Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anoop Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 24, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: October 30, 2013 + WP (C) 3701/2002 ANOOP SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Mirza Amir Baig, Advocate for Mr.Anjum Javed, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The present writ petition lays a challenge to the order dated August 31, 2001 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No.2656/1999 upholding penalty of dismissal from service upon the petitioner for habitual and unauthorized absence.2. Enrolled as a Constable with Delhi Police in the year 1988, as of the year 1996 the petitioner was posted in the VI Battalion of the Delhi Armed Police. He was detailed for an induction course at the Main Security Lines. The course being over on June 02, 1996 he was relieved vide DD No.24 with a direct...
Mohammed Jafar and ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: October 23, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: October 30, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2784/2013 MOHAMMED JAFAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Imtiaz Ahmad, Advocate with Ms.Bushra Faridi, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Meenal Kashyap, Advocate with Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Advocate for R-1 Mr.M.K.Mishra, Advocate for R-4 Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate with Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for R-5 Mr.B.Mahapatra, Advocate for R-7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The writ petition raises a concern of sewage being discharged into Najafgarh drain, in which rain water has to flow from the catchment area to river Yamuna. The petition brings out the problem of sewage flowing in Najafgarh drain in the form of release of Methane Gas and Sulphur Dioxide creating health hazard for people in neighbourhood. The residents of Dwar...
Flow Well Plast. Chem. Pvt. Ld. Vs. the New India Assurance Company Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. h October, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 802/2011 FLOW WELL PLAST. CHEM. PVT. LD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Pandey, Advocate. Versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.N. Parashar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 802/2011 1. Vide the instant appeal, the appellant is assailing the order of the learned Tribunal dated 07.06.2011, whereby, while awarding compensation, the respondent No.1/Insurance Company was exonerated from the liability; and the appellant and respondent No.3/driver of the offending vehicle were held liable to pay the compensation amount.2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it is established that the accident had taken place on 22.02.2007. R1W2 from the Licensing Authority has proved that the driving licence of responde...
Chander Bhushan Dubey and anr. Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:21. 10.2013 Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 4963/2007 & CMs 9271/2007 &683/2010 SHIV PATTI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8785/2007 & CM Nos.2835/2009 & 6507/2009 R.C.GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 9148/2007 AVINASH CHAND GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8786/2007 & CM Nos.2833/2009,6506/2009 PARVEZ AHMED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR + ..... Respondent Thr...
All India Cpwd Engineers Association and anr. Vs. Union of India and o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on October 21, 2013 Judgment Delivered on October30, 2013 + W.P.(C) 430/2013 All INDIA CPWD ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Vinay Kr.Garg, Advocate with Mr.Fazal Ahmad, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Joginder Sukhija, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The petitioners impugn order dated November 27, 2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.396/2012 whereby the claim for Assistant Engineers to be placed in Pay Band 3 with Grade Pay of `5400/- is rejected.2. The brief facts are the 6th Central Pay Commission, which is an expert body, was constituted to recommend pay structure etc. of Central Government employees. In para 7.46.12 of its recommendation it had made a specific recommendation for Assistant Engineers of CPWD to place the...
Harinam Singh and anr Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:21. 10.2013 Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 4963/2007 & CMs 9271/2007 &683/2010 SHIV PATTI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8785/2007 & CM Nos.2835/2009 & 6507/2009 R.C.GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 9148/2007 AVINASH CHAND GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8786/2007 & CM Nos.2833/2009,6506/2009 PARVEZ AHMED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR + ..... Respondent Thr...
Anil Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % W.P. (CRL.) 940/2013 + Date of Decision:30. h October, 2013 # ANIL KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner ! Through: Mr. Vikram Chaudhri, Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. Hari Har Guin & Mr. Abhas Mishra, Advocates versus $ UOI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari & Mr.Ramneek Mishra, Advocates * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: The petitioner, by means of this writ petition, challenges the detention order dated 23.09.2009 issued by Ms. Rasheda Hussain, Joint Secretary to the Government of India in exercise of the powers under Section 3(1) of the Conservation W.P. (CRL.) 940/2013 of Foreign Exchange and Prevention Smuggling Activities Act,1974(hereinafter referred to as COFEPOSA Act) pursuant to which his brother Sh. Raj Kumar Aggarwal has been detained and kept in custody I Central Jail, Tihar, New Delhi. The petitioners brother Sh. Raj Kumar Aggarwal(hereinaf...
Parvez Ahmed Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:21. 10.2013 Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 4963/2007 & CMs 9271/2007 &683/2010 SHIV PATTI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8785/2007 & CM Nos.2835/2009 & 6507/2009 R.C.GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 9148/2007 AVINASH CHAND GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8786/2007 & CM Nos.2833/2009,6506/2009 PARVEZ AHMED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR + ..... Respondent Thr...
M/S Tika Ram Dinesh Kumar Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 6839 of 2013 & CM No.14831 of 2013 M/S TIKA RAM DINESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Mr. Parinav Gupta, Ms. Aarti S., Mr. Vishal Gupta & Ms. Poonam M., Advs. versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anjum Javed & Mr. Mirza Amir B., Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court holds FPS License No.7133 for sale of various food articles such as wheat, rice and sugar. An inspection of the premises of the petitioner was carried out on 13.7.2013 in the presence of the petitioner and certain records were seized. The case of the respondents is that during the aforesaid inspection, the following deficiencies were found by the inspecting team: SFAs Wheat Rice Sugar Qty. As per stock register (in Qtls.) 34.26 Qtls. 14.44 Qtls. 29.22 Qtls. Qty. As per physical verification (in Qtls.) 37.96 Qtls. 15.71 Qtls. 2...
Ajay Kumar Gulati Vs. Pushpender Nath Pandey and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 3381/2011 AJAY KUMAR GULATI ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person. versus PUSHPENDER NATH PANDEY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms Kittu Bajaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court submitted an application dated 3010.2008 to the CPIO of the respondent-State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur seeking the following information:1. Please convey the name and designation of the Officer who audited the Amar Colony Branch of the State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur on 15.11.1990.2. Please convey the exact period of audit of the Amar Colony Branch i.e., from 15.11.1990 to which date.3. Please convey the status of the Audit Report i.e. what were the findings recorded by the Auditors.4. Please convey the names and designations of the officers working in the Amar Colony branch as on 15.11.1990.5. Please convey the name and designation of the Officer wh...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »