Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Sugandhit Dhoop Vs. Rajinder Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 147/2012 SANJAY SUGANDHIT DHOOP Through : ..... Appellant Mr. S.P. Gautam and Mr. Jitender Nath Pathak, Adv. versus RAJINDER SINGH AND ANR. Through : ..... Respondents None CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN % ORDER 07 01.2013 The respondent No.1, who was employed with the appellant applied for leave on medical grounds and submitted a medical certificate in support of his application. The appellant asked him to get the same verified from ESIC, whereupon an industrial dispute was raised by him alleging termination of his services. Vide Award dated 29.1.2002, the Labour Court held that the act of the appellant amounted to retrenchment. The appellant filed WP(C) No.1760/2003 questioning the award dated 29.1.2002 passed by the Labour Court. In the writ petition, an application under Section 17-B of Industrial Disputes Act was filed by respondent No.1. The learned Single Judge, vide order dated 11th May, 2009 al...
DIn Mohd. (Deceased) and ors. Vs. the Dy. Custodian General of Evacuee ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 11.2012 Date of decision:07. 01.2013 + REV. PET. 198/2011, C.M. APPL. 4734/2011, 4735/2011 & 4736/2011 IN W.P. (C) 2385/1982 REV. PET. 436/2011, C.M. APPL. 11823/2011, 11824/2011, 11825/2011 & 11826/2011 IN W.P.(C) 2385/1982 DIN MOHD. (DECEASED) AND ORS. .Appellants Through: Sh. Sanjeev Narula and Sh. Ekram Ali, Advocates. Versus THE DY. CUSTODIAN GENERAL OF EVACUEE PROPERTY AND ORS. .Respondents Through: Sh. Sanjeev Sahay, Advocate, for Dy. Custodian. Sh. N.S. Vashisht, Advocate, for Review Petitioners. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This common judgment will dispose of two Review Petitions, i.e. Rev. Pet. 198/2011, preferred by the third-party/petitioner Ms. Neelam Arya (hereafter referred to by her name) and R.P.A. 436/2011, filed by the REV. PET. 198/11, REV. PET. 436/11 & pending applications Page 1 Deputy Custodian General, who was the respondent in the original writ petition. ...
inland Road Transportation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 27/2013 INLAND ROAD TRANSPORTATION PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr. R.N. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN % ORDER 07 01.2013 Vide allotment letter dated 16.11.2007, the appellant was awarded contract of leasing 25 tons VPU in Train No.3040/39 from Delhi to Howrah and back, for a period of three years. Pursuant thereto, an agreement dated 5.8.2008 was duly executed between the appellant and the respondents. In terms of clause 20.1 of the Lease Agreement, the contract awarded to the appellant was extended for a further period of two years.2. Vide order dated 27.10.2001, the respondent terminated the contract awarded to the appellant, alleging overloading by it. The termination order was challenged by the appellant before this Court by way of an OMP No.967/2011. The said OMP was disposed of by this Court on 1...
Weider Publications, Llc and anr. Vs. Shri Pushpendra Srivastav and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2508/2007 WEIDER PUBLICATIONS, LLC & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.S.C.Ladi, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Deeksha Kakar, Advocate. versus SHRI PUSHPENDRA SRIVASTAV & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Defendants are ex parte. % Date of Decision : January 07, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Plaintiffs being the publisher of the MUSCLE & FITNESS magazine have instituted the present suit against the Defendants engaged in publishing, selling and marketing of MUSCLES & FITNESS magazine seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants from printing, publishing, selling or offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in any publication and/or sale of magazines having the get-up, layout, content, printed matter, arrangement of articles/features, photographs and/or drawings identical to or substantially copied from the Plaintiffs magazine MUSCLE & FITNESS. The Plaintiffs have al...
Blue Star Ltd. Vs. M/S Unison Hotels Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 984/2008 BLUE STAR LTD. Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Arun Khosla and Ms. Shreeanka Kakkar, Advocates versus M/S UNISON HOTELS LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. S.K. Agarwal and Mr. S.K. Joshi, Advocates % Date of Decision : January 07, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.IA No.3864/2010 1. By way of this application under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC, 1908, the Defendant seeks rejection of the plaint on the ground that the present suit filed by the Plaintiff is barred by limitation.2. Before dealing with the present application, it would be necessary to give a brief background of the facts in the present suit. The Plaintiff is a Public Limited Company engaged in the business of installation and commissioning of central air-conditioning plants. In response to the Defendant Companys Notice Inviting Tenders with respect to the execution of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning wor...
M.M. Sehgal Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h January, 2013 + BAIL APPL. 1814/2012 M.M. SEHGAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Deepak Dhingra, Adv. with Mr. Nishant Arora, Adv. . versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.K.Modi, Adv. for the Complainant. BAIL APPL. 1842/2012 SMT. ANJALI SEHGAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Deepak Dhingra, Adv. with Mr. Nishant Arora, Adv. . versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.K.Modi, Adv. for the Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two Petitions for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) have been filed by the Petitioners M.M. Sehgal and his wife Smt. Anjali Sehgal.2. The case of the Petitioners is that the Petitioner M.M.Sehgal is aged 76 years while Petitioner ...
Cit Vs. Nipun Builders and Develpers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h December, 2012 Date of Decision:7. h January, 2013 % + ITA 120/2012 CIT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel versus NIPUN BUILDERS & DEVELPERS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Somnath Shukla, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.This is an appeal by the revenue filed u/s. 260A of the Income Tax Act. It relates to the assessment year 2004-05. The assessee is a private limited company which filed its return on a figure of loss which was accepted u/s. 143(1). On the basis of a report of the investigation wing of the incometax department, the assessment was reopened u/s.147 on the ground that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment, in as much as the share capital shown to have been received by the company was alleged to represent mere accommodation entries.2. In the course of the reassessment proceed...
Mahipal Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
$~R-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 07, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2507/2001 MAHIPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Under instructions from the petitioner learned counsel gives up all pleas except pertaining to the penalty levied upon the petitioner by urging that the penalty violates Rule 8(d)(ii) of the Delhi Police Punishment and Appeal Rules 1980.2. Vide order dated November 22, 1999, the Disciplinary Authority has levied the penalty upon the petitioner of reducing his pay by five stages in the time-scale of pay for a period of five years with further direction that during the period of reduction the petitioner will not earn increments and further on the expiration of the said period the reduction will have the effect of postponing pet...
Union of India and ors Vs. Durga Dutt Saini
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 07, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4340/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Amit Chadha with Mr.Atin Chadha, Advs. for UOI. versus DURGA DUTT SAINI ..... Respondent Represented by: Dr.M.P.Raju with Mr.J.P.Thomas, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. A petty sum of ` 8,287/- concerning the respondent is the subject matter of the instant writ petition.2. It is not in dispute that the respondent was working and continues to work in the Defence Accounts Department. Issue pertains to the year 2005 till the year 2010 when respondent raised a bill for reimbursement of one newspaper per day and for which he placed reliance upon an Office Memorandum dated September 13, 1996 which reads as under:Subject: Reimbursement in respect of Newspapers purchased/supplied to officers at their residence-guidelines regarding. It has come to the notice ...
Komol Ghose and anr. Vs. Annabelle Pereira and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
$~* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2146/2009 KOMOL GHOSE AND ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Dr.AmitabhaSen with Ms.Pooja Singh, Ms.MalyashreeSridharan, Advs. versus ANNABELLE PEREIRA & ANR ..... Defendants Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR 1 The plaintiffs have filed the present suit against the defendants for recovery of Rs. 20,49,145alongwithpendent lite and future interest @ 18% per annum. Initially, the suit was filed by the plaintiffs against defendant nos. 1 to 4 but later on the plaintiffs also impleaded Mr. Edwin Pereira as defendant No.5. Defendant nos. 1 to 4 were proceeded exparte vide order dated 5.4.2010 while defendant no.5 was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 21.3.2012.2. Defendant no.2 is the brother of defendant no.1 and defendant no.3 is the younger sister of defendant no.1. Defendant no.4, M/s. Bella Vista Hotels Pvt. Limited,is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and defendant nos. 1,2,3 and 5 are Directors...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »