Delhi Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Yusuf Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :27. h November, 2013 + CRL.A. 469/2000 MOHD. YUSUF ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Mohd.Yusuf (the appellant) and Charanjeet @ Bittoo were arrested in case FIR No.261/1997 under Sections 393/307/397/34 IPC registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh and sent for trial on the allegations that on 23.04.1997 at about 09.00 P.M. in front of House No.AH-61, Shalimar Bagh, they attempted to rob Inderjit Kapoor while armed with country made revolvers. Mohd.Yusuf fired from the revolver and attempted to murder Ct.Shambhu Dayal who chased him after the robbery attempt. First Information Report was lodged after recording Inderjit Kapoors statement (Ex.PW3/A) at 10.50 P.M. The appellant was caught hold at the spot by the police officials whereas Charanjeet @ Bittoo fled the spot. Statements of the...
M/S. Precision Steels Vs. Reeta Salwan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2013. + RFA5542013 M/S. PRECISION STEELS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sangmitra Sawant, Advocate. Versus REETA SALWAN Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjiv Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mrs. Renuka Arora and Mr. Kunal Kohli, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 8th November, 2013 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-06, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS No.139/2012 filed by the respondent/plaintiff) on admissions, of ejectment of the appellant from property No.104, Rewari Line Industrial Area, Phase I, also known as Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi, earlier in the tenancy of the appellant under the respondent/plaintiff.2. Though this is a first appeal and comes up for the first time today but since the counsel for the respondent/plaintiff has appeared on cav...
Shri Bhagwan Dass Vs. Indian Airlines Limited and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2775/2000 27th November, 2013 % SHRI BHAGWAN DASS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. V. Shekhar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishal Saxena, Advocate. Versus INDIAN AIRLINES LIMITED AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Advocate with Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks the relief of being appointed as an Assistant Civil Engineer in the pay band of Rs.22853395/- on account of his being selected in the selection process for direct appointment to the post which commenced as per the advertisement dated 25.7.1991 and culminated in the petitioner being selected by the selection board on 30.6.1992 and proceedings of the selection board being approved on 2.12.1992 by the competent authority being the Chairman-cumManaging Director of respondent no.1.2. At the outset, I may state that counsel...
Bhim SaIn Gupta (Since Deceased, Thr Lrs) Vs. Dda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.259/2013 Date of Decision :27. 11.2013 BHIM SAIN GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED, THR LRS) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Y.S. Chauhan, Advocate. versus DDA ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellants, who are the legal heirs of the original plaintiff Sh.Bhim Sain Gupta, against the judgment dated 17.07.2013 passed by the learned ADJ dismissing the appeal of the appellants on the ground of the same being hopelessly barred by the period of limitation as the delay of approximately 2400 days in preferring the appeal before the learned ADJ was not condoned.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants and gone through the record.3. Briefly stated, the case filed by the original plaintiff Sh.Bhim Sain Gupta before the learned Civil Judge was for a decree of possession and mandatory injunction in the year 1990 where he had alleged that he was in possession of a s...
Sonu Gautam @ Amit Kumar Vs. Prasad Saheb and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
$~08. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 836/2013 % Judgment dated 27.11.2013 SONU GAUTAM @ AMIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Lal Bahadur Pandey, Adv. along with petitioner. versus PRASAD SAHEB & ORS Through : ..... Respondents Ms.Deepa Kathpalia, Adv. for respondents no.1 to 4. Mr.Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. By the present petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 17.11.2011 whereby the application/complaint of the petitioner, being Complaint Case No.12412/2011, made under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, North-East District, Delhi. The petitioner also seeks setting aside of the order dated 27.8.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-03 (NE), whereby Revision Petition No.2/2012 filed by the petitioner against the order dated 17.11.2011, was dismissed.2. It may be noticed that in this case the petitioner has implea...
Shri Babu Lal Vs. Lic Housing Finance Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.260/2013 and CM No.18850/2013 Date of Decision :27. 11.2013 SHRI BABU LAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Mahesh K.Chaudhary, Advocate. versus LIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the order dated 09.09.2013 passed by the learned ADJ in RCA No.14/2012.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant.3. The learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to show that the present appeal involves any substantial question of law.4. The appellant had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the respondent. The said suit was dismissed by the trial court on 16.01.2012 holding that no such declaration can be issued. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant preferred an appeal before the learned ADJ.The learned first appellate court dismissed the appeal. Still not feeling satisfied, the present regula...
Sanjeev Gupta Vs. Sanjay Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4385/2013 and CRL.M.A. 15684/2013 Date of decision :27. h November, 2013 % SANJEEV GUPTA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Jain, Adv. versus SANJAY ANAND Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Muneesh Malhotra and Mr. Achin Mittal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 10 th September, 2013 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge allowed the respondents revision petition challenging the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Trial Court.2. The brief relevant facts relating to this case are as under:- (i) On 5th September, 2011, the petitioner instituted the complaint under Sections 138 to 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari District Court, Delhi on the following averments:(a) The respondent placed an order to supply fabric of CDC print on the petitioner in pursuance to which the petitioner supplied the...
Capt. N.C. JaIn Vs. Air India Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:26. 11.2013 WP(C) No.5569 of 2012 & CM No.11360 of 2012 CAPT. N.C. JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.K. Rohatgi, Adv. versus AIR INDIA LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court is a retired employee of the respondent-Air India Limited and is entitled to avail the Medical Benefit Scheme of Air India Limited, which covers not only the serving but also the retired employees of the said organization. The petitioner who is now aged about 68 years was examined in Tata Memorial Hospital and found to be suffering from Carcinoma Prostate. He underwent surgery on 23.3.2007, followed by post operative External Radiation Therapy from 20.10.2008 to 4.12.2008. He was, however, advised to consult a Urologist for further management of urinary incontinence. The petitioner was then examined by Dr. T.B. Yuvaraja, Consultant...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Neelam Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. h November, 2013 + MAC. APP. No.162/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate. Versus NEELAM SINGH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.R.K.Giri, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC. APP. No.162/2012 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 07.09.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted a compensation of Rs.18,01,050/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum in favour of the respondents/claimants from the date of filing the claim petition, i.e., 18.10.2008 till its realization minus the period from 09.09.2009 to 17.02.2010 in terms of order dated 09.09.2009.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company submits that for a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the claimants have to prove the negligence on the part of the driver ...
Union of India Vs. Jagdish Chand Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 11.2013 FAO(OS) 542/2013 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant versus JAGDISH CHAND GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr J.K. Singh. For the Respondent : None. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No.18619/2014 (Exemption) The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM No.18616/2013 (delay) The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. FAO(OS) 542/2013 & CM No.18617/2013 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.07.2013 delivered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in OMP No.240/2013, which was a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the appellant herein. The appellant has challenged the majority award dated 17.09.2012. The learned Single Judge, by virtue of the impugned judgment had dismissed the appellants petition and the challeng...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »