Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raghubir Kumar Dhawan Vs. M/S Swift Motors (P) Ltd. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:19. h November, 2013 + RFA4992013 & CM No.17147/2013 (for condonation of 108 days delay in filing the appeal). RAGHUBIR KUMAR DHAWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prag Chawla, Adv. Versus M/S SWIFT MOTORS (P) LTD. AND ORS Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Respondents RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 11th April, 2013 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge-15 (Central) Delhi of dismissal of CS No.48/2012 filed by the appellant for recovery of Rs.6,50,000/- with interest, on the ground of the relief claimed therein being barred by time as well as on the ground of suit being barred by Order II Rule 2 of the CPC.2. The appeal came up for hearing first on 29th October, 2013 when after hearing the counsel for the appellant/plaintiff it was prima facie observed that there was no infirmity in the impugned judgment and decree. On request of the counsel for the appel...
M/S S.S. Infrastructure Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2013 + ARB.A. 24/2013 M/S S.S INFRASTRUCTURE ..... Appellant Through: Mr Ajay Kumar, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ..... Respondent RAJIV SHAKDHER, J IA No.17921/2013 (Exemption) 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. Arb. A. 24/2013 & IA No.17920/2013 (Stay) 2. This is an appeal filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) against the order of the learned sole arbitrator, Honble Mr Justice Anil Dev Singh (Retd.), dated 22.10.2013. The said order was passed by the learned arbitrator on an application filed by the appellant herein under Section 17 of the Act. The net effect of the impugned order is that, the appellants prayer for injuncting encashment of the bank guarantee in issue, which is valued at Rs. 63.55/- lacs, stands rejected.3. To be noted, the appellant is one of the many bidders, who in the wak...
Karamvir Tyagi Vs. Delhi Agricultral Marketing Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.841/2000 19th November, 2013 % KARAMVIR TYAGI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Keshav Dayal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prahlad Dayal, Advocate. Versus Respondent DELHI AGRICULTRAL MARKETING BOARD Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner impugns the orders passed by the departmental authorities; of the disciplinary authority dated 11.1.1999 and the appellate authority dated 2.12.1999; which have imposed the punishment of dismissal from services upon the petitioner.2. Petitioner was a Sub-Inspector of the respondent No.1/Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board and was working at NFM Gate at Azadpur, New Delhi when he was found guilty of over charging the driver of vehicle No.HR-47/2531 to whom gate pass No.1925/49 was issued. Instead of charging Rs.8, Rs.15 was charged from the driver. W.P.(C) No.841/2000 accordingly issu...
Group CaptaIn (T.S) Rajeev Varshney Vs. Indian Roads Congress and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5169/2012 & CM105662012 (stay) 19th November, 2013 % GROUP CAPTAIN (T.S) RAJEEV VARSHNEY ......Petitioner Through: Mr. V.S.Tomar, Advocate. VERSUS INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner, who was appointed on probation with the respondent no.1 as Deputy Secretary (Administration), impugns the order of termination dated 9.8.2012, and the same reads as under:No.IRC:13(11)/2010 Dated 09.08.2012 OFFICE ORDER The Executive Committee of the Indian Roads Congress in its meeting held on 9th August, 2012 examined in detail the performance of Gp. Capt. Rajeev Varshney, Deputy Secretary and his contribution in the work being assigned to him does not justify for continuing with his services, and after careful consideration of ...
Vinod Kumar Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
$~17 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6878/2013 & C.M.No.14901/2013 Date of decision:19. h November, 2013 % VINOD KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Ms.Shruti Agarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr.C.M.Goyal, Adv. with Mr.Ravichandran, Team Commander, NSG W.P.(C) 7085/2013 & C.M.No.15287/2013 SATISH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Shruti Agarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms.C.M.Goyal, Adv. with Mr.Ravichandran, Team Commander, NSG CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. Counter affidavits have been placed on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no rejoinder is necessary.2. With the consent of both the parties, matter has been heard.3. The issue raised in these two writ petitions are identical and therefore are taken together for consideration. Both the petitioners have challenged their repatriation. The petitio...
Satish Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
$~17 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6878/2013 & C.M.No.14901/2013 Date of decision:19. h November, 2013 % VINOD KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Ms.Shruti Agarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr.C.M.Goyal, Adv. with Mr.Ravichandran, Team Commander, NSG W.P.(C) 7085/2013 & C.M.No.15287/2013 SATISH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Shruti Agarwal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms.C.M.Goyal, Adv. with Mr.Ravichandran, Team Commander, NSG CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. Counter affidavits have been placed on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no rejoinder is necessary.2. With the consent of both the parties, matter has been heard.3. The issue raised in these two writ petitions are identical and therefore are taken together for consideration. Both the petitioners have challenged their repatriation. The petitio...
Girish K.B. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3654/2013 Date of decision :19. h November, 2013 GIRISH K.B. Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Suresh Chand, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr.A.S. Dateer, Adv. with Ms.Rekha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner in the instant case, is working as a Constable/Driver with the Railway Protection Security Force (hereinafter referred to as `RPSF) and is currently posted with the 6th Battalion, RPSF, Daya Basti, Delhi 110 035. It is undisputed that the petitioners wife is also a railway employee who is posted as Constable with the Railway Protection Force (hereinafter referred to as `RPF), currently at Trissur in the state of Kerala. The petitioner submits that he and his wife have been blessed with a baby girl who is at present only about 18 months old. The petitioners mother is stated to be a cancer patient with nobody else to ...
Asim Chaudhary Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4836/2013 & CM Nos.10962/2013 & 10963/2013 Reserved on :31. t October, 2013 % Date of decision :19. h November, 2013 ASIM CHAUDHARY Through : ..... Petitioners Mr.Govind Jee, Adv. for Mr.Prashant Bhushan, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC for R-1/UOI Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sumit Babbar, Adv. & Mr.Vikramaditya, Adv. for FSSAI. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.1. The present writ petition assails the order dated 17th July, 2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal rejecting the petitioner's original application wherein he had prayed for the following reliefs:"a) To issue a writ of mandamus directing Resp No 1 to allow the applicant to complete his deputation in the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India as per the DoPT Rules OM No.2/99/91-Estt. (P-II) dated 5.1.1994, as amended from time to time, ...
Manvinder Singh Marwah @ Romi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 18, 2013 + BAIL APPLN. 1759/2013 MANVINDER SINGH MARWAH @ ROMI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Gandhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yogesh Saxena, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. This is an application u/s 439 of Cr.P.C. for the grant of bail in case FIR No.20/2012 under Section 21/29 NDPS Act and Section 14 of the Foreigner Act P.S. Special Cell pending before the learned ASJ, New Delhi.2. The case of the prosecution is that on the basis of secret information, the present petitioner was apprehended on 22.8.2012 at about 10.55 p.m. near Moolchand Hospital and 46 gms. of cocaine was recovered from him. As per allegations, the petitioner also disclosed that he had taken the delivery of the alleged contraband from two persons, namely, Lamba and Aik. He further disclosed that the other person Aik is presently in Delhi and on his...
Goenka and Goenka Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:13. 11.2013 Date of Decision:18. 11.2013 WP(C) No.876 of 2008 GOENKA & GOENKA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Raja Chatterjee, Ms. Runa Bhuyan, Ms. Rita Jha & Ms. Manisha P., Advs. versus UOI & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Kuljeet Rawal & Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advs. for R-3. W.P.(C) 1214/2008 BIRDY FASHION P. LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Raja Chatterjee, Ms. Runa Bhuyan, Ms. Rita Jha & Ms. Manisha P., Advs. versus UOI & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC with Mr. Roshal Lal Goel, Adv. Mr. Kuljeet Rawal & Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advs. for R-3. W.P.(C) 1216/2008 BIRDY FASHION P.LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Raja Chatterjee, Ms. Runa Bhuyan, Ms. Rita Jha & Ms. Manisha P., Advs. versus UOI & ORS Through: W.P.(C) No.876/2008&connected matters ..... Respondents Mr. Kuljeet Rawal & Mr. Jagjit Singh, Page 1 of 18 Advs. for R-3. + W.P.(C) 1217/2008 GOENKA & GOENKA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Raja...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »