Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manoj Yadav Vs. Tapan Kumar Deka and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Mansi Jai Surya Harvey and ors Vs. Arnold Harvey and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1973/2011 Reserved on:8. h October, 2013 Decided on:22. d October, 2013 % MANSI JAI SURYA HARVEY & ORS Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Jagjit Singh, Mr. Rahul Chopra, Advs. versus ARNOLD HARVEY & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Rikky Gupta, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA IA179472011 (by defendants u/O VII R11CPC) 1. By this application the major objection of the defendants is that since no cause of action arises at this stage, the present suit is liable to be rejected.2. Learned counsel for the defendants contends that the plaintiffs who are the minor daughters of the defendant No.1 are claiming their share in the property of defendant No.1, inherited by him from his father. Since the defendant No.1 is alive and is the absolute owner of the property, the plaintiffs in the life time of the defendant No.1 cannot seek partition of the property and recovery of the share. Consequently, the suit is liable to be dismissed on this co...
Manoj Yadava and ors. Vs. Prabodh Kumar Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Union of India and ors. Vs. Rajiv Tandon and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Rameshwar Singh Yadav Vs. Raunak Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: October 22, 2013 + C.M.(M) No.1062/2012 & CM No.16692/2012 RAMESHWAR SINGH YADAV ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.R.K. Saini, Adv. versus RAUNAK SINGH AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. H.L. Narula, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 3rd July, 2012 passed by Sh. Harun Pratap, Addl. District Judge, Civil Judge-7, North/Delhi in suit No.447 of 2012 whereby the petitioners application under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC was dismissed.2. The brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present matter are that the respondent No.1/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of possession and damages for use and occupation on 22nd June, 2008 which is pending adjudication in the Court of ADJ, Civil Judge-7, North Delhi. The suit pr...
Upsc Vs. O.P. Mehra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:22. 10.2013 + WP(C) No.6615 of 2011 UPSC Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Aditi Gupta & Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Advs. versus O.P. MEHRA ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The respondent before this Court applied to the CPIO of the petitioner-Union Public Service Commission (for short UPSC) seeking information on as many as 40 points. The information, however, was declined by the CPIO on various grounds as contained in the reply dated 31.8.2010. Being aggrieved from such refusal the respondent preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority. The appeal having been rejected the respondent preferred a second appeal before the Central Information Commission (for short Commission). Vide impunged order dated 25.7.2011, the Commission directed the PIO to provide information in relation to query Nos.1.36 & 1.38. The aforesaid queries read as under:1....
L.T. Overseas North America Inc. Vs. Sachdeva and Sons Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S (OS) Nos. 342/2003, IAs 10028/2007, 7630/2008, OA652013 Date of Decision:22.10.2013 L.T. OVERSEAS NORTH AMERICA INC. Through: ......Plaintiff Mr. J.Saideepak, Ms Julien George, Advs for the appellant in OA No.65/2013 Versus SACHDEVA & SONS PVT. LTD Through: ......Defendant Mr. Manish Vashisht, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.O.A. No.65/2013 (filed by the plaintiff against the order of the Joint Registrar dated 22.04.2013) 1. The instant appeal is filed by the plaintiff/appellant against the Order dated April 22, 2013, passed by the Ld. Joint Registrar dismissing the application filed by it under Order VII Rule 14 of the CPC (I.A. No.6336/2013), seeking leave to place on record additional documents.2. The plaintiff/appellant has sought to place on record, Apostilled Registration Certificates issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in favour of the appellant/plaintiffs mark ROYAL, as well as cert...
Nirmal Gupta and ors Vs. M/S Ganton India Pvt Ltd and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A. No.4335/2013 (O.XII R.6 CPC) in CS(OS) 3131/2012 Reserved on:3. d October, 2013 Decided on:22. d October, 2013 % NIRMAL GUPTA & ORS Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. R.S. Chauhan and Mr. D.K. Thakur, Advocates. versus M/S GANTON INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Gaurav Chandhok and Ms. Samreen, Advocates for Defendant No.2. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By this application the plaintiff seeks a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant in terms of the admissions made by the defendant.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs contends that the defendants have clearly admitted the relationship of a landlord and tenant qua the suit property. The defendants have further admitted the rate of rent and lease agreement dated 15th February, 2010 vide which suit property was leased out ON a monthly rent of Rs. 3 lakhs to M/s. GT Telecom Pvt. Ltd. The defendants have admitted that defendant No.2...
Upsc Vs. Tarsem Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:22. 10.2013 + WP(C) No.4661 of 2011 UPSC Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Aditi Gupta & Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Advs. versus TARSEM LAL ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The respondent before this Court applied to the CPIO of the petitioner-Union Public Service Commission (for short UPSC) seeking the following information:(i) Please provide a copy of the minutes of the Commissions meeting held on 24 June, 2010. (ii) Under what circumstances Shri Biresh Kumar, Additional Secretary presented/presided over the meeting when he is complainant in some cases viz. Shri Tarsem Lal, Deputy Secretary. (iii) What safeguards were adopted to ensure Shri Biresh Kumar, IAS does not influence the proceedings of the Commission. (iv) Please provide copies of the notings of the Commissions relevant file pertaining to the processing of the disciplinary case of Shri Tarse...
Manoja Yadav Vs. Praveen Kumar Sinha and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »