Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 22, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: November 18, 2013 + (i) CRL.M.C.4260/2011 & Crl.M.A.19619/2011 INDEPENDENT NEWS SERVICE PVT LTD. & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohan Garg and Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Through: + (ii) ....Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-State Mr.Amit Sharma, Mr. Praveen Nagar and Mr. Jasminder Shokand, Advocates for respondent No.2 CRL.M.C.4263/2011 & Crl.M.A.19624/2011 RAJAT SHARMA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Aman Lekhi Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohan Garg and Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Through: ....Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-State Mr.Amit Sharma, Mr. Praveen Nagar and Mr. Jasminder Shokand, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of impugned or...
Satyendra Pal Singh Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
$~ 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 46/2013 & CRL.M.A. 12398/2013 % Judgment dated 18.11.2013 SATYENDRA PAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Aditya Aggarwal, Advocate versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan and Ms.Manvi Priya, Advocate along with ASI Nisar Ahmed, P.S. Sadar Bazar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed against the order dated 29.11.2012 passed by the learned ASJ.2. A complaint under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was filed by the petitioner, which was dismissed vide an order dated 1.3.2012; a revision against the order of dismissal of the complaint was filed and the matter was remanded back to the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 19.3.2012. Counsel for the petitioner points out that the concerned Magistrate again passed a similar order by which the complaint of the petitioner was dismissed. Counsel also submits that another revision petitio...
Sat Veer Singh Vs. Carzonrent (India) Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: November 18, 2013 CM(M) No.977/2013, C.M. Nos.14810/2013 & 17498/2013 SUNIL CHAUDHARY Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.982/2013, C.M. Nos.14956/2013 & 17511/2013 VIJAY KUMAR JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.987/2013, C.M. Nos.14977/2013 & 17507/2013 BHAGYA NARAYAN JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.998/201...
Vimal Kumar Goyal Vs. the New India Assurance Company Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h November, 2013 % + RFA NO.530/2013 VIMAL KUMAR GOYAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Jos Chiramel & Mr. Ajay Singh, Advs. Versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Respondent RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 25.07.2013 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ)-I, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi of dismissal as time barred of suit No.402/2010 (I.D. No.02403C0243242008) filed by the appellant / plaintiff for recovery of Rs.14,40,577/-.2. Though the appeal has come up before this Court for the first time today only but the learned Additional District Judge (ADJ) having dismissed the suit claim of the appellant / plaintiff on the ground of limitation, which in the facts and circumstances enumerated herein below is more a question of law than an intertwined question of law and facts, the couns...
Shatrughan Mishra Vs. Rajeev Vij, Md, Carzonrent (India) Private Limit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: November 18, 2013 CM(M) No.977/2013, C.M. Nos.14810/2013 & 17498/2013 SUNIL CHAUDHARY Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.982/2013, C.M. Nos.14956/2013 & 17511/2013 VIJAY KUMAR JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.987/2013, C.M. Nos.14977/2013 & 17507/2013 BHAGYA NARAYAN JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.998/201...
Raju Yadav Vs. Carzonrent (India) Private Limited Thr. Its Md Raj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: November 18, 2013 CM(M) No.977/2013, C.M. Nos.14810/2013 & 17498/2013 SUNIL CHAUDHARY Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.982/2013, C.M. Nos.14956/2013 & 17511/2013 VIJAY KUMAR JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.987/2013, C.M. Nos.14977/2013 & 17507/2013 BHAGYA NARAYAN JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.998/201...
Raju Yadav Vs. Carzonrent (India) Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: November 18, 2013 CM(M) No.977/2013, C.M. Nos.14810/2013 & 17498/2013 SUNIL CHAUDHARY Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.982/2013, C.M. Nos.14956/2013 & 17511/2013 VIJAY KUMAR JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.987/2013, C.M. Nos.14977/2013 & 17507/2013 BHAGYA NARAYAN JHA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Rohit Jain, Adv. with Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Adv. versus CARZONRENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Rajat Joneja & Mr.Prashant Jain, Advs. + CM(M) No.998/201...
Sunstar Overseas Ltd. Vs. Prem Chand Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: November 18, 2013 + CM(M) No.1490/2010 SUNSTAR OVERSEAS LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Arvind Kr. Shukla, Adv. with Mr.Amit Shukla, Adv. versus PREM CHAND SHARMA Through ..... Respondent Mr.Rakesh Srivastava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed order dated 11th October 2010 passed by the Additional Rent Control Tribunal dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against the order and judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 5th February 2010 whereby the eviction petition filed by the petitioner under Section 14(1)(i) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short, called the DRC Act) was dismissed.2. Brief facts as per the case pleaded by the petitioner before the Addl. Rent Controller are that:(a) The tenanted premises is bearing No.LP-27-C, LIG flat, Pitampura, Delhi. The pet...
Dinesh Kumar Swarup Vs. Harish Chawla and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: November 18, 2013 CM(M) 1287/2010 & CM Nos.18351/2010 & 2545/2011 DINESH KUMAR SWARUP ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Dinesh K.Garg, Adv. with Mr.Dhananjay Garg & Mr.Abhishek Garg, Advs. versus HARISH CHAWLA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.S.N.Kumar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.K.B.Soni, Adv. No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the impugned order dated 20th May, 2010 whereby the learned Additional District Judge allowed the application filed by the respondent under Order 6 Rule 17 of the C.P.C seeking amendment of written statement.2. The main grievance of the Petitioner is not the amendment of Paras 12 and 13 of the Written Statement but the additional plea taken wherein the defendant has sought a prayer that the relief of possession cannot be granted against only one co-tenant, the other co-tenant, wh...
Ranu Sen Vs. Kandarpa Sen
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: November 18, 2013 + CM(M) No.1091/2012 RANU SEN Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Indrani Ghosh, Adv. versus KANDARPA SEN Through ..... Respondent Ms.Meena Kumari, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner Ranu Sen (plaintiff No.1 in the suit) wife of the respondent Kandarpa Sen (defendant No.2 in the suit) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 6th September, 2012 passed in the Civil Judge, Delhi in Suit No.391/2008.2. The facts of the case in brief are that the petitioner is the wife of the respondent who has a marital dispute with her. The father of the respondent owned a leasehold property bearing No.B-239, Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi, by virtue of his status of a displaced person from the erstwhile East Pakistan. The father of the respondent expired in 1984. After his death, the respondent ...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »