Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Goyal Estate and Promoters Pvt Ltd Vs. Nirupa Berry
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
$~A20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:19. 11.2013 CS(OS) 1872/2013 M/S GOYAL ESTATE & PROMOTERS PVT LTD..... Plaintiff Through Mr. S.K. Bhaduri and Ms.Kiran Dharam, Advocates versus NIRUPA BERRY ..... Defendant Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Bhagat, Mr.Gaurav Sharma and Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.15589/2013 (u/O39Rules 1 and 2 CPC) 1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of possession in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant regarding property No.15, Shakuntala Farm situated in Khasra No.93 (4-16) and 94 (4-16), total measuring 9 bighas 12 biswas, Village Sultanpur, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi and also seeking other reliefs.2. It is the claim of the plaintiff that it had purchased the suit property from the erstwhile owner M/s. Britika Export Pvt. Ltd. vide sale deed dated 15.10.1986. Thereafter, construction was carried out. I...
Vakil Kumar Meena Vs. the Director Export Inspection Council of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.5101/2012 & W.P.(C)5102/2012 19th November, 2013 + WP(C) 5101/2012 VAKIL KUMAR MEENA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. S.N.Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS THE DIRECTOR EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL OF INDIA ...... Respondent Through: Mr. L.R.Khatana, Advocate. + WP(C) 5102/2012 HARI PRASAD MEENA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. S.N.Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS THE DIRECTOR EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL OF INDIA ...... Respondent Through: Mr. L.R.Khatana, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.5101/2012 1. By this writ petition the petitioner seeks the relief of appointment to the post of Technical Officer of the respondent no.1 on the ground that petitioner while filling up the attestation form by mistake/haste did not give the correct particulars that he was in fact convicted in a criminal case and a fine was imposed. Petitioner claims that he filled up the form by ...
Danesh Khan Vs. Jamia Hamdard University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2235/2012 19th November, 2013 % DANESH KHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sarwar Raza, Advocate. Versus JAMIA HAMDARD UNIVERSITY Respondent Through: Mr. Sudeep Dey, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner applied for the post of Laboratory Technician (Senior Scale) with the respondent/Jamia Hamdard University. Petitioner was declared successful in the selection process however petitioner was not allowed to join duties because according to the respondent the petitioner was not medically fit. Petitioner questions this action of the respondent in denying him employment by stating that he is not medically fit.2. A reading of the writ petition shows that pursuant to the directions of the respondent/University petitioner reported to one Dr. Anwar Habib, an empanelled doctor of the respondent/University, and who opined on 28.2.2011 that in view of ...
Union of India Vs. Whale Graphics (India) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO2542013 & FAO2572013 Decided on :19. h November, 2013 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Adv. versus WHALE GRAPHICS (INDIA) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) CM No.9255/2013 (Condonation of Delay) in FAO2542013 CM No.9316/2013 (Condonation of Delay) in FAO2572013 1. These appeals have been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. There is an application in each of the matters seeking condonation of delay of 19 days in refiling the appeals. The reasons for the delay are given in the applications as unavoidable reasons. The details of these reasons are stated to be that on 11.04.2013, an appeal was filed vide diary no.56789 of 2013. However certain objections were raised by the Registry as a consequence of which the appeal was collected back on 15.04.2013. One of the main objections which were raised by the Registry was non attachment of the cer...
M/S Praveen Fps Store and ors Vs. Commissioner Food and Supplies and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:19. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 6702/2013 M/S PRAVEEN FPS STORE & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Yogesh Kumar, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER FOOD & SUPPLIES AND ANR..Respondent Through: Ms Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for GNCTD along with Mr Surendra Kumar, Assistant Commissioner, FPS Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner is challenging the notification dated 27.09.2009, issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi, inviting applications for issue of authorization to the Fair Price Shops under Public Distribution System in South District. As many as seven vacancies have been advertised by the respondents in Circle 46. The grievance of the petitioners is that at present the number of ration cards allocated to them is below 1000, which is the number specified in this regard in the guidelines framed by the Government of NCT of Delhi.2. The guidelines dated 27.08.1997, to the extent they are ...
Anil Taneja and anr. Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. t October, 2013 DECIDED ON :19. h November, 2013 + CRL.A. 473/2000 ANIL TANEJA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav, Mr.Lokesh Chandra & Mr.M.Shamikh, Advocates. VERSUS STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Anil Taneja (A-1) and Madan Lal (A-2) challenge their conviction in case FIR No.256/1998 registered at PS Moti Nagar in Sessions Case No.112/1998. By a judgment dated 17th July, 2000 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judgment, they were held guilty under Sections 304 and 323 IPC respectively. A-1, in addition, was convicted under Section 27 Arms Act. By an order dated 19.07.2000, A-1 was awarded various prison terms with fine while A-2 was released on probation. The prosecution case emerged out of the record is as under:- 2. On 26.06.1998 at about 12.30 a.m. at shop No.26-27, Subzi Market, Moti Nagar, an alte...
Gulfam @ Ghoda Shah Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :6. h November, 2013 DECIDED ON :19. h November, 2013 + CRL.A. 379/2002 GULFAM @ GHODA SHAH ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Seema Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Ankit Gupta, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant (Gulfam @ Ghoda Shah) impugns a judgment dated 21.03.2002 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.3/2001 arising out of FIR No.138/2000 registered at Police Station Chandni Mahal holding him guilty for the offences under Sections 367/377/506/342/34 IPC. By an order dated 01.04.2002, he was awarded Rigorous Imprisonment for three years with fine `1,000/- under Section 367 IIPC; five years with fine with fine `5000/- under Section 377 IPC; one year with fine `500/- under Section 342 IPC and two years with fine `1,000/- under Section 506 IPC. All the sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Allegations against th...
Neha Gogia Vs. Medical Council of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:19.11.2013 W.P.(C) No.3861/2012 ..Petitioner NEHA GOGIA Through:Mr.Arvind Kumar Gupta and Mr.Abhishek Goyal, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ..Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Kumar, Advocate for respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court, having studied from DPS International School, New Delhi appeared in the `A level examination conducted by University of Cambridge and obtained Grade `D in Chemistry and Grade `E in Physics and Biology. The petitioner took admission in the MBBS Course of International University of Health and Sciences, School of Medicine, St.Kitts, West Indies in February, 2007. In May, 2007, she applied to Medical Council of India for grant of Eligibility Certificate. The said Certificate, however, was refused vide letter dated 23.4.2008, on the ground that the marks obtained by the petitioner in Physics, Chemistry and Biology taken togethe...
Sh. Kirti Pardeep Sood and ors Vs. Shri Keshav Sood
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A. No.8034/2011 (O.VII R.11 CPC) in CS(OS) 2363/2008 Reserved on:2. d September, 2013 Decided on:19. h November, 2013 % SH. KIRTI PARDEEP SOOD & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate for Plaintiff No.1. versus SHRI KESHAV SOOD Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By this application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC the Defendant seeks rejection of the plaint on the plea of res-judicata. The objection of the Defendant is that in earlier suit for partition filed between the parties a decree was passed on 7th August, 1981 and thereafter the Plaintiffs filed the execution petition belatedly which was dismissed. The Appeal against the order of dismissal of the said execution petition was also dismissed and the same has attained finality till the Honble Supreme Court. Since the execution of the decree passed has already been declined, th...
Niranjan Jayantilal Shah Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:19. h NOVEMBER, 2013 + BAIL APPLN. 1202/2013 NIRANJAN JAYANTILAL SHAH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Das, Advocate versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail.2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that respondent had filed a criminal complaint against the petitioner and others which is pending before the Special Judge, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Cases, Saket Courts, New Delhi being S.C. No.09A/12 for the offences punishable under Section 9A, 25A and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) on the allegations that on 15th December, 2011 on the basis of secret information the officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) have ...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »