Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjiv Mahajan Vs. Kishore Kumar Khanna and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A.142/2013 & I.A. 14181/2013 in CS(OS)1301/2002 Date of Decision:29. 10.2013 SANJIV MAHAJAN Through: ...PLAINTIFF Mr. V.B.Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Priyanka Sharma, Adv. Versus KISHORE KUMAR KHANNA AND ORS. Through: ...DEFENDANTS Mr. Girdhar Govind, Adv. with Mr. Noor Alam, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.I.A. 142/2013 of the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC and I.A. 14181/2013 of the defendant under Section 151 CPC1 The defendants had filed an affidavit of evidence along with large number of copies of documents. The plaintiff filed application being I.A. 142/2013 objecting to taking on record of the affidavit of evidence and the documents. The defendant filed I.A. 14181/2013 seeking condonation of delay in filing affidavit and documents. The respective applications were replied and contested by the parties.2. The defendants submit that vide order dated 5th November, 2012 this Court directed them to file affidavit of evi...
Union of India Vs. A.M.Mishra and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h October, 2013 % + RFA5322004 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC with Mr. R.P. Singh, Advs. Versus A.M.MISHRA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 1 st April, 2004 of the Addl. District Judge, Delhi of dismissal of Suit No.115/2002 filed by the appellant for recovery of Rs.16,11,569.44p jointly and severally from the three defendants/respondents.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the Trial Court record requisitioned. The appellant/plaintiff did not take any steps for service of the respondents/defendant and vide order dated 27 th February, 2007 last opportunity was given to the appellant/plaintiff with the direction that if the appellant/plaintiff did not take steps the appeal shall be dismissed for non- prosecution. Thereafter, though steps were taken but ineffective. Ult...
Dr. M.S. Frank Vs. Delhi University and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.9037/2011 29th October, 2013 % DR. M.S. FRANK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Mathews, Advocate and Mr. Aditya Shukla, Advocate. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ORS. Through: Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the action initiated by the employer/St. Stephens College (represented by respondent nos. 3 and4) of initiating, continuing and concluding departmental proceedings pursuant to the Memorandum of Charges dated 01.12.2011 issued against the petitioner.2. In sum and substance what the petitioner argues is that since the respondent No.5/Principal is the main complainant with respect to the articl...
Smt. Vibha Vs. Sh. Rama Nand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 10.2013 + MAT. APP. (F.C.) NO.30 OF2013& CM13301OF2013SMT. VIBHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Maninder Singh, Mr.Vivek Chaudhary, Mr.Ajay Pipaniya, Mr.Rohit Arora, Ms.Ekta Vats and Mr.Mandeep Singh, Advocates versus SH. RAMA NAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Manoj Lohat, Mr.Y.P.Luckaria, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (Open Court) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 9th May, 2013 of the Family Court, disposing off GP no.12/2010. Those proceedings have been initiated by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as grandfather), for the custody of the minor child named Lakshay.2. The brief facts of the case are that marriage between Late Anipal and the present appellant/Vibha (hereinafter referred by her name) solemnized on 07.12.1996. Out of the said wedlock, one male child Lakshay was born on 14th August, 1998. Unfortun...
Nyaya Bhoomi Vs. Commissioner Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 05, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: October 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8683/2011 NYAYA BHOOMI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Lt.Col.B.B.Sharan. versus COMMISSIONER MCD AND ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for GNCT. Mr.Ajay Arora, Advocate with Mr.Kuldeep Singh Rathor, Advocate for MCD. Mr.Sumeet Pushkarana, Advocate with Ms.Ruchika Advocate for DJB. Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Advocate for EDMC. Mr.Arvind Sah, Advocate for NDMC. Mr.Amitabh Marwah, Advocate for DDA. Mr.Rajeev Sharma, And Ms.Phaguni N. Lal, Advocates for Director Doordarshan. W.P.(C) 3416/2012 ANTAR RASHTRIYA MANAV ADHIKAAR NIGRAANI PARISHAD ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Shobha and Ms.Jyoti Rana, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum,Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for GNCT. Mr.Ajay Arora, Advocate with Mr.Kuldeep Singh Rathor, Advocate...
Uday Foundation for Congenital Defects and Rare Bl Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: October 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8568/2010 UDAY FOUNDATION FOR CONGENITAL DEFECTS AND RARE BLOOD GROUPS ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr.Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr.Amit Saxena, Advocate along with Mr.Kapil Rustagi, Ms.Shilpa Nair, Mr.Sanyat Lodha, Ms.Aakanksha Kaul, Advocates versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Merha, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Mr.Ramneek Mishra and Mr.Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates for UOI Ms.Monika Garg, Advocate for R-5 Mr.Ashok Desai, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ajay Kohli and Ms.Ph.Sarvodaya Lakshi, Advocates for NRAI. Dr.A.M.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Dheeraj Nair, Mr.Divyam Agarwal and Mr.Amit Bhandari, Advocates for R-7 Mr.Mukul Rohtagi, Mr.S.Ganesh and Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocates with Ms.Kanika Agnihotri and Mr.Karan Minocha, Advocates for R-8/RAI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NAND...
Santosh Dutta Vs. Surender Krishan Bali and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.1199 of 2006 Reserved on: September 13, 2013 Decision on: October 29, 2013 SANTOSH DUTTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. S.K. Bhaduri, Advocate. versus SURENDER KRISHAN BALI & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Senior Advocate with Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Mr. Ritesh Mehra and Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advocates for Defendant No.1. Mr. Prag Chawla, Advocate for Defendants 2 and 3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2910.2013 1. The present suit was filed on 29th August 2005 by late Smt. Santosh Dutta, daughter of late Shri Bal Krishan Bali and late Smt. Kaushalya Bali (now represented by her legal representatives (LRs) against her siblings Shri Surender Krishan Bali, Defendant No.1, Yogesh Ahuja, Defendant No.2 and Smt. Anju, Defendant No.3 (both of whom are the children of her deceased sister Smt. Kailash Ahuja and are residing in the United States of America). The relief sought in the suit is for seeking declaration of her 1/3rd sha...
Dhiraj Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. News Boradcasting Standard Authority and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:29. 10.2013 + W.P.(C) 3087/2012 DHIRAJ KUMAR 'BHARADWAJ' ..... Petitioner Through: None. versus NEWS BORADCASTING STANDARD AUTHORITY AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Apurv Chandola, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Kapil Kher, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court is aggrieved from telecast of an ad film titled Third Eye of Nirmal Baba. In the aforesaid film, according to the petitioner, Nirmal Baba advises his devotees to eat Samosa or Red Chatni or patties, to remove photos of ancestors from the place of worship. According to the petitioner, on seeing the film his family members and various other members of the public started eating the materials suggested by Nirmal Baba. It is further alleged in the petition that in many advertisements Nirmal Baba suggests the member of public to remove Shivlingas from their house as well as pictures from the place of worship ...
Upsc Vs. Major Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:29. 10.2013 + WP(C) No.6508 of 2010 UPSC ..... Petitioner Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Through: versus MAJOR SINGH ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The respondent before this Court sought the following information from the petitioner:a. Particulars (name, qualification & experience) of (eligible) applicants for appointment to 7 post of Principal (Female) reserved for SC in response to UPSC special advertisement No.52/2006. b. Criteria adopted for shot listing the candidates summoned for interview by UPSC to the 7 posts at (a) above. c. List of candidates summoned for interview by UPSC for (a) above. d. Criteria adopted by UPSC for shot listing the SC candidates summoned for interview for 1 post of Principal (Directorate of Education), Delhi reserved for SC (female) candidate in August, 2006. The CPIO provided the information at serial Nos.2 & 4 but the information at serial...
Uoi and ors. Vs. Abhishekh Dixit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 06, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: October 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7290/2008 UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Prakash Gautam and Mr.Vivek Ojha, Advocates. versus ABHISHEKH DIXIT Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.M.Shoeb Alam, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-4. Mr.Anil Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Anuj Kumar Ranjan, Advocate for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The above captioned writ petition challenges the order dated January 03, 2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal allowing OA No.1920/2007 by quashing the order dated June 04, 2007 issued by the Director, SVP, National Police Academy to the extent it concerned the respondent and directed the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to consider the allocation of cadre to the respondent in accordance with the principles laid down i...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »