Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
indraj Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8756/2011 Date of Decision:23. d October, 2013 % INDRAJ SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Arun Srivastava, Adv. versus UOI AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner in this case has prayed for a direction of this court to conduct a Court of Inquiry qua examining and giving opinion as to whether the condition of the petitioner is attributable or aggravated by his service conditions. It appears that while deployed at Tripura between 26th January, 2001 to 11th February, 2001, the petitioner was treated in the Battalion Headquarters at Nalkata as a suspected case of PF Malaria. Upon discharge on 11 th February, 2001, he was advised line rest for two days. The petitioner has submitted before us that his condition did not improve and on 20 th February, 2001 he had applied for 60 days earned leave for self tre...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Sh. Vinod Kumar Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. 04.2013 Pronounced on:22. 10.2013 + CONT. CAS. (CRL.) 8/2011 IN THE MATTER OF COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION IN RE.: SH. VINOD KUMAR JAIN ......Contemnor Through : Sh. G.L. Rawal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Alok Aggarwal and Sh. Praveen Kapur, Advocates, for Contemnor. Sh. Pallav Saxena, Advocate, for Punjab and Sind Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. These contempt proceedings arise from an order of this Court dated 02.02.2011 passed in Co.Pet. 115/1991 in the matter of Elephanta Oil & Vanaspati Industries Ltd., by which this Court took suo moto cognizance of the certain accusations made against Mr. Vinod Kumar Jain (hereinafter the contemnor).2. Before addressing the charge of contempt, a background of the facts that led to the accusation and the charge is important. Mr. Jain CONT. CAS. (CRL.) 8/2011 Page 1 was the Director of Elephanta Oil & Vanasp...
Manoj Yadav and ors. Vs. Prabodh Kumar Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Manoj Yadava Vs. Nkm Mishra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Charu Nagwani Vs. Lakhmi Chand Nagwani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :10. 10.2013 Pronounced on:22. 10.2013 + FAO No.151/2013 & CM Nos. 5566/2013 & 11210/2013 Appellant CHARU NAGWANI Through: Sh. Shiv Charan Garg with Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Shashank Mittal, Advocates. Versus LAKHMI CHAND NAGWANI ...Respondent Through: Dr. M.K. Gahlaut, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This is a wifes appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, directed against a judgment and order decreeing dissolution of her marriage with the respondent (hereafter called the husband). This Court had the benefit of considering the Trial court records.2. The brief facts of the case are that the parties to the proceedings got married on 01.09.2008. It was a second marriage for both of them; the wife had a son - a minor child at the time of the second marriage (named Gautam) and the husband had two daughters, both living with their mother FAO No...
Manoj Yadava and ors. Vs. Y.Anil Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Manoj Yadav and ors. Vs. Surender Kumar Pandey and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Smt. Kamla Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.6618/2013 22nd October, 2013 SMT. KAMLA Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Geeta Sharma and Ms. Venessa Singh, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Ms. Sweety Manchanda, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Piyush Gaur and Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner seeks compassionate employment on account of death of her husband who died in harness on 19.7.2012.2. It is now settled law that compassionate employment is not a source of recruitment. Compassionate appointment can only be in terms of an applicable policy. The following important observations have been made by the Supreme Court recently in the case of State Bank of India and Anr. Vs. Raj Kumar 2010 (3) Scale 635 with respect to compassionate employment.6. It is now well settled that appointment on compassionate grounds is n...
Advance Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs. Spack Turnkey Projects P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23rd September, 2013 Date of Decision:22. d October, 2013 % + Co.Appls.1565-66/2013 in CO.PET. 36/2003 ADVANCE STEEL TUBES LTD. Through None ..... Petitioner versus SPACK TURNKEY PROJECTS P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar with Mr.R. Salecha, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Manish K. Bishnoi, Adv. for official liquidator CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.: These applications have come to be filed in the following circumstances. In the main company petition filed by Advance Steel Tubes Ltd. seeking winding up of Spack Turn Key Projects Pvt. Ltd., the applicant herein, this Court appointed a provisional liquidator by order dated 15.1.2005. Thereafter, CA1713of 2009 was moved by the provisional liquidator praying for issue of directions to the State Bank of Indore, to stop the sale of property bearing No.916, Sector 15, Faridabad. It would appear that this property was mortgaged by the company in liquidation with t...
Rajender Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.324/2013 % Date of decision:22. d May, 2013 RAJENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Major K. Ramesh, Adv. with Ms. Archana Ramesh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Adv. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (ORAL) 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 6th November, 2010 passed by the Deputy Commandant, CISF finding the petitioner guilty of the following charge:No.034470754 Constable (GD) Rajender Singh of SSG, CISF, Greater Noida (U.P.) while deployed at Shri Madhavan Nair outpost Bangalore was detailed for C shift duty from 2100 hrs on 15.9.2010 to 0500 hrs on 16.9.2010 with Arms at the residence of the PP. The said Constable was found sitting on a chair and sleeping on duty at 2358 hrs. on 15.9.2010 when checked by Shri Devender Kumar Insp/exe. The post I/C. This act of CISF No.034470754 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »