Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surinder Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
$~R-37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 10, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4371/2001 SURINDER SINGH ...Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sarvesh Bisaria, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ravinder Agarwal and Mr.Amit Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. O.A. No. 1257/1998 filed by the writ petitioner has been dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal as per the impugned order dated March 09, 2001.2. The Recruitment Rule for the post of Chief Enforcement Officer has a feeder cadre consisting of:- (i) Enforcement Officer; (ii) Office Superintendent.3. The Recruitment Rule does not provide for any quota; and this would mean that an integrated/combined seniority list of Enforcement Officers and Office Superintendents is prepared by the Department from which eligible candidates are considered for promotion.4. In the Original Application, vide para 4(c), a...
Uoi and ors. Vs. Association of Junior Engineers, Central Water Com
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 10, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4432/2001 UOI & ORS. ...Petitioners Represented by: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Mr.A.S.Singh and Ms.Sangita Rai, Advocates. versus ASSOCIATION OF JUNIOR ENGINEERS, CENTRAL WATER COMMISSION & ORS. Represented by: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Association of Junior Engineers, Central Water Commission and all its members working as Junior Engineers are the beneficiaries of a majority opinion pronounced by the Central Administrative Tribunal.2. There being a split verdict between two members of the Tribunal, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench which opined that the correct course should be to refer the matter to a third member and not a reference to a Larger Bench, and in this way the opinion dated January 10, 2001 pronounced by the third member became the majority opinion. Simply stated the majority opinion notes t...
Subhash Chander Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 10, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8253/2011 SUBHASH CHANDER ..... Petitioner Represented by: Petitioner in person versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber and Ms.Akriti Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a challenge has been made to the order dated May 20, 2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.1810/2011 wherein prayer of the petitioner for the grant of benefit of Second Assured Progression Career Scheme w.e.f. August 9, 1999 and also for the entitlement of arrears from the said date has been rejected.2. The petitioner had joined the service in the office of Pay and Accounts Office, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting as a Junior Accountant on July 7, 1979. On account of qualifying the JAO (C) Examination...
The Secretary (Health) Health and Family Welfare Vs. Lok Nayak Hospita ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision: January 10, 2013 W.P.(C) 6668/2012 THE SECRETARY (HEALTH) HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate. versus LOK NAYAK HOSPITAL PARA MEDICAL & TECHNICAL UNION & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Arjun Pant, Advocate for R.3. AND W.P.(C) 7495/2012 MANOJ KUMAR DHAKA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Sudarshan Rajan, Advocate with Mr. Sarwan Ritam, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for R.1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. Pertaining to W.P.(C) No.6668/2012 we find that none appears for the respondent No.1 in spite of service being effected and the matter being passed over once. As regards respondent No.2, we find that he was a co...
Manoj Kumar Dhaka and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision: January 10, 2013 W.P.(C) 6668/2012 THE SECRETARY (HEALTH) HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate. versus LOK NAYAK HOSPITAL PARA MEDICAL & TECHNICAL UNION & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Arjun Pant, Advocate for R.3. AND W.P.(C) 7495/2012 MANOJ KUMAR DHAKA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Sudarshan Rajan, Advocate with Mr. Sarwan Ritam, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for R.1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. Pertaining to W.P.(C) No.6668/2012 we find that none appears for the respondent No.1 in spite of service being effected and the matter being passed over once. As regards respondent No.2, we find that he was a co...
Ntpc Ltd Vs. Dcit and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 14562/2006 NTPC LTD ... Petitioner versus DCIT & OTHERS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : For the Respondents : Mr S. E. Dastur, Sr Advocate with Mr Muralidhar, Ms Bindu Saxena, Ms Aparajita Swarup, Ms Neha Khattar and Mr K. K. Patra Ms Prem Lata Bansal, Sr Advocate with Mr Ruchir Bhatia CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J 1.By way of this writ petition, the National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC Limited), a public sector undertaking, is seeking the quashing of a notice dated 03.02.2006 issued by the respondent No.1 (Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi) issued purportedly under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), whereby the said respondent No.1 has indicated that he has reason to believe that the petitioners income chargeable to ta...
Daljit Singh Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.16651/2006 % January 10, 2013 DALJIT SINGH ...... Petitioner Through: None. versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Sujata Kashyap, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the Government of NCT of Delhi as he retired from the post of a superintendent from the District Courts, Delhi on 31.5.1995. The petitioner holds the valid medical facility card No.17604 issued by the respondent No.1. The petitioner went through CABG heart operation in the Escorts Heart Institute at New Delhi on 30.5.2002 by informing the District and Sessions Judge office in advance on 22.5.2002. For the treatment and operation of the petitioner a total amount of Rs.2,02,343/- was charged by the Escorts Heart Institute, however, petitioner was only given a reimbursement of Rs.1,01,746/- by the respondent No.1, leading t...
Balkishan and ors. Vs. D.T.C. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
S-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:10. 01.2013 % W.P.(C) 6681/2007 BALKISHAN & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. D.K. Aggrawal, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Virendra Kr. Singh, Advocate. versus D.T.C. & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. J.S. Bhasin & Ms. Rashmi Priya, Advocates for the respondent/DTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioners in the present writ petition assail the common order dated 03.04.2007 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court-XX in L.C.A. No.103A/2006 (Old No.324/1993) and in L.C.A. No. 103B/2006 (Old No.732/1992). The present petition has been preferred by the workmen/applicants aggrieved by the decision in L.C.A. No.103A/2006.2. At the outset, I may give a background summary of the relevant facts & circumstances. It appears that in the year 1983, in Delhi Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the DTC) an interim relief of wage revision was granted to the employees, which wa...
Rambagh Palace Hotels Private Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Incom ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :11. h December, 2012 Date of Decision :10. h January, 2013 % + + + W.P.(C) 7023/2010 W.P.(C) 8825/2011 W.P.(C) 7206/2012 + RAMBAGH PALACE HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. C. S. Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. W.P.(C) 7513/2010 MAHARAJ JAI SINGH Through: versus INCOME TAX OFFICER Through: + ..... Petitioner Mr. C. S. Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. W.P.(C) 7516/2010 MAHARAJ PRITHVIRAJ SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. C. S. Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: These are five writ petitions of which ...
Suneel Kumar Khatri Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2826/2012 Date of decision:10th January, 2013 % SUNEEL KUMAR KHATRI Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Saqib, Adv. with Mr. Joshi, AR/CRPF. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner in the instant case has sought quashing of the order dated 10th October, 2011 and 9th December, 2011 whereby his case has been wrongly rejected for fixation of his basic pay as well as appropriate seniority in the rank of Assistant Commandant w.e.f. 2nd August, 2005 which would have been at par with his batch mates. The petitioner has further sought for issuance of a writ of mandamus seeking a direction to the respondents to correct their error and to treat the petitioner as having been promoted to the rank of Assistant Commandant w.e.f. 2nd August, 2005 as well as fixation of his pay and increments according...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »