Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramesh Kumar and anr Vs. Mandeep Singh and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + O.M.P. No.294/2010 RAMESH KUMAR & ANR Through ..... Petitioners Mr.Jayant Nath, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Subhash Mishra, Adv. versus MANDEEP SINGH & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr.Jagjit Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioners have filed the present objections/appeal under Section 34 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for setting aside the award dated 15th April, 2010 published by the sole arbitrator on the grounds mainly that it is violative of law and against public policy.2. The petitioner No.1 is a resident of Patna. He had 50% of the paid up capital of Maty Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The petitioner 2 is a company registered under the Companies Act, having its registered office at New Delhi. Respondents No.1 and 2 were the shareholders of the petitioner No.2 company and together had 50% of the total issue sha...
Pushpinder Singh Nanda Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 25, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + WP(C) No.4973/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate with Mr.Vikram Aditya Naryan, Advocate versus PRABHU NATH PRASAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate WP(C) No.4974/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate with Mr.Vikram Aditya Naryan, Advocate versus N.JAYMMA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. A common order dated January 30, 2013, allowing OA No.4611/2011, filed by the respondents in W.P.(C) No.4974/2013 and OA No.4612/2011 filed by the respondents in W.P.(C) No.4973/2013 is challenged in the two captioned writ petitions.2. The respondents in the two writ petitions who were the claimants before t...
Commissioner of Police and ors. Vs. Brahm Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 30, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: October 21, 2013 + WP (C) 3682/2013 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate with Ms.Bandana Shukla, Advocate versus BRAHM PRAKASH Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The present writ petition challenges the order dated November 20, 2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No.1928/2011 wherein the Tribunal has quashed the findings of the Inquiry Officer, the penalty order dated March 18, 2010 imposing a penalty of forfeiture of five years approved service upon the respondent as well as the order dated May 25, 2010 rejecting the appeal filed by the respondent against the order dated March 18, 2010 passed by the disciplinary authority.2. The respondent was enrolled as a Constable with the D...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Prabhu Nath Prasad and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 25, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + WP(C) No.4973/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate with Mr.Vikram Aditya Naryan, Advocate versus PRABHU NATH PRASAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate WP(C) No.4974/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate with Mr.Vikram Aditya Naryan, Advocate versus N.JAYMMA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. A common order dated January 30, 2013, allowing OA No.4611/2011, filed by the respondents in W.P.(C) No.4974/2013 and OA No.4612/2011 filed by the respondents in W.P.(C) No.4973/2013 is challenged in the two captioned writ petitions.2. The respondents in the two writ petitions who were the claimants before t...
Anil Soni Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 26, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2983/2013 ANIL SONI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.T.S.Doabla, Sr.Adv.with Ms.Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Amrit Pal Singh, Ms.Shruti Aggarwal and Mr.Kartikey Mahajan, Advocates W.P.(C) 4797/2013 PUSHPINDER SINGH NANDA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Yashvardhan, Adv. and Mr.Akshay Sapra, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Amrit Pal Singh, Ms.Shruti Aggarwal and Mr.Kartikey Mahajan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Interpretation of sub-Section 2 of Section 77 of The Electricity Act, 2003, falls for consideration in the two captioned petitions. Two additional issues, the first pertainin...
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Harish Chand Gupta and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on October 09, 2013 Judgment Delivered on October 21, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5199/2010 A.K.GOYAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Kittu Bajaj, Advocate versus HARISH CHAND GUPTA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.G.D.Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Anil Mittal and Mr.Anuj Kr.Ranjan, Advocates for R-1 Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. for R-2 + W.P.(C) 7919/2010 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus HARISH CHAND GUPTA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.G.D.Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Anil Mittal and Mr.Anuj Kr.Ranjan, Advocates for R-1 Ms.Kittu Bajaj, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. Since the two writ petitions arise out of a common order dated May 12, 2010 in Transfer Application No.728/2009, involving identical facts and issue, with the consent of counsel for the parties are ...
Emaar Mgf Land Limited Vs. Kakade British Realities Private Limited an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:08. 10.2013 Judgment delivered on:21.10.2013 + ARB. A. 18/2013 and IA Nos.15911/2013 (stay) and IA No.15912/2013 (directions) EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED ..... Petitioner Versus KAKADE BRITISH REALITIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manmeet Arora, Mr. Harsh, Mr. Kapil Rustagi and Ms. Nidhi, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Virender Goswami, Ms. Soni Singh and Mr. Abhinay, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 This is an appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) against the order dated 06.09.2013, passed by the learned sole arbitrator, on an application, preferred under Section 9 of the Act by the appellant herein. 1.1 The appellant had filed a petition under Section 9 of the Act, whereupon this court vide order dated 25.02.2013,...
Sanjay Verma Vs. Sadhana Agrawal and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 09.10.2013 Judgment delivered on:21. 10.2013 CS(OS) 1092/2010 SANJAY VERMA ..... Plaintiff Through: Sermon Rawat, Advocate versus SADHANA AGRAWAL & ANR ..... Defendant Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit to seek recovery of the amount of Rs. 23,70,000/- from the two defendants jointly and severally, along with interest from the date of institution of the suit till realization @ 5% per month in terms of the agreement between the parties. The plaintiff also seeks a decree of permanent injunction restraining defendant No.1 from creating any third party interest in the share of 7% in land (with built in structure) bearing Khasra No.657 situated at village Ghookna, Pragana Loni, Tehsil & District Ghaziabad (U.P.) and to seek a restraint against alienation of the said property in any manner.2. The case of the plaintiff is that the husband of def...
Ashok Kumar Vs. Shashi Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.141/2013 & C.M. No.6030/2013 ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.S.C.Singhal, Adv. versus SHASHI SHARMA ..... Respondent Through Mrs.Inderjeet Saroop, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of filing the present petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short, called the DRC Act), the petitioner assails the order dated 22nd January, 2013 passed by the learned Addl. Rent Controller (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for leave to defend was dismissed.2. Brief facts stated in the eviction petition as per the respondent are : (a) The respondent is the landlord/owner of the premises kiosk/shop No.5, Ground Floor, G-48, Green Park, New Delhi-110016, measuring 8.3 x 3.3ft. as shown in red colour in the site plan (hereinafter referred to as the Tenanted Premises). The tenanted premi...
Girdhir Lal Mohta Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 01, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + (i) CRL.M.C.4165/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.14848/2013 GIRDHIR LAL MOHTA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi & Mr. Joy Basu, Senior Advocates with with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Mudit Jain & Ms. Megha Gupta, Advocates Versus CBI Through: + (ii) ....Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI CRL.M.C.4166/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.14850/2013 VIPUL AGGARWAL Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Mudit Jain & Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocates Versus CBI Through: + (iii) ....Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI CRL.M.C.4167/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.14852/2013 V P AGGARWAL Crl. M.C.Nos. 4165, 4166 & 4167 of 2013 Through: Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi & Mr. Joy Basu, Senior Advocates with with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Mudit Jain & Ms. Megha Gupta, Mr. Gurbaksh...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »