Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manish Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :23. d October, 2013 DECIDED ON :31. t October, 2013 + CRL.A.189/2004 MANISH + CRL.A.139/2004 RAM SARUP + ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Rakesh Kumar with Mr.Deb Nandan, Advocates. ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Rakesh Kumar with Mr.Deb Nandan, Advocates. CRL.A.169/2004 MANOJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.S.S.Dahiya with Mr.L.K.Dahiya, Advocates. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Manish (A-1), Ram Sarup (A-2), Manoj (A-3) and Pintu @ Parvinder were arrested in case FIR No.19/2001 registered at Police Station Subzimandi and sent for trial for committing offences punishable under Sections 120-B/392/394/397 IPC. The prosecution case in the charge-sheet was that on 18.01.2001 Raghubir Singh and Ravinder had gone to deposit cash of their employer Om Prakash doing business in the name and style of M/s Kanshi Ram Pawan Kumar, at 181-182, Azad Market, Delhi in Oriental Ban...
Smt. Neelam Chopra Vs. M/S. Allied Fruits and Florists Pvt. Ltd. and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. 10.2013 Pronounced on:31. 10.2013 + LPA4232010, C.M. No.11244/2010 (for stay) & 20999/2012 (for recall of order) SMT. NEELAM CHOPRA ..Appellant Versus M/S. ALLIED FRUITS & FLORISTS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ..... Respondents + LPA2072011, C.M. NO.4547/2011 (for stay) SMT. NEELAM CHOPRA ..... Appellant Versus M/S. ALLIED FRUITS & FLORISTS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate (17 and 18), for appellant. Ms. Ravneet Kaur and Ms. Kavika Agnihotri, Advocates, for NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. These appeals impugn two separate orders of the learned Single LPA423/2010 & 207/2011 Page 1 Judge, disposing off W.P.(C) 10557/2009 (order dated 31.05.2010, impugned in LPA4232010) and W.P.(C) 403/2008 (order dated 10.01.2011, impugned in LPA2072011). In LPA2072011, the respondent had sought for a direction to the New Delhi Munic...
Sh. Ajit Singh and anr. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:01. 10.2013 Pronounced on:31. 10.2013 + LPA226667/2005, C.M. No.14853/2005 (for stay) SH. AJIT SINGH AND ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Sh. D.K. Rustagi and Sh. Pankaj Gupta, Advocates. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Rajiv Bansal and Ms. Deepti Gautam, Advocates, for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge, dismissing writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution - W.P.(C) 10499 and 10500/2004, initiated by the appellants, against the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) seeking certain directions.2. The appellants were aggrieved by a decision of DDA to carve out small plots on the land designated as institutional housing, proposing it for allotment to slum dwellers sought to be settled as a consequence of relocation. Land compri...
Waljis Travels (i) Pvt Ltd Vs. Govt. (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:31. 10.2013 WP(C) No.982 of 2013; CM Nos.1873 of 2013 & 12753 of 2013 WALJIS TRAVELS (I) PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagat Rana, Adv. versus GOVT. (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Chander, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) A vehicle of the petitioner-Company having registration No.DL1VA9820being driven by one Mr. Hira Singh was prosecuted for the following offences under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the MV Act): 66/192A Using Vehicle without Permit. 100(2)/177 Penalty for contravention of regulation. 6/177 138/37/177 violation of govt rules, of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with following allegations The vehicle driven bythe driver was coming from Lado Sarai to P.T.S. On checking, black glasses were found, without helpline number, Conductor number, driver number and owner number, thus violated the permit conditions. The driver of t...
Om Prakash Vs. Santosh Chaddha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t October, 2013. + RFA182003 OM PRAKASH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.K. Sood, Adv. Versus SANTOSH CHADDHA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Divya Attri, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 18th October, 2002 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi in Suit No.197/2001 filed by the appellant/plaintiff) insofar as declining the relief of specific performance of an Agreement to Sell of immovable property to the appellant/plaintiff, though decreeing the suit for refund of the earnest money paid by the appellant with interest.2. The appeal was admitted for hearing and vide ad-interim order dated 28th January, 2003 status quo directed to be maintained with respect to the suit property. It appears that the respondent/defendant had also preferred RFA No.769/2002 against the same judgment and decree. Vide order dated 27th Novemb...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Neeraj and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:31. t October, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 778/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Kunal Rawat, Adv. versus NEERAJ & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv. for R1 and R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 30.07.2010, whereby ld. Tribunal, while granting compensation in favour of the respondents / claimants, has deducted 1/4th towards the personal expenses.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that Veer Chand, father of the deceased, who appeared as PW4 was working in Railway and earning Rs.11,000/- per month. This fact has been admitted by the father of the deceased in his cross-examination. Thus, he was not dependent upon the deceased.3. I note, ld. Tribunal has considered 4 dependents, i.e., wife, daughter and parents. Accordingly, deducted 1/4th towards pe...
Union of India Vs. Anita Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:31. 10.2013 + WP(C) No.677of 2013 & CM No.1293 of 2013 2013 UNION OF INDIA Through: ....Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Adv. With Mr. P. Chaudhury, Adv. Versus ANITA SINGH ....Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The respondent before this Court vide application dated 8.8.2011 sought the following information from the PIO of the Passport Office, Ministry of External Affairs:1. Provide the photocopy of the passport with complete details of Shri Ajeet Singh son of Shri Ram Bahadur Singh, 496 and 498, dandi gadi cantt. Dehradoon. It was issued in 1997-98.2. Provide the certified Xerox copy of the date of birth certificate, education documents and residential proof certificates.2. The aforesaid information was refused by the PIO on the ground that being a third-party information, it was exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act. Being aggriev...
Lajjaram Mahor Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6408/2013 Date of decision:31. t October, 2013 % LAJJARAM MAHOR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Subhasish Mohanty and Mr.Bala Krishna Behura, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Saqib, Adv. and Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks in this case restoration of the first financial upgradation as per the Assured Career Progression Scheme (herein after referred to as ACP) w.e.f. 04th January 2004 when he completed 12 years of service with Central Industry Security Force (herein after referred as CISF) and became entitled for grant of second financial upgradation as per MACP Scheme w.e.f. 04th January, 2012.2. The undisputed facts in the instant case giving rise to the writ petition as are that as per the ACP scheme other than completion of 12 years of continuous service in the post of Constable, an employ...
Bhajan Singh Vs. Lt. Governor of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. 10.2013 + LPA1822008, C.M. No.5530/2008 (for stay) BHAJAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Sh. O.P. Saxena, Advocate. versus LT. GOVERNOR OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Ferida Satarawala, Advocate, for GNCTD/Resp. No.1. Sh. Ajay Verma, Advocate, for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. This appeal challenges an order of the learned Single Judge dated 07.04.2008 in proceedings initiated under Article 226 of the Constitution; the appellant (who has since expired) had sought a direction against the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) that he be allowed to continue occupying a place measuring 4x4 located at Safdarjung Enclave, near Kamal Cinema, New Delhi for the purpose of carrying on the business of running taxis. The proceedings are being contested by the son of the late appellant. LPA182/2008 Page 1 2. Brief...
Shri Harish Sharma Vs. Raj Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. 10.2013 + RFA (OS) 99/2013, C.M. NOS.12541-43/2013 & 12545/2013 SHRI HARISH SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Yashpal Singh with Sh. Rikesh Singh, Advocates. versus RAJ KUMAR AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Kush Sharma with Sh. Ishwar Upneja, Advocates, for Resp. Nos. 1 and 5. Sh. C. Prakash, Advocate, for Resp. Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. NO.12543/2013 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. C.M. No.12543/2013 is allowed in the above terms. RFA (OS) 99/2013 Page 1 RFA (OS) 99/2013, C.M. NOS.12541/2013 (for stay), 12542/2013 (for filing addl. Documents) & 12545/2013 (seeking exemption from filing deficient Court Fees and extension of time in making up the deficient Court Fee) 1. This is a Regular First Appeal from an order of a learned Single Judge in CS(...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »