Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Seema Chaturvedi Vs. Navyug School Educational Society and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) Nos. 5592/2010& 5738/2010 Reserved on:04. h January, 2013 Pronounced on:9. h January, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 5592/2010 SEEMA CHATURVEDI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Venkatraman & Mr.S.Seth, Advs. versus NAVYUG SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. B.B.Gupta with Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Ajandra Sisodiya, Adv. for R-3 and 5. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Adv. for Union of India. Mr. N.D.Kaushik for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv.for R-2. & + W.P.(C) 5738/2010 SHAILY SAPRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.K.Venkatraman & Mr. S.Seth, Advs. versus NAVYUG SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: W.P(C) 5592/2010 &5738/2010. Mr. B.B.Gupta with Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Ajandra Sisodiya, Adv. for R-3 and 38. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Adv. for Union of India. Page 1 of 11 Mr. N.D.Kaushik for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv.for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? ...
inderpal Thukral and anr Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h January, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 4370/2012 INDERPAL THUKRAL & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja with Mr. Viabhav Jairaj, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State/Respondent No.1. Mr. Bipin Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 along with Mr. Pradeep K. Srivastava, Sr. Manager, Kotak Mahindra Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) preferred by the Petitioners for quashing of FIR No.362/2005, under Section 420/406/120-B/34 IPC, Police Station Ambedkar Nagar and consequential proceedings arising out of the same.2. FIR No.362/2005 was recorded in Police Station Ambedkar Nagar with the allegations that the Petitioners along with one Smt. Nirmala Thukral (since expired) approached Citifinancial Consumer Finance (India) Ltd. for grant of lo...
Shaily Sapra Vs. Navyug School Educational Society and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) Nos. 5592/2010& 5738/2010 Reserved on:04. h January, 2013 Pronounced on:9. h January, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 5592/2010 SEEMA CHATURVEDI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Venkatraman & Mr.S.Seth, Advs. versus NAVYUG SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. B.B.Gupta with Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Ajandra Sisodiya, Adv. for R-3 and 5. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Adv. for Union of India. Mr. N.D.Kaushik for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv.for R-2. & + W.P.(C) 5738/2010 SHAILY SAPRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.K.Venkatraman & Mr. S.Seth, Advs. versus NAVYUG SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: W.P(C) 5592/2010 &5738/2010. Mr. B.B.Gupta with Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Ajandra Sisodiya, Adv. for R-3 and 38. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Adv. for Union of India. Page 1 of 11 Mr. N.D.Kaushik for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv.for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? ...
Dileep B. Nevatia Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its Chief Secretar ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
This application has been filed by a Senior Citizen of Worli Sea face, commonly known as Khan Addul Gaffar Khan Road, Mumbai under Section 18 read with Section 14 of the NGT Act, 2010, alleging, inter-alia, violation of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 made under the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 by vehicles using multi-tone horns and sirens. It is alleged that the vehicles fitted with multi-tone horns are emitting sounds in far excess of the levels affecting the ambient noise, which goes beyond the prescribed standards as provided under the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000. The main prayer made pertains to specifying standards for sirens and multi-tone horns fitted in the vehicles and to ban vehicles fitted with such sirens / multi-tone horns with excess of the stipulated standards to ply on the road. Initially the D.G. Police of the State was not impleaded as party to the application but then in course of hearing on t...
M/S. Sree Bajrang Oil and Flour Mill Through Its Partner Shri Prabhu D ...
Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
M/s Sree Bajrang Oil and flour Mill represented through its proprietor has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 inter-alia praying to review/modify a portion of the judgment dated 07th September, 2012 delivered in Application No. 38 of 2011 (Rohit Chaudhary Vs. Union of India and Ors.). 2. Shri Rohit Choudhary, the Applicant of the original Application is a resident of village Bokakhat and being concerned about the ecology of the area and future of Indian rhinoceros, elephants and species of flora and fauna available in Kaziranga National Park, approached this Tribunal in Application No. 30 of 2011 praying for issuance of directions to the Authorities to regulate quarrying and mining activities which were illegally existing in and around Kaziranga National Park. According to the Applicant inspite of the Notification dated 05th July, 1996 issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forests declaring a No Development Zone (NDZ), rampant industr...
Sub-inspector Tariq Ali Khan Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 08, 2013 + W.P.(C) 94/2013 SUB-INSPECTOR TARIQ ALI KHAN ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sourabh Ahuja, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chopra with Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Pertaining to an incident which allegedly took place on September 11, 1998 in which it was alleged that the writ petitioner tampered with the visa on the passport of Era, a young bride who was proceeding for a honeymoon with her beau and extorting US $500, a FIR for offence punishable under Section 384 IPC read with Section 12 of the Passport Act were registered.2. Now, an act may constitute a civil wrong as also a criminal wrong. If it so does, it is settled law that it would entail a civil action as also a criminal action.3. Pertaining to the same act and in the context of it be...
Naveen Swami Vivekanand B.Ed College Vs. National Council for Teacher ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6797/2011 % Judgment dated 08.01.2013 NAVEEN SWAMI VIVEKANAND B.ED COLLEGE ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Sanjay Shahrawat, Adv. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Pleadings in this matter are complete. With the consent of counsel for the parties writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. Present writ petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to quash the impugned order dated 26.5.2011 passed by the Appeal Committee of respondent no.1 NCTE in an appeal filed by petitioner against the order dated 30.1.2011 passed by Western Regional Committee by which the recognition granted to the petitioner on 07.11.2003 for B.ED Course from 2004-2005 academic session subsequently extended on regular basis by WRC by order dated 09.07.2004 s...
Sandeep and ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 41/2013 SANDEEP & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ramashankar Adv. with Mr. Shivom Garg, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) preferred by the Petitioners for quashing of FIR No.697/2007, under Section 498-A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Okhla Industrial Area and consequential proceedings arising out of the same.2. FIR No.697/2007 dated 17.08.2007 was registered in the Police Station Okhla Industrial Area on the statement of Smt. Lalita (Respondent No.2) with regard to allegations of cruelty, demand of dowry and non return of the dowry articles.3. A Petition for obtaining divorce by mutual consent was preferred by the Petitioner No.1 and Respondent...
Rajinder Kumar Vs. Punjab National Bank and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2888/2012 Judgment reserved on:7. h November, 2012 Judgment delivered on:8. h January, 2013 % RAJINDER KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Bhalla, Advocate. Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking the relief as under:Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the Clarificatory guidelines issued by the Respondent Bank for promotion process, promotion from MMG/S-III to SMG/S-IV for the year 2012-2013 vide P.A.D. Circular No. 88 dated 8.5.2012 with further directions to the Respondent Bank to consider the Petitioner for ensuing promotion process from MMG/S-III to SMG/S-IV for the year 2012-2013.2. It is pertinent to mention here that on the first date of hearin...
Amul Urhwareshe Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 3072/2012 AMUL URHWARESHE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vishal Gosain Adv. with Mr. Harsh Bora, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. Mr. Ashok Anand Adv. with Ms. Priya Pathania, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Petition is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in Crl.MC No.1050/2012 titled AMUL URHWARESHE v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE JANUARY 08 2013 vk...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »