Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ganesh Chand Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 08, 2013. + W.P.(C) 3754/2001 GANESH CHAND ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Suman Doval, Advocate and Mr.Vineet Kumar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.P.K.Singh, Advocate for Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Respondents No.3 and 4 filed O.A. No.607/1999 challenging the seniority list dated May 29, 1997 as also an order dated October 30, 1998 rejecting the representation made by them to correct the seniority list which assigned to the petitioner seniority above them.2. The list pertains to the post of L.D.C. in the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.3. Relevant facts are that the petitioner, impleaded as respondent No.3 in the O.A. was appointed as a Messenger (a Group-D post) in the Directorate of Film Festivals when it was a part of National Film Development C...
Satnam Dass Narang Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:04. 01.2013 Judgment pronounced on:08. 01.2013 LPA NO. 16/2013 SATNAM DASS NARANG Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Adv. versus D.D.A. Through : ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The appellant got himself registered with Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for allotment of an LIG flat under its New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979 (NPRS). At the time of registration, the appellant was residing at D-49, Sudarshan Park, New Moti Nagar, New Delhi and was working as a Pharmacist with Delhi Administration and posted at its dispensary at South Patel Nagar, New Delhi. Accordingly, at the time of registration, the appellant gave his residential address at D-49, Sudarshan Park, New Delhi and occupational address as Delhi Administration Dispensary, Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The appellant shifted from D-49, Sudarshan Park, New Delhi, t...
Rinku Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nctd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: January 8, 2013 + W.P.(C) 100/2013 RINKU KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCTD AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Shariq Mohammad, Advocate for R.1 to R.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG,J (Oral) CM No.217/2013 Allowed; subject to just exceptions. WP(C) 100/2013 1. This is the third cryptic order we have noticed today being passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal resulting in the matter being remanded. The Central Administrative Tribunal is the first fora where facts have to be noted and if there are rival versions, with reference to the record the correct facts have to be penned. Thereafter, the principle of law which is attracted for adjudication, if one arises, has to be noted followed by rival contentions noted and a reasoned decision taken.2. It is regretful that the Tribunal is not fol...
Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2013 + CRL.REV.P. 629/2012 ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Medhanshu Tripathi, Adv. with Mr. Harish Sharma, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 629/2012 and Crl.MA 18714/2012 (stay) 1. The Petitioner takes exception to the order dated 03.08.2012 whereby certain documents were put for admission to the Petitioner in the absence of his counsel. Relevant portion of the order is extracted hereunder:.. The accused has admitted the proceedings under Section 164 Cr.P.C., his own medical examination and also the FSL Report in this case. His statement has been recorded separately to this effect in view of which Ld. MM, the doctor who had prepared the MLC of the accused and the witnesses from the FSL, need not be called for examination..2. The learned (ASJ) noticed that the...
Maha Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police, Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 08, 2013 + WP(C) 3041/2001 MAHA SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nayar, Mr.Shashi Mohan, and Mr.Sanjay Abbot, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI & ORS. Respondents Represented by: Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, Ms.Bandana Shukla, and Ms.Megha Bhan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) WP(C) No.3041/2001 1. The petitioner was enlisted in Delhi Police on September 25, 1968 and was posted as an Assistant Sub Inspector at IGI Airport (FRRO) on January 05, 1995.2. The petitioner was charge-sheeted on May 22, 1995 and as per the order under which the charge-sheet was served containing the summary of allegations it was alleged against the petitioner that on January 05, 1995 at about 05:00 hours one Sh.Naseem Ahmed (the complainant-pax) disembarked at IGI Airport, New Delhi by flight not RJ-192 from Jeddah. Reporting at the Imm...
Uoi Vs. K.L.Bablani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 08, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1132/2012 UOI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus K.L.BABLANI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.A.K.Behera, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) WP(C) No.1132/2012 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The respondent was selected to be appointed as a member of the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission and for which letter offering appointment was issued to him on April 16, 2010 indicating therein that if he accepts the same he would have to join as a member of the Settlement Commission at its Kolkata Bench within 30 days i.e. by May 16, 2010.3. Being a member of the Indian Revenue Service (Custom & Central Excise) and eligible for the next increment on July 01, 2010, and if he would have earned an increment the future pension would be affected, respondent made a requ...
Amul Urhwareshe Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 1050/2012 AMUL URHWARESHE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vishal Gosain Adv. with Mr. Harsh Bora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. Mr. Ashok Anand Adv. with Ms. Priya Pathania, Adv. for R-2. CRL. M.C. 3071/2012 AMUL URHWARESHE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vishal Gosain Adv. with Mr. Harsh Bora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. Mr. Ashok Anand Adv. with Ms. Priya Pathania, Adv. for R-2. CRL. M.C. 3072/2012 AMUL URHWARESHE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vishal Gosain Adv. with Mr. Harsh Bora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. Mr. Ashok Anand Adv. with Ms. Priya Pathania, Adv. for R-2. CRL. M.C. 3073/2012 AMUL URHWARESHE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vishal Gosain Adv. with Mr. Harsh Bora...
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Raj Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 657/2012 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr J.S. Bhasin and Mr Anand Nandan, Advs. versus RAJ PAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr Atul T.N., Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN % 1. ORDER 08 01.2013 The respondent workman was employed with DTC as a driver. He met with an accident and was hospitalized. On regaining health, he reported for duty with a Medical Certificate recommending that he should be given light duty. The case of the appellant is that the respondent was sent for medical check-up and after receipt of the report of the Medical Board, declaring him unfit for the duty of a driver, he was given light duty. The respondent, according to the appellant, was supposed to go for medical examination at regular intervals, but he did not appear before the Medical Board on 19.02.1992 and raised an industrial dispute alleging removal from service.2. During pendency of the proceedings be...
Joginder Yesu Dass Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:08. h January, 2013 % + CRIMINAL APPEAL 899 2012 JOGINDER YESU DASS ..... Appellant Through Mr. A.J.Bhambhani, Advocate with Ms. Nisha Bhambhani and Ms. Bhavita Modi, Advocates. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr. Richa Kapoor, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Joginder Yesu Dass impugns his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of his wife Sheela Dass in the intervening night of 26/27th May, 2011, vide judgment dated 30th April, 2012 in Session Case No. 49/2011, arising out of FIR No. 204/2011 P.S. Malviya Nagar. By the impugned order dated 4th May, 2012, the appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 20,000/-, in default of payment of fine, he has to undergo Simple Imprisonment for three months.2. Homicidal death of Sheela Dass stands undisputedly established. Dr. Pankaj Kumar (PW-1), Se...
Narender Kukreja Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. M.C. No. 3920/2010 Date of Decision:8. h January, 2013 + # ! NARENDER KUKREJA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja,Advocate Versus $ * STATE & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for State Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This petition has been filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of the order dated 15th July, 2010 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in a criminal complaint(being C.C.No. 34/1/10) filed by respondent no.2 whereby he has been summoned as an accused for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The petitioner is the tenant under the complainant-respondent no.2 in a part of property no. K-146, Krishna Park Extension, New Delhi. The respondent no.2 filed a petition in the Court of Rent Controller for the eviction of the petitioner un...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »