Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Smt Mukesh Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. t October, 2013 MAC.APP. 615/2011 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. Versus SMT MUKESH DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv. for R1 to R5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the award dated 22.03.2011, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.21,99,120/with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till the date of realization.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued the instant appeal on two grounds, firstly; deceased was not on a permanent job, which fact has been proved by the employer of the deceased. Despite that, ld. Tribunal has granted 30% towards future prospects, which is contrary to the dictum of Sarla Verma Vs. DTC and Ors. 2009 (6) SCC121 further affirmed by the judgment of Res...
Jasoka India Ltd. Vs. Official Liquidator, New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:21. 10.2013 WP(C) No.1982 of 2013 & CM No.12971 of 2013 JASOKA INDIA LTD. Through: ....Petitioner Mr. Subodh K. Pathak, Adv. Versus OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, NEW DELHI ....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Makhija, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner-Company made a reference to BIFR under Section 15 (1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the SICA) which declared the petitionerCompany sick vide order dated 22.6.1999. The State Bank of India (SBI) was appointed as the Operating Agency to examine the viability of the company and formulate a rehabilitation plan for its revival, in case it was found viable. Vide order dated 7.3.2006 the BIFR confirmed its prima facie opinion formed on 22.12.2003 to wind up the Company in terms of Section 20 (1) of the SICA. The BIFR also directed that the opinion formed by it be forwarded to the con...
Mr Rohit Sharma Vs. Mrs Sonia Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:21. 10.2013 + MAT.APP. (F.C.) 27/2013 CM APPL.12212, 12213 & 12214/2013 MR ROHIT SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhik Kumar, Advocate. Versus MRS SONIA SHARMA Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. This appeal is directed against an order of the Family Court dated 26.03.2013 whereby the learned Judge upon application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act fixed maintenance pendente lite in favour of the respondent wife @ `5,000/- per month.2. The undisputed facts are that the appellant married the respondent on 10.03.2008 in Delhi. The couple does not have any child. The appellant works with the NIIT Technologies Ltd. in Gurgaon and earns approximately `25,000/- per month. Claiming that she does not have any independent source of income, the respondent wife moved the Court under Section 24, after the husband ...
Vimi Verma Vs. Sanjay Verma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + O.M.P. 592/2013 VIMI VERMA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.P.S.Bindra & Ms.Shweta Priyadarshini, Advs. Versus SANJAY VERMA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Mohan Vidhani, Adv. with Mr.Arun Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is instituted by the Petitioner, Mrs. Vimi Verma, for the protection of her rights in the registered trademarks SIMPEX and SIMPEX-PRO used in connection with apparatus and instruments for use in photography in class 09 which are alleged to be infringed by the use of a deceptively similar mark SIMPLEX by the respondents.2. Relevant facts as per petition i) The Petitioner is the registered trademark owner of the marks SIMPEX and SIMPEX-PRO bearing application Nos. 544019 and 1290981 respectively, ha...
V P Aggarwal Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 01, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + (i) CRL.M.C.4165/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.14848/2013 GIRDHIR LAL MOHTA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi & Mr. Joy Basu, Senior Advocates with with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Mudit Jain & Ms. Megha Gupta, Advocates Versus CBI Through: + (ii) ....Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI CRL.M.C.4166/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.14850/2013 VIPUL AGGARWAL Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Mudit Jain & Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocates Versus CBI Through: + (iii) ....Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI CRL.M.C.4167/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.14852/2013 V P AGGARWAL Crl. M.C.Nos. 4165, 4166 & 4167 of 2013 Through: Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi & Mr. Joy Basu, Senior Advocates with with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Mudit Jain & Ms. Megha Gupta, Mr. Gurbaksh...
Transair and ors. Vs. M/S Kuwait Airways and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + OMP No.21/2013 TRANSAIR & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Ms. Garima Malhotra, Ms. Tushar Singh and Mr. Indresh Kumar and Ors. Versus M/S KUWAIT AIRWAYS AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mamta Tiwari, Ms. Veronica Mohan, Mr. Arpit Shukla and Mr. Pallav Mongia, Advs. for R-1, Mr. Abhijat Adv. with Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Mr. Harsh Hariharan & Mr. P. Kumar, Advs. for R-3 and R-4 AND O.M.P. No.24/2013 VANDANA GUPTA AND ANR Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Abhijat, Adv. with Mr.Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Mr. Harsh Hariharan & Mr.P.Kumar, Advs. Versus KUWAIT AIRWAYS LTD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Mamta Tiwari, Ms.Veronica Mohan, Mr.Arpit Shukla and Mr.Pallav Mongia, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vaibhav Gaggar, Ms.Garima Malhot...
Paramjeet Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1770/2013 Date of Decision:21. t October, 2013 PARAMJEET Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Tanveer Ahmad Mir, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Asha Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Ashok Kumar, Crime Branch. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the petitioner for grant of bail in case FIR No.152/2013, under Section 419/420/467/468/471/120-B IPC PS Crime Branch.2. As per the allegations in the FIR, secret information was received in SOS office that Pradeep and Devender were recruiting drivers and conductors on the basis of fake conductors licence-cum-badge and fake driving licence after charging huge amount. On this information, a raid was conducted. Decoy customers were deputed for being recruited as drivers and conductors. A trap was laid. Pradeep and Devender demanded Rs. 70...
Raje Lal Permeshwari Dass Vs. Shashi Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.268/2013 & C.M. No.11447/2013 RAJE LAL PERMESHWARI DASS Through Mr.R.K.Singh, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus SHASHI SHARMA Through ..... Respondent Mrs.Inderjeet Saroop, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of filing the present petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short, called the DRC Act), the petitioner Raje Lal Permeshwari Dass assails the order dated 22nd January, 2013 passed by the learned Addl. Rent Controller (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi, whereby the application filed by the petitioner (respondent in the eviction petition) for leave to defend was dismissed.2. Brief facts stated in the eviction petition as per the respondent (petitioner before the learned trial Court): (a) The respondent is the landlord/owner of the premises room/shop No.6, Ground Floor, G-48, Green Park, New Delhi-110016, measuring 9.5 x 4....
Professor L.S. Tanwar Vs. Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6420/ 2010 21st October, 2013 % PROFESSOR L.S. TANWAR Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate. Versus NETAJI SUBHAS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Amiet Andley, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner seeks the benefit of increase in his age of superannuation from 62 years to 65 years in terms of the notification dated 5.3.2010 of the respondent no.3/All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE).2. That the notification dated 5.3.2010 has been approved for implementation by the respondent no.2/Govt. of NCT of Delhi as regards the respondent no.1 is not disputed, and which is in terms of the office order dated 29.7.2010 of the respondent no.2. This order also does not give any prospective date for implementat...
K.K.Verma and ors. Vs. University of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.3147/ 2007 & Conn. 21st October, 2013 % 1. W.P.(C) 3147/2007 K.K.VERMA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Rashmi Singla, Advocate. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS Through:2. ..... Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for University of Delhi. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for UGC. W.P.(C) 3657/2007 SH. J.P.PANDEY & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Rashmi Singla, Advocate. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through:3. ..... Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for University of Delhi. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for UGC. W.P.(C) 3583/2007 SH. JAGDISH PARSAD & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Rashmi Singla, Advocate. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS Through:4. ..... Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for University of Delhi. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for UGC. Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Advocate for respondent No.4. W.P.(C) 3984/2007 SH. BALDEV & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Rashmi Singla, Advocate. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »