Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sushil Adhar Vs. Maharaj Kishan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h October, 2013 % + RFA7742002 GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat & Ms. Tania Ahlawat, Advs. Versus MAHARAJ KISHAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajan Joshi & Mr. J.S. Rawat, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan with Ms. Latika Dutta, Advs. for R-2. AND + RFA1002003 SUSHIL ADHAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan with Ms. Latika Dutta, Advs. Versus MAHARAJ KISHAN & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajan Joshi & Mr. J.S. Rawat, Adv. for R-1. Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat & Ms. Tania Ahlawat, Advs. for R-2. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 Both appeals impugn the same judgment and decree dated 6 th September, 2002 (of the Court of the Addl. District Judge, Delhi in Suit No.15/2000 filed by the respondent no.1 in each appeal against the three appellants in RFA No.774/2002 and the appellant in RFA No.100/2003) of recovery of compensation in th...
Govt.of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Maharaj Kishan and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h October, 2013 % + RFA7742002 GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat & Ms. Tania Ahlawat, Advs. Versus MAHARAJ KISHAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajan Joshi & Mr. J.S. Rawat, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan with Ms. Latika Dutta, Advs. for R-2. AND + RFA1002003 SUSHIL ADHAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan with Ms. Latika Dutta, Advs. Versus MAHARAJ KISHAN & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajan Joshi & Mr. J.S. Rawat, Adv. for R-1. Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat & Ms. Tania Ahlawat, Advs. for R-2. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 Both appeals impugn the same judgment and decree dated 6 th September, 2002 (of the Court of the Addl. District Judge, Delhi in Suit No.15/2000 filed by the respondent no.1 in each appeal against the three appellants in RFA No.774/2002 and the appellant in RFA No.100/2003) of recovery of compensation in th...
Manohar Singh Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:25. 10.2013 W.P.(C) No.3340/2012 and CM No.11875/2013 MANOHAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:Mr.Om Prakash Gupta, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate for the respondent/UOI. Ms.Ferida Satawawala with Mr.Omar Siddiqui, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court came to attend a hearing before this Court on 7th September, 2011. According to him, when he was standing in the queue for issuance of a pass, a bomb exploded near Gates No.4 & 5 of the High Court building, as a result of which he was seriously injured and was taken to Dr.RML hospital. According to the petitioner, he was operated upon and foreign bodies were removed from his right leg. Vide its order dated 14th September, 2011 passed in WP(C) No.6686/2011, Gaurav Kumar Bansal v. Union of India & Ors., a Division Bench of this Court, dire...
Ram Avtar and ors. Vs. Prem Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. h October, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 999/2012 RAM AVTAR & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Adv. Versus PREM KUMAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Adv. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 19.03.2012, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation as under with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of institution of the claim petition till realization:1.2. 3.4.5. Loss of dependency Compensation in respect of medical bills prior to death of deceased Loss of Estate Loss of Love and Affection Funeral expenses & Transportation charges Total MAC.APP. 999/2012 : Rs.3,60,000/- : : : Rs.10,023/Rs.10,000/Rs.20,000/- : :2. The present appeal is for enhancement of the compensation amount as noted above.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submitted that the appellant...
M.M.Dutt Vs. National Insurance Co. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No7504/2010 25th October, 2013 M.M.DUTT .... Petitioner Through: None. versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Against the petitioner departmental proceedings were commenced prior to his retirement. The impugned order dated 2.7.2008 was thereafter passed not releasing gratuity, leave encashments and commutation of pension. This writ petition was thereafter filed for release of retiral benefits of leave encashments, gratuity and GSLIP.2. Counsel for respondent no.1 has placed on record the copy of the order dated 30.9.2013 passed by the disciplinary authority imposing a cut of Rs.2000/- per month from the pension payable to the petitioner.3. Therefore, so far as the gratuity and leave encashments are concerned, no deductions can be made and therefore, counsel fo...
M/S Gorkha Security Services Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:25. 10.2013 + WP(C) No.6718 of 2013 M/S GORKHA SECURITY SERVICES ....PETITIONER Through: Mr. K.K. Rai, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Rarkeshwar Nath and Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for Govt. of NCT of Delhi with Ms. Sana Ansari., Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court was awarded a contract to provide security services in Shri Dada Dev Matri Avum Shishu Chiktsalaya, Dabri, New Delhi 110045, for a period of one year with effect from 2.9.2011 to 1.9.2012. The petitioner, however, continued to provide services even thereafter. The case of the petitioner is that it has not been paid for the security services provided by it in terms of the aforesaid contract.2. Vide notice dated 4.8.2012, the respondents, referring to their earlier letter dated 17.10.2011, directed the petitioner t...
Rajbir Vs. Agricultural Produce Market Committee and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.5869/1999 25th October, 2013 RAJBIR .... Petitioner Through: None. Versus AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Tania Ahlawat, Adv. for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner prays for setting aside of the order dated 1.9.1997 terminating his services. Petitioner also claims reinstatement with all consequential benefits.2. Petitioner claims that he was falsely got involved in criminal case as per FIR1431994 and he was ultimately acquitted on 9.12.1997 in terms of the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi and whereafter when he approached the respondents no.1and 2/employer for reinstatement in services, he was not allowed to join duties. It is alleged that petitioners termination is illegal and therefore he claims that his termination order is to be set-...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Sh. Dhanesh Kumar JaIn and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 10.2013 + LPA7922013, C.M. No.16747/2013 (for stay), 16748/2013 (for condonation of delay) & 16749/2013 (for exemption) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant Through : Sh. N.N. Aggarwal, Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Sh. Rohit Gandhi, Advocates. versus SH. DHANESH KUMAR JAIN & ANR. Through : None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. NO.16748/2013 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons mentioned in the application, C.M. No.16748/2013 is allowed. C.M. No.16749/2013 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. LPA7922013 and C.M. No.16747/2013 1. This appeal by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) challenges an order of the learned Single Judge dated 18.09.2012 and the subsequent order in review dated 02.08.2013. Learned LPA7922013 Page 1 Single Judge had allowed the writ petition and directed the DDA...
Anita Raj Garhia and anr. Vs. M/S. Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22nd October, 2013 Date of Decision:25. h October, 2013 % + CO. APPL. No.1038/2013 IN CO. A. (SB) No.70/2011 ANITA RAJ GARHIA & ANR. Through: .....Appellants Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Vanita Bhargava, Advocate. versus M/S. ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. & ORS......Respondents Through: Dr. Lalit Bhasin with Mr. Mudit Sharma, Mr. Tanmaya Nirmal, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an application filed by the applicant seeking the following prayers:(a) clarify that the proposed amalgamation of the applicant herein with Asian Hotels (East) Ltd. will not be in violation or breach of the said order dated 24th October 2011; (b) In the alternative and without prejudice to prayer (a) above, this Honble Court be pleased to appropriately modify the order dated 24 October 2011, so as to specifically exclude the proposed amalgamation of Asian Hotels (East) Limited from the sc...
Surender Rode Vs. Madan Mohan Rode and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h October, 2013. + RFA7652006 SURENDER RODE Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Galib Kabir & Mr. Anurag Jain, Advs. Versus MADAN MOHAN RODE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar & Mr. S. Mohapatra, Advs. for R-1&2. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 15th November, 2006 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi of dismissal of Suit No.63/06/98 filed by the appellant. The said suit was filed by the appellant/plaintiff against his two brothers and two sisters, (i) for partition of property No.21-B, Bara Bazar Marg, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi and the remaining estate left behind by the mother of the parties Smt. Devki Devi Rode including cash, bank deposits, shares, debentures, vikas patras gold and silver ornaments etc., claiming 1/5th share therein; (ii) for rendition of accounts ...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »