Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Veecon Media and Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Prasar Bharati and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 + WP(C) No.6854 of 2013 & CM148572013 VEECON MEDIA & BROADCASTING PVT. LTD. ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. With Ms. Enatoli Sema, Advs. Versus PRASAR BHARATI & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma and Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, Advs. For R-1& 2 Ms. Sweety Manchanda, CGSC with Mr. Debashis Mukherjee, Adv. For R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) Vide Press Advertisement issued in August, 2013, the respondent Prasar Bharati invited applications to fill up vacant slots on the DTH Service of Doordarshan DD-Direct Plus through e-Auction system to be conducted on 13th August, 2013. The number of slots to be filled up in the aforesaid e-Auction, however, were not indicated in the said Press Advertisement. Vide another Press Advertisement, Prasar Bharti invited applications to fill up the vacant slots on the aforesaid DTH Doordarshan DD-Direct Plus through e-...
Akansha Gupta and ors Vs. University of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 7269/2012 AKANSHA GUPTA AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr R.K. Saini, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. And + W.P.(C) 7270/2012 DEEPAK DABAS AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr R.K. Saini, Adv. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioners before this Court were the students of the School of Open Learning, University of Delhi, in its undergraduate courses. They appeared in the final year examination held in May-June, 2012 and even before declaration of their result, they appeared in the entrance examination for admission to various post graduate courses of the University of Delhi, since, under the Rules of the University, they were entitled to appear in the said test, while awaiting the result of their qualifying exam...
Shiv Patti Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:21. 10.2013 Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 4963/2007 & CMs 9271/2007 &683/2010 SHIV PATTI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8785/2007 & CM Nos.2835/2009 & 6507/2009 R.C.GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 9148/2007 AVINASH CHAND GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8786/2007 & CM Nos.2833/2009,6506/2009 PARVEZ AHMED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR + ..... Respondent Thr...
Deepak Dabas and ors Vs. University of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 7269/2012 AKANSHA GUPTA AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr R.K. Saini, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. And + W.P.(C) 7270/2012 DEEPAK DABAS AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr R.K. Saini, Adv. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioners before this Court were the students of the School of Open Learning, University of Delhi, in its undergraduate courses. They appeared in the final year examination held in May-June, 2012 and even before declaration of their result, they appeared in the entrance examination for admission to various post graduate courses of the University of Delhi, since, under the Rules of the University, they were entitled to appear in the said test, while awaiting the result of their qualifying exam...
D.C.Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % D.C.MEHTA W.P.(C) No.2055/1999 Through:30. h October, 2013 ......Petitioner Mr. K.K.Rohatagi, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Ravi Sakri, Mr. Vaibhav Kalra and Ms. Sumedha Dang, Advocates for R-2/AAI. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner who was appointed as Director (Administration) in the erstwhile National Airport Authority of India seeks a higher pay-scale from the first date of his appointment. A claim for higher pay-scale, for the period after National Airport Authority of India merging into Airport Authority of India, is also claimed by alleging arbitrariness in the circular dated 9.2.1998 by asserting equivalence of petitioner with an Executive Director.2. I put it to counsel for the petitioner that there can ordinarily be two basis to claim a higher pay-scale. First is that higher pa...
Rajinder Kumar Gupta Vs. Brig(Retd) S.S. Patwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :29. 07.2013 Judgment Pronounced on :30. 10.2013 + CS(OS) 2263/2010 RAJINDER KUMAR GUPTA Through ..... Plaintiff Ms.Neha Gupta, Advocate versus BRIG(RETD) S.S. PATWAL ..... Defendant Through Mr.Virendra Rawat, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present dispute relates to the post of President of Winter Games Federation of India (WGFI) which is stated to be a sports federation registered under the Societies Act 1860. The plaintiff was stated to be elected as the Secretary of the WGFI in 2002 and 2006. On 18.08.2010 elections took place for the post of office-bearers including, the post of President of WGFI. These elections were conducted at D.S.O.I. Club, New Delhi and were also attended by the representative of Indian Olympic Association (I.O.A.) as an Observer. The units which are affiliated to WGFI have voting rights and have a right to vote at every general assembly meeting. Each Sta...
Avinash Chand Gupta Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:21. 10.2013 Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 4963/2007 & CMs 9271/2007 &683/2010 SHIV PATTI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8785/2007 & CM Nos.2835/2009 & 6507/2009 R.C.GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 9148/2007 AVINASH CHAND GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8786/2007 & CM Nos.2833/2009,6506/2009 PARVEZ AHMED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR + ..... Respondent Thr...
R.C.Gupta and anr Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:21. 10.2013 Date of Decision:30. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 4963/2007 & CMs 9271/2007 &683/2010 SHIV PATTI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8785/2007 & CM Nos.2835/2009 & 6507/2009 R.C.GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 9148/2007 AVINASH CHAND GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh and Ms. Vaishali Ramesh, Advs. for R-2 W.P.(C) 8786/2007 & CM Nos.2833/2009,6506/2009 PARVEZ AHMED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advs. versus UOI & ANR + ..... Respondent Thr...
Surinder Kaur Vs. Ram Narula and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.651 of 2009 Reserved on: October 9, 2013 Decision on: October 30, 2013 SURINDER KAUR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate with Ms. Richa Kapoor and Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, Advocates. versus RAM NARULA & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pradeep Bakshi with Mr. Puneet Khurana, Advocates for Defendant No.41. Mr. Aviral Tiwari, Advocate for Defendants 1, 2, 18 and 29. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT3010.2013 IA Nos. 4741 of 2009, 974 of 2010, 2020 of 2013 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) & IA No.16878 of 2012 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC) 1. The background to these applications is that the Plaintiff, Mrs. Surinder Kaur, filed the aforementioned suit for declaration, partition of properties and rendition of accounts initially against 38 Defendants in relation to the properties of her mother Mrs. Jasbir Kaur.2. It is stated in the plaint that Mr. Ajit Singh Narula, deceased father of the Plaintiff and ...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Upender Kumar Mandal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. h October, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 181/2011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Mohan Babu Aggarwal, Advocate. Versus UPENDER KUMAR MANDAL & ORS. Represented by: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.4308/2011 (for delay) 1. Vide the instant application, the applicant/appellant company is seeking condonation of delay of 166 days in filing the instant appeal.2. It is stated in Para 9 of the instant application that appellant/ Insurance Company has filed the present appeal seeking the recovery rights.3. The accident occurred on 29.09.2007 in which respondent No.1 sustained injuries. He filed the claim petition on 17.12.2007 and the impugned award was passed by the learned Tribunal on 04.05.2010. It is admitted in MACA. No.181/2011 the instant application that the counsel the appellant/Insurance Company, who appeared before the learned Tribunal ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »