Delhi Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dtc Vs. Narayan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
$~R-155 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5425/2001 Decided on 29th October, 2013 DTC Through ..... Petitioner : Mr. Uday N. Tiwary, Adv. versus NARAYAN SINGH Through ..... Respondent : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Respondent was working with the petitioner as a Conductor. He remained absent from duty for 211 days during the period 1 st January, 1991 to 30th November, 1991. Petitioner held an enquiry against the respondent on the charge that he was irregular in attending his duty and was not taking interest in the work, thus, had committed misconduct within the meaning of para 4(i) and 19(h) & (m) of the Standing Orders governing the conduct of the petitioners employees. Respondent did not participate in the enquiry and was proceeded against ex-parte. Enquiry Officer considered the evidence adduced by the petitioner and concluded that respondent was guilty of misconduct.2. Disciplinary Authority considered the enquiry report and ...
Directorate of Health Services Through: Its Secr Vs. Ms. Educational S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. 10.2013 + LPA532013, C.M. APPL. 1148/2013 & 1150/2013 DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES THROUGH: ITS SECRETARY AND ANR...... Appellants Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani with Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocates. versus MS. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr. Tanuj Khurana with Mr. Gaurav Malik, Advocates, for R-1 & 2. Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Advocate, for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The Government of NCT of Delhi is aggrieved by the directions contained in the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P. (C) 19209/2006 made on 30.08.2012.2. The respondent (hereafter referred to as the Society) had preferred a writ petition claiming certain reliefs which included a direction to the concerned authority, i.e., Government of NCT of Delhi to issue a sponsorship certificate in respect of its proposal to expand an ...
O.P.Gupta and anr Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:28. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 6990/2007 GHANSHYAM & ORS Through: versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Nishant Sharia, Adv. U.O.I & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Adv. W.P.(C) 3322/2008 & CM63762008 O.P.GUPTA & ANR Through: versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Nishant Sharia, Adv. UOI & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Adv. W.P.(C) 10539/2009 & CM No.9323/2009 SHIV KUMAR & ANR. Through: versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Nishant Sharia, Adv. UOI & OTHERS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.In these writ petitions, the petitioners are the licencees of the respondent- Indian Railways for providing catering/ vending services at railway stations and their contracts are being renewed from time to time. They had been paying the licence fees to the Indian Railways @ 12% of the annual sale turnover. Vide Circular No.51 of 2005 dated 09.12.200...
Smt. Anusha Tripathi Vs. Sh. Tejasvee Shastri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2013 Pronounced on:28. 10.2013 + MAT. APPL.(F.C.) 31/2013 SMT. ANUSHA TRIPATHI ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Vikas. K. Bharti, Advocate. versus SH. TEJASVEE SHASTRI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Poonam Mahajan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This is a wifes appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 seeking to enhance maintenance pendente lite awarded by the Trial Court by the impugned order dated 27.07.2013 for the appellant and her minor daughter.2. The appellant and respondent got married on 12.05.2009 at Indore and started living together along with the respondents parents. Within 9 months of the marriage, the respondent got a job as Vice- MAT.(FC)31-13 Page 1 President of Deutsche Bank and the couple moved to Jaipur, where the appellant delivered a baby girl named Saisha on 21.09.2010. On 25.10.2010, the appellant with ...
Bimla Devi and ors. Vs. Zile Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.340 of 2005 Reserved on: September 3, 2013 Decision on: October 28, 2013 BIMLA DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate. versus ZILE SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. V.P. Rana and Ms. Hetal Vora, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2810.2013 1. Bimla Devi, Plaintiff No.1 and her two daughters Mamta Dagar and Anita Sindhu, Plaintiffs 2 and 3 respectively, have filed this suit against Zile Singh and seven others for a declaration that the Plaintiffs are co-sharers in joint possession of 1/8th share out of 1/3rd share in the agricultural land comprising of Khewat No.24, Rect. No.19 (in several Killa Nos. as set out in para 5 of the plaint) to the total extent of 144 Kanals 15 Marlas (hereinafter the suit property) one-third of which works out to 48 Kanals and 5 Marlas.2. The Plaintiffs state that there existed a Joint Hindu Family (JHF) consisting of Zile Singh (Defendant No.1) and his sons Raj...
Vishweshwar @ Munna Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: October 28, 2013 CRL.A. 1359/2010 VISHWESHWAR @ MUNNA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Adv. Appellant present in custody. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Yogesh Verma, APP. SI Umed Singh, P.S. Nangloi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.* 1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 23 rd December, 2009 passed in SC No.19/3/09 arising from FIR No.711/08, P.S.Nangloi under section 302 IPC whereby the appellant has been held guilty for the offence punishable u/s 304 Part II IPC and the order of sentence dated 7th January, 2010 whereby the appellant has been sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years with fine of Rs.10000/- and in default to further undergo SI for one year.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions from appellant who is present in J.C, has submitted that appellant is not challenging his conviction u/s 304 Part II IPC. It is submitted...
Mohd. Monish Vs. Jamia Millia Islamia and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. 10.2013 + WP(C) No.6772 of 2013 & CM Nos.14690-91 MOHD. MONISH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Alamgir, Adv. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Manpreet Kaur for Ms. Jaya Goyal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court was a student of B.A. Course of the respondent university Jamia Millia Islamia. On receipt of a complaint that the petitioner was harassing a girl student of the university, a show-cause notice dated 8.5.2013 was issued to the petitioner, referring to the aforesaid complaint and asking him to submit his explanation on or before 4 pm on 10.5.2013. The petitioner responded to the aforesaid show-cause notice vide his reply dated 10.5.2013, stating therein that as they were together in the class of History fromwhere he started notice of her and approached her. She, however, gave a neutral reply and, therefore, he again appr...
Ghanshyam Dass Vs. Shakuntla Bakshi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: October 28, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.346/2012 & CM No.12793/2012 GHANSHYAM DASS Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Manoj Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Kapil Kaushik, Mr.V.K. Khurana and Mr.Ankur Saini, Advs. versus SHAKUNTLA BAKSHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ratan Kr. Singh, Adv. with Mr.Nikhlesh Krishnan, Mr.Saurav Sumkan, Mr.Shashi Bhushan and Mr.Jaipratap, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner (respondent No.2 in the eviction petition) has filed the abovementioned revision petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short, called the DRC Act) against the order dated 28th February, 2012 passed by the learned Rent Controller (South), Saket Courts, Delhi in Eviction Petition bearing No.E-216/09 whereby the eviction order was passed against the petitioner and respondents No.2 to 6 herein by dismissing the application for leave to contest in favour of re...
Shiv Kumar and anr. Vs. Uoi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:28. 10.2013 W.P.(C) 6990/2007 GHANSHYAM & ORS Through: versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Nishant Sharia, Adv. U.O.I & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Adv. W.P.(C) 3322/2008 & CM63762008 O.P.GUPTA & ANR Through: versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Nishant Sharia, Adv. UOI & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Adv. W.P.(C) 10539/2009 & CM No.9323/2009 SHIV KUMAR & ANR. Through: versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Nishant Sharia, Adv. UOI & OTHERS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.In these writ petitions, the petitioners are the licencees of the respondent- Indian Railways for providing catering/ vending services at railway stations and their contracts are being renewed from time to time. They had been paying the licence fees to the Indian Railways @ 12% of the annual sale turnover. Vide Circular No.51 of 2005 dated 09.12.200...
Shri Laxman Ram @ Nathi and anr. Vs. the New India Assurance Co Ltd an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:28. h October, 2013 % + CM(M) 1154/2013 SHRI LAXMAN RAM @ NATHI & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocate. Versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. .... Respondents Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.16923/2013 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM (M) No.1154/2013 1. The present petition is filed against the impugned order dated 17.11.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has modified the directions passed in the award dated 19.10.2011.2. Vide order dated 19.10.2011, while granting compensation, the learned Tribunal has directed as under:32. So far as the liability to pay the compensation is concerned, it is primary duty of R1 and R2 being driver and owner of offending vehicle and R3 being insurer of the offending vehicle is vicariously liable to pay compensation for the d...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »