. A.P. Singh with Ms. Gurjinder Kaur, Adv. and Major Rohit Jha, Defence for R-1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. By way of the instant writ petitions, the petitioners have contended that they have been wrongly excluded from the select list of soldiers of 8 Raj Rif Battalion who were to proceed on UN WP(C) Nos.6986/2013 & 6908/2013 page 1 of 5 Mission on 23rd of November, 2013.2. The petitioner (Rfn Sandeep Kumar in WP(C)No.6986/2013) rests his case on a specific pleading that he wa...
Sqn Ldr Arpita JaIn and Others Vs. Uoi and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
Sunil Hali, J. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, the same are being disposed off by a common order. The controversy involved in these petitions is-whether the petitioners have the right to question the policy formulated by the Government in exercise of its executive power, which is being operated retrospectively with the consequence that its operation makes a discrimination among the persons who are similarly situated? In order to appreciate the controversy involved in these cases, it is necessary to refer to the facts of each case. OA 38/2013-Sqn Ldr Arpita Jain The petitioner, after completion of MBBS from Armed Force Medical College, applied for being appointed in the Air Force as Short Service Commissioned Officer and joined on 13.03.2006. Her appointment was initially for a period of seven years which was extendable for a further period of seven years. The petitioner is aggrieved by the policy issued by the respondents on 31.07.2012...
Commissioner of Income Tax-ii Vs. Maf Academy P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on : Judgment pronounced on: + 13 th August, 2013 28 th November, 2013 ITA3412012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME T AX-II ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni with Mr. Ruchesh Sinha, Advocates. Versus MAF A CA DEMY P. LTD. Through ..... Respondent Dr. Rakesh Gupta with Ms. Rani Kiyala and Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. This is an appeal under Se ction 260A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act) filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 14.10.2011 in ITA No.3650/DEL/2011 for the Assessment Year 2002-03. ======================================================================= 2. Vide order dated 07.11.2012, the following substantial question of law was framed:Whether on the facts and circumstances of case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in deleting the addition of R...
Delhi Anusuchit Jati Vikas Sanghtan Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:28. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 6756/2012 DELHI ANUSUCHIT JATI VIKAS SANGHTAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Vikas B. Pakhiddey, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Nanda, Additional Standing Cousnel and Mr Manish Kr. Vikkey, Advs for Respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) A Panchayat Ghar/Ragair Choupal was constructed by Government of NCT of Delhi in C-Block, Phase-II, Nangloi, Delhi. As per the terms and conditions of the Scheme under which the aforesaid Panchayat Ghar/Ragair Choupal was constructed, its possession was to be handed over to an identified Association/RWA/Society/Registered Body/Institution for day to day maintenance work. For this purpose, an MoU was to be signed Association/RWA/Society/Registered W.P.(C) No.6756/2012 between the Body/Institution identified and Department of Welfare of SC/ST in the Government of NCT of Delhi. Since no suc...
Anil Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 28, 2013 + (1) CRL.A. 456/1998 ANIL KUMAR Through ..... Appellant Mr.Vikrant Sarin, Advocate versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the State with Insp. Ravindra Ahlawat, PS Karol Bagh, New Delhi AND + (2) CRL.A. 481/1998 SARAVJEET SINGH Through ..... Appellant Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the State with Insp. Ravindra Ahlawat, PS Karol Bagh, New Delhi AND + (3) CRL.A. 549/1998 TILAK RAJ ..... Appellant Through Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus STATE Through CRL.A. Nos.456/1998, 481/1998 & 549/1998 ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the State with Insp. Ravindra Ahlawat, PS Karol Bagh, New Delhi Page 1 of 34 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this common order we propose to decide three appea...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Adarsh Kant Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS.(CRL) 2/2013 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae) Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with DCP S.B.S. Tyagi, (Distt. New Delhi) Inspector Dinesh Kumar, SubInspector Sandeep Kumar, Police Station Tilak Marg, New Delhi. versus ADARSH KANT KAPOOR ..... Respondent Through: % None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR ORDER2811.2013 Crl.M.A. No.17931/2013 (Exemption from personal appearance and directions) This application was filed by the appellant/alleged contemnor under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to seek exemption from his personal appearance with the Registry of this court on 28th October 2013 with the request to the Registry not to list his application before 28th November 2013. Alongwith the present application, the alleged contemnor also annexed a copy of the letter dated 21st October 2013, and email copy o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »