Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaswinder Singh Vs. Surinder Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.162/2012 & C.M. Nos.6798/2012, 6799/2012 & 14587/2013 JASWINDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anand Mishra, Adv. versus SURINDER KAUR Through ..... Respondent Mr.K.C. Maini, Adv. with Mr.Amardeep Maini, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present revision petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with section 151 CPC against the eviction order dated 29th October 2011 passed against the petitioner by the learned Additional Rent Controller, in respect of premises bearing house No.5/114, Gali No.5, Nirankari Colony, Delhi 110009 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted premises.2. The main grounds taken in the present revision petition filed by the petitioner are that the respondent or her family members have no intention to return to Delhi as they are already settl...
S.D. Technical Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Rail Coach Factory (Kapurthala)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 10.2013 ARB.P. 436/2012 S.D TECHNICAL SERVICES (P) LTD ..... Petitioner versus RAIL COACH FACTORY(KAPURTHALA) ..... Respondent ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. V.N. Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Jagjit Singh and Mr. Tarak Khanna, Advocates CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator. Notice in this petition was issued on 16.11.2012. Since then respondent has entered appearance and filed its reply. The reply is short, it takes two objections. The first objection is with regard to the territorial jurisdiction of this court. The Second objection is with regard to its power to appoint an arbitrator in terms of clause 2900 (c) of the IRS. 1.1 It is not disputed by Mr. Singh, the learned counsel for the respondent that the appointm...
Arya Samaj Vs. Shakuntala Bakshi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.373/2011 ARYA SAMAJ Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Dhruv Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Milandeep Singh, Adv. versus SHAKUNTALA BAKSHI Through ..... Respondent Mr.Ratan K.Singh, Adv. with Mr.Suraj Prakash, Mr.Saurav Suman & Ms.Sonakshi Banga, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner (respondent in the eviction petition) has filed the abovementioned Civil Revision Petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short, called the DRC Act) against the order dated 7th April, 2011 passed by the learned Addl. Rent Controller (South), Delhi in Eviction Petition bearing No.E-15/10 whereby the eviction order was passed against the petitioner by dismissing the application for leave to defend in favour of the respondent, directing the petitioner to vacate the half portion of big hall on the ground floor (North-East Side) in the property bearing No.18/...
Vandana Gupta and anr. Vs. Kuwait Airways Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + OMP No.21/2013 TRANSAIR & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Ms. Garima Malhotra, Ms. Tushar Singh and Mr. Indresh Kumar and Ors. Versus M/S KUWAIT AIRWAYS AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mamta Tiwari, Ms. Veronica Mohan, Mr. Arpit Shukla and Mr. Pallav Mongia, Advs. for R-1, Mr. Abhijat Adv. with Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Mr. Harsh Hariharan & Mr. P. Kumar, Advs. for R-3 and R-4 AND O.M.P. No.24/2013 VANDANA GUPTA AND ANR Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Abhijat, Adv. with Mr.Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Mr. Harsh Hariharan & Mr.P.Kumar, Advs. Versus KUWAIT AIRWAYS LTD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Mamta Tiwari, Ms.Veronica Mohan, Mr.Arpit Shukla and Mr.Pallav Mongia, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vaibhav Gaggar, Ms.Garima Malhot...
Abhilash Singh Vs. C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : September 26, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : October 21, 2013 + CRL.A. 539/2005 ABHILASH SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.M.L. Yadav, Advocate versus C.B.I. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.R.V. Sinha and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.1. The case of the prosecution in brief is that during the house search of Baldev Raj in Case No.RC63A)/96-DLI dated 24.7.96, reliable information was received that Abhilash Singh (Accused), Mate, working in Enforcement Branch of DDA, had worked under Shri Baldev Raj and was having some incriminating documents of the case. On house search U/s 165 Cr.P.C. of the house of accused conducted on 25.7.96 it was revealed that during the period from May 1996 to July 1996 accused had kept Rs.1.80 lakhs with his friend Shri Vijay Kumar, Junior Engineer. Thereafter on the complaint of Shri H.C.Bist, DSP, CBI, ACB, New Delhi the instant case was registered ...
Union of India and ors. Vs. N.Jaymma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 25, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + WP(C) No.4973/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate with Mr.Vikram Aditya Naryan, Advocate versus PRABHU NATH PRASAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate WP(C) No.4974/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate with Mr.Vikram Aditya Naryan, Advocate versus N.JAYMMA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. A common order dated January 30, 2013, allowing OA No.4611/2011, filed by the respondents in W.P.(C) No.4974/2013 and OA No.4612/2011 filed by the respondents in W.P.(C) No.4973/2013 is challenged in the two captioned writ petitions.2. The respondents in the two writ petitions who were the claimants before t...
Ks Sethi Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:21. October, 2013 + W.P.(C) No.8072/2010 KS SETHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek K. Singh, Mr. Sunklan Porwal, and Mr. Arav Kapoor, Advocates. Versus PUNJAB & SIND BANK Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr. Jagat Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present petition is preferred against the impugned order dated 12.08.2008 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, order dated 06.04.2009 passed by the Appellate Authority and order dated 14.09.2010 passed by the Reviewing Authority, whereby the petitioner has been removed from service under Regulation 4(1) of the Punjab & Sind Bank Officer Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1981 as amended upto date.2. Vide this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the aforenoted orders dated 12.08.2008, 06.04.2009 and 14.09.2010 with consequential benefits. Also seeking a direction to d...
Union of India Vs. Nisha Priya Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve :13. 12.2012 Date of Decision :21. 10.2013 + W.P. (C) 3704/2012 & CM APPL.Nos. 7772, 7774, 8894, 9629 & 10289/2012 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Walia with Ms. Varsha Juneja and Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocates. Versus NISHA PRIYA BHATIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Nisha Priya Bhatia, respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. In this writ petition, the Union Government feels aggrieved by an order of the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter called the CAT) in O.A. No.3613/2011. The CAT allowed the respondent/petitioners (hereafter called the respondent or Ms. Bhatia) application and directed the regularization of two spells of alleged unauthorized absence and also directed the Union Government to revise the respondents pension with effect from 19.12.2009 with consequential WP(C) No.3704/12 & CM No...
Nitish Sharma and ors. Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:21. 10.2013 + WP(C) No.5273 of 2013 NITISH SHARMA & ORS. Through: ....Petitioners In person. Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar & Mr. Vipin Singh, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Anubha Agrawal, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Amitesh Mumar, Ms. Mamta Tiwari & Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Yashpal, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) CM No.11816/2013 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. WP (C) No.5273/2013 Respondent No.4-Global Educational & Social Trust, situated in Faridabad, Haryana applied to respondent No.1-Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (for short GGSIPU) seeking affiliation to the said University for its MBA Course for the academic year 2011-2012. In terms of the requirement of Statute 24 of its Statutes, GGSIPU required respondent No.4 to obtain a No Objection from the State of Haryana before its application...
Anu Sharma and ors. Vs. Vinod Prakash Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order pronounced on: October 21, 2013 CM(M) No.826/2013 & C.M. No.12875/2013 (for stay) ANU SHARMA & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Dr.R.S.Sasan, Adv. versus VINOD PRAKASH SHARMA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms.Meena Chaudhury, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek to challenge the impugned order dated 6th July 2013 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Saket, New Delhi in probate case No.75/11 whereby the said probate case had been consolidated with Civil Suit No.207/11.2. The facts leading to the present petition are that the petitioners filed a probate suit for grant of a probate of a will executed by their grandmother Late Smt.Bhagwati Devi Sharma which was duly executed on 29 th November 2000. The petitioners also filed a civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction wherein the petitioner sought relief inter-alia to declare the unregistere...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »