Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pankaj Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
$~R-10 to 12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 358/2005 % Judgment dated 30.10.2013 PANKAJ Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Inderjeet Singh Kapur, Ms.Kamini Arora and Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Advs. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A.No.357/2005 DHARMENDER Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Inderjeet Singh Kapur, Ms.Kamini Arora and Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Advs. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A.NO.361/2005 PAWAN Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Inderjeet Singh Kapur, Ms.Kamini Arora and Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Advs. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeals are directed against the judgment dated 23.3.2005 and order on conviction dated 28.3.2005 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the appellants have been directed to undergo four years Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) with fine of R...
Pawan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
$~R-10 to 12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 358/2005 % Judgment dated 30.10.2013 PANKAJ Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Inderjeet Singh Kapur, Ms.Kamini Arora and Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Advs. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A.No.357/2005 DHARMENDER Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Inderjeet Singh Kapur, Ms.Kamini Arora and Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Advs. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A.NO.361/2005 PAWAN Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Inderjeet Singh Kapur, Ms.Kamini Arora and Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Advs. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeals are directed against the judgment dated 23.3.2005 and order on conviction dated 28.3.2005 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the appellants have been directed to undergo four years Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) with fine of R...
Dharmender Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
$~R-10 to 12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 358/2005 % Judgment dated 30.10.2013 PANKAJ Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Inderjeet Singh Kapur, Ms.Kamini Arora and Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Advs. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A.No.357/2005 DHARMENDER Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Inderjeet Singh Kapur, Ms.Kamini Arora and Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Advs. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A.NO.361/2005 PAWAN Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Inderjeet Singh Kapur, Ms.Kamini Arora and Mr.Jaspreet Singh Kapur, Advs. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeals are directed against the judgment dated 23.3.2005 and order on conviction dated 28.3.2005 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the appellants have been directed to undergo four years Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) with fine of R...
Maharani Bagh Co-operative House Building and Welfar Vs. Govt. of Nct ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 05, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: October 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8683/2011 NYAYA BHOOMI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Lt.Col.B.B.Sharan. versus COMMISSIONER MCD AND ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for GNCT. Mr.Ajay Arora, Advocate with Mr.Kuldeep Singh Rathor, Advocate for MCD. Mr.Sumeet Pushkarana, Advocate with Ms.Ruchika Advocate for DJB. Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Advocate for EDMC. Mr.Arvind Sah, Advocate for NDMC. Mr.Amitabh Marwah, Advocate for DDA. Mr.Rajeev Sharma, And Ms.Phaguni N. Lal, Advocates for Director Doordarshan. W.P.(C) 3416/2012 ANTAR RASHTRIYA MANAV ADHIKAAR NIGRAANI PARISHAD ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Shobha and Ms.Jyoti Rana, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum,Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for GNCT. Mr.Ajay Arora, Advocate with Mr.Kuldeep Singh Rathor, Advocate...
Atender Yadav Vs. State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 10.2013 + CRL.A. 1340/2010 ATENDER YADAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate Appellant produced from custody versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) the appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 20.09.2010 and 23.09.2010 respectively passed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, West Distt., Delhi, thereby convicting the appellant for committing an offence under Section 376(2) (f) of India Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life together with fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default thereof to undergo further simple imprisonment ...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Delhi Jal Board and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 05, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: October 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8683/2011 NYAYA BHOOMI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Lt.Col.B.B.Sharan. versus COMMISSIONER MCD AND ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for GNCT. Mr.Ajay Arora, Advocate with Mr.Kuldeep Singh Rathor, Advocate for MCD. Mr.Sumeet Pushkarana, Advocate with Ms.Ruchika Advocate for DJB. Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Advocate for EDMC. Mr.Arvind Sah, Advocate for NDMC. Mr.Amitabh Marwah, Advocate for DDA. Mr.Rajeev Sharma, And Ms.Phaguni N. Lal, Advocates for Director Doordarshan. W.P.(C) 3416/2012 ANTAR RASHTRIYA MANAV ADHIKAAR NIGRAANI PARISHAD ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Shobha and Ms.Jyoti Rana, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum,Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for GNCT. Mr.Ajay Arora, Advocate with Mr.Kuldeep Singh Rathor, Advocate...
J.D.Tiwari Vs. Central Provident Fund Commissioner and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: October 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5825/2012 J.D.TIWARI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Jitesh Pandey, Advocate versus CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMISSIONER & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Aparna Bhat, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Writ petitioner retired as a Director, official language under Employees Provident Fund Organization on April 30, 2008. 13 days prior, on April 17, 2008 he was promoted on ad-hoc basis to the post of Director. His pay in the post of Director was fixed on April 29, 2008 in pay scale of `12000-375-16500 with effect from April 18, 2008 and on same day his monthly pension was fixed at `9,860/- and after obtaining commutation of 40% in the pension, the commuted pension was fixed at `5,916/-.2. One Yadhuvansh Narayan working as a Hindi translator had approached the Patna Bench of the Tribunal seeking upgr...
Staff Selection Commission Vs. Ravinder Malik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: October 29, 2013 W.P.(C) 6794/2013 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.S.M.Arif, Advocate versus RAVINDER MALIK ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Ahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.14746/2013 Allowed; subject to just exceptions. WP(C) 6794/2013 1. The respondent was a candidate for the Post of Inspector (Central Excise), recruitment whereof was entrusted to the Staff Selection Commission. A Combined Graduate Level Examination (Tier-I) and (TierII) was to be taken by the candidates. Tier-II examination was in two parts: Paper-1 and Paper-2.2. The answers had to be by shading the box of the applicable answer from, out of the options available as per the OMR answer sheet.3. Pertaining to the Tier-II examination, the respondent coded the OMR answer sheet with reference to his ticket number b...
Central Bank of India Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:29. 10.2013 + W.P.(C) 4190/2013 CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogesh Pachauri, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Sweety Manchanda, CGSC. Counsel for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The respondent No.2 before this Court, who is the brother of respondent No.3, Sonia Mendiratta, sought the following information from the CPIO of the petitioner-Central Bank of India:1. On what date this loan was disbursed?.2. On which property/stock/security the said loan/money was given to Think Communication at G-23, Triveni Complex.3. Whether Sonia Mendiratta had information you that this is a disputed/suit property and there is a stay granted by the Honble High Court of Delhi vide order dated 14.09.2006. 2. The information was denied by the PIO on the ground that the said information was exempt from disclosure under Section 8 (1) (j) of the ...
D.B. Madaan Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7481/2008 29th October, 2013 % D.B. MADAAN Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Arti Mahajan, Adv. Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Jagat Arora and Mr. Rajat Arora, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner who superannuated from the respondent-bank on 30.06.2007, impugns the departmental proceedings initiated against him in terms of the chargesheet post retirement dated 06.10.2008. Petitioner also prays for directions against the respondent no.1bank to make payment of the retiremental benefits alongwith interest.2. The following admitted facts in the present case be noted: (i) The show cause notice was issued to petitioner on 30.05.2007 asking the petitioner to show cause as to why disciplinary proceedings should not be initiated. (ii) Petitioner replied to the show cause notice in terms of the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »