Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudhir Damodaran Vs. Anastatius Cheryl Damodaran
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:22. 10.2013 + MAT.APP. (F.C.) 11/2013 CM APPL.9707/2013 SUDHIR DAMODARAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Gurmeet Bindra, Advocate. versus ANASTATIUS CHERYL DAMODARAN ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Malvika Rajkotia with Mr.Vaibhav Vats, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. In this appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act preferred by the husband, an order made under Section 36 of the Special Marriage Act directing the award of `1 lakhs per month as maintenance to the respondent wife has been challenged.2. The facts of the case are that the parties to the dispute solemnized their marriage under the Special Marriage Act on 10.07.1985 at Mumbai. They have two daughters. The wife claimed that the husband was indulging in adulterous relationship resulting in his moving out of the matrimonial house. It is an admitted fact that the husban...
Aziz Ahmed @ Ajit Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
$~R-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.62/2005 Judgment dated 21st October, 2013 % AZIZ AHMED @ AJIT ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Haneef Mohammad, Ms.Harpreet Kaur and Mr.Imran Ahmed, Advocates versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Ahmed Ghazi, Adv for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant in this case has been convicted under Section 304B and 498-A of the IPC. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25.11.2004 and the order on sentence dated 29.11.2004 by which the appellant has been convicted to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years under section 304-B and rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.2500/- and in default thereof to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month under section 498-A IPC.2. On the statement of the father of the deceased, Sh.Sriniwas, made on 4.3.2002 before the SDM, the present case was registered. It was stated by Sh.Srinivas that h...
State Vs. Virender Yadav and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 356/2012 STATE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Manvi Priya, Advocate versus VIRENDER YADAV & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR ORDER2210.2013 % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. Present criminal leave petition has been preferred by the State challenging the judgment dated 22nd October 2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track, New Delhi, thereby acquitting the accused persons for the offence punishable under Section 21 of NDPS Act. Notice of this criminal leave petition was directed by this court vide orders dated 24th September 2011, pursuant thereof, respondent No.2 had appeared alongwith his counsel. But so far as respondent No.1 is concerned, he remained unserved. Non-bailable warrants were directed by this court against respondent No.1 vide ...
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Harish Chand Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on October 09, 2013 Judgment Delivered on October 21, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4728/2011 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus HARISH CHAND GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.G.D.Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Anil Mittal and Mr.Anuj Kr.Ranjan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal dated December 20, 2010, whereby the Tribunal has allowed the Transfer Application No.1300/2009 thereby directing the petitioner to make payment of arrears to the respondent pursuant to his promotion as Deputy Traffic Manager [re-designated as Senior Manager (Traffic)]..2. The brief facts are that the respondent was appointed as Assistant Traffic Superintendent on September 30, 1982. He was promoted to the post of Traffic Super...
Shimal Investment and Trading Co. Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2013 Date of Decision:21. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 3125/2001 SHIMAL INVESTMENT AND TRADING CO. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K. Datta, Mr. Ashish Verma and Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC with Ms. Niti Arora, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.Vide notification dated 3.9.1996, issued in exercise of the powers conferred by the Drugs (Prices Control Order, 1995), the Central Government, inter alia, fixed the price of Nalidixic Acid + Metronidazole Tab having strength of Nalidixic Acid 300 MG and Metronidazole 200 MG, at Rs.12.70 for a pack of six tablets. Vide order dated 27.01.1998, issued under the aforesaid order, the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority) notified that the manufacturers of all the Scheduled formulation, in pack sizes different from the notified pack size under sub-para...
Samir Jasuja Vs. M/S Assotech Realty Private Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:03. 10.2013 % + Order delivered on:21. 10.2013 CS(OS) 2229/2009 SAMIR JASUJA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Wasim Ashraf, Advocates versus M/S ASSOTECH REALTY PRIVATE LTD & ORS...... Defendants Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate for defendant No.1. Mr. Navin Chawla, Mr. Pranav Sarthi & Mr. Manik Godra, Advocates for defendant No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI ORDER VIPIN SANGHI, J.I.A. No.16461/2011 (by defendant No.1 to seek leave to defend) I.A. No.8458/2012 (by defendant No.2 to seek leave to defend) 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit under the summary procedure contained in Order 37 CPC. The case of the plaintiff is that he had joined defendant No.1-M/s Assotech Realty Private Limited, in the position of Marketing Advisor vide letter dated 23.09.2005. The monthly remuneration agreed as payable to the plaintiff was Rs.1,25,000/- per month (all inclusive), plus service tax plus 0.1...
Vipul Aggarwal Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 01, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 21, 2013 + (i) CRL.M.C.4165/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.14848/2013 GIRDHIR LAL MOHTA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi & Mr. Joy Basu, Senior Advocates with with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Mudit Jain & Ms. Megha Gupta, Advocates Versus CBI Through: + (ii) ....Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI CRL.M.C.4166/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.14850/2013 VIPUL AGGARWAL Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Mudit Jain & Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocates Versus CBI Through: + (iii) ....Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI CRL.M.C.4167/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.14852/2013 V P AGGARWAL Crl. M.C.Nos. 4165, 4166 & 4167 of 2013 Through: Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi & Mr. Joy Basu, Senior Advocates with with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Mudit Jain & Ms. Megha Gupta, Mr. Gurbaksh...
M/S Park Side Limited Vs. M/S Blues Luxury Impex Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + IA No.8109/2011 in CS(OS) 437/2011 Reserved on:26. h September, 2013 Decided on:21. h October, 2013 % M/S PARK SIDE LIMITED Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Mr. Anil Kumar Chandel and Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Advocates. versus M/S BLUES LUXURY IMPEX PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sidharth Dutta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA IA No.8109/2011 (u/Order XXXVII Rule 3 CPC by Defendant) 1. By this application under Order XXXVII Rule 3 CPC the Defendant seeks leave to defend.2. Learned counsel for the Defendant contends that a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC can be based only on a written contract and all invoices cannot be deemed to be a written contract. Invoices relied upon by the Plaintiff do not have the necessary terms of agreement. The invoice only gives number of articles and the value thereof. Neither the brand name nor the quality of the goods is mentioned. Further particulars of sellers, terms of su...
Surinder Singh Vs. Gurmeet Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: October 21, 2013 RC. Rev. No.224/2011 & C.M. Nos.20144/2011, 12835/2012 & CM No.11222/2011 SURINDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.S.K. Badhwar, Adv. versus GURMEET KAUR ..... Respondent Through Ms.Prerna Mehta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the above mentioned civil revision under Section 25(B)(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 challenging the order dated 5th February, 2011 passed by the ARC/ACJ/West Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, by which the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioner/tenant was dismissed.2. Notice of the present petition was issued on 12th July, 2011 and in the interim the execution of the eviction order was stayed. It appears that the respondent filed two applications, being CM No.20144/2011 for fixing rent at the current market value and being CM No.12835/2012 under Section 151 CPC for vacation of the ex-parte stay order ...
Anuj Kumar Verma Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5448/2012 21st October,2013 % ANUJ KUMAR VERMA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. M.L.Chawla and Mr. G.D.Chawla, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Rohit Jaind, Adv. for R-2 to 5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner Mr. Anuj Kumar Verma seeks basically three reliefs. The first relief is for regularization of services with the respondent-employer, represented by respondent nos. 2 to 4, namely Central Electronics Limited. The second relief which is claimed is for continuation of services without regularization of service from 1.6.2012. The third relief which is claimed is for releasing the claims of the petitioner towards TA/DA bills raised upon the employer during the period of contractual service.2. The admitted fact is that petitioner...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »