Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pacific Convergence Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Data Access (India) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 23 26 + CO.PET. 292 of 2004 PACIFIC CONVERGENCE CORPN. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Chandni Goel, Advocate versus DATA ACCESS (INDIA) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. H. Karthik Seshadiri, Advocate for K.C. Palanisamy, Cheran Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & K.C. Palanisamy Associate Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Mr. Dhruv Wahi, Ms. Shalini Rawat, Mr. Ashish Singh, Mr. Brijesh Choudhary, Advocates for Cheran Ent. (P) Ltd. Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aniruddha Choudhury & Mr. Abhay Narula, Advocates Mr. Puneet Gupta and Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Senior Standing Counsel for IT Department WITH + CCP (CO.) 31 of 2005 CANARA BANK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aniruddha Choudhury & Mr. Abhay Narula, Advocates Versus NEENA ANAND & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for OL Mr. Amol Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.7 Mr. Dhruv Wahi, Ms. Shalini Rawat, Mr. Ashish Singh, Mr. Brijesh Choudhary, Advo...
Mon Mohan Kohli Vs. Natasha Kohli
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
$~ 38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 684/2010 & CM.13618/2010 % Judgment dated 17.01.2013 MON MOHAN KOHLI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ankur Mahindroo, Advocate versus NATASHA KOHLI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajshekhar Rao, Ms.Anu Bagai, Mr.Bhuvan Mishra and Ms.Manini Brar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition is directed against the order dated 10.03.2010 passed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi, whereby an application filed by the petitioner (husband) under Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure for passing a decree of annulment of marriage in view of admission made by the respondent (wife) in the written statement, was rejected.2. Petitioner was married to the respondent on 14.11.1994 and a male child was born out of their wedlock. The petitioner has filed a petition for grant of divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the ground of crue...
iqbal Ahmed Vs. Syed Kausar Ali and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :17. h January, 2013 % + RC.REV. 345/2012 IQBAL AHMED Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Sudhir Kumar and Mr.Anish Shresta, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus SYED KAUSAR ALI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.B.B.Gupta and Mr.Anshul Mittal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) RC.Rev. No.345/2012 1. Eviction Petition No.281/2010 was filed against the present petitioner by the respondents seeking his eviction from Premises No.1681 (entire ground floor), Gali Shaban, Mohalla Rodgran, Lal Kuan, Delhi-110006. The petitioner filed application seeking leave to defend on the various grounds mentioned in the application.2. By impugned order dated 23.04.2012, while dismissing the application seeking leave to defend, the eviction order was passed against the petitioner in respect of the premises shown red in the site plan Ex.C-1 clarifying that eviction order shall not become executable befo...
Commissioner Value Added Tax Vs. M/S. Carzonrent India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:27. 09.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:17. 01.2013 + ST.APPL. 5/2011 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD + ST.APPL. 6/2011 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent + ST.APPL. 7/2011, C.M. APPL. 10492/2011 & Cross Appeal 13377/2012 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. A L D AUTOMATIVE PVT LTD + ST.APPL. 8/2011 COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. L & T FINANCE LTD + ST.APPL. 9/2011 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX Versus M/S. DIGITECH SYSTEMS ST.APPL.4/11, 5/11, 6/11, 7/11, 8/11, 9/11 & 16/11 ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent Page 1 + ST.APPL. 16/2011 CARZONRENT (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Parag. P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Monisha Handa, Advocates, ...
Lucknowi Heritage and ors Vs. G.E. Money Financial Services Ltd and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on: January 17, 2013 + OMP No.12/2013 LUCKNOWI HERITAGE & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Prabhjit Jauhar, Adv. versus G.E. MONEY FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through None appeared on behalf of respondents despite of advance service. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A.Nos.253/2013 & 254/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. OMP No.12/2013 1. The petitioners have filed the abovementioned petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, called the Act) for setting-aside the arbitration Award dated 29th August, 2012 passed by the Arbitrator. The Award was received by the petitioners on 4 th September, 2012.2. Petitioner No.1 is a partnership firm and petitioners No.2 & 3 are its partners. They are carrying on their business in Mumbai. Respondent No.1 is a limited Company engaged i...
Dda and ors. Vs. Pragati Construction Co. P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:17. 01.2013 + RFA(OS) 8/2013 DDA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Maldeep Sidhu and Sh. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocates. versus PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CO. P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Amit Prabhat Deshpande, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) For detailed order, please see judgment of even date passed in RFA (OS) 5/2013 titled DDA & Ors. v. Rama Associates Pvt. Ltd. . S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA (JUDGE) JANUARY 17 2013 RFA (OS) 8/2013 Page 1...
Nirbhay Trehan Vs. Vijay Bhardwaj and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h January, 2013 % + CS(OS) 1387/2009 NIRBHAY TREHAN Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Pawan Madan, Adv. versus VIJAY BHARDWAJ & ANR ..... Defendants Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.25,25,000/- from the two defendants and for recovery of an additional sum of Rs.5,00,000/- from the defendant No.2 ICICI Bank, together with interest @ 18% per annum, pendente lite and future and costs.2. Summons of the suit were issued to the two defendants. It is the case of the plaintiff in the plaint itself that the defendant No.1 at the time of institution of the suit was in District Prison, Gurgaon being an accused in FIR No.117/2008 under Section 320 IPC and under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 of Police Station Civil Lines, Gurgaon. Though the order dated 18.03.2011 records that the plaintiff had filed an affidavit of service ...
Carzonrent (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Value Added Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:27. 09.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:17. 01.2013 + ST.APPL. 5/2011 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD + ST.APPL. 6/2011 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent + ST.APPL. 7/2011, C.M. APPL. 10492/2011 & Cross Appeal 13377/2012 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. A L D AUTOMATIVE PVT LTD + ST.APPL. 8/2011 COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. L & T FINANCE LTD + ST.APPL. 9/2011 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX Versus M/S. DIGITECH SYSTEMS ST.APPL.4/11, 5/11, 6/11, 7/11, 8/11, 9/11 & 16/11 ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent Page 1 + ST.APPL. 16/2011 CARZONRENT (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Parag. P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Monisha Handa, Advocates, ...
Dtc Vs. Hanumant Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:17. 01.2013 % W.P.(C) 717/2011 & C.M. No. 1512/2011 DTC Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate versus HANUMANT KUMAR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner/DTC has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 28.10.2009 passed by the Labour Court holding that the inquiry conducted by the petitioner against the respondent/workman was not just fair and proper. The petitioner also assails the award dated 03.06.2010 passed by the Labour Court in ID No.155/2007 arising out of reference no.F-24(892)/06 Lab/2626-30 dated 01.10.2007 made by the appropriate government, which reads as follows: Whether the punishment of removal from service awarded to Sh. Hanumant Kumar, S/o Brahma Nand, Driver Badge No.19511 by the management of DTC vide order dated 06.09.2004 i...
Krishan Lall and anr Vs. Bhawani Shankar Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
26 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1416/2011 & I.A. 9398/2011 KRISHAN LALL & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Pooja M. Saigal, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Sharma and Mr. Vivek Singhal, Advocates. versus BHAWANI SHANKAR SHARMA Through: None. ..... Defendant Date of Decision:17. h January, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed with the following prayers:a) pass a decree in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the defendant for the recovery of possession of the leased premises being First Floor No. A-246, New Friends Colony, New Delhi25. b) pass a decree for a sum of Rs. 3,25,000 (Rupees Three Lakh Twenty Five Thousand Only) in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the defendant being arrears of rent which have accrued on the property for the period from September, 2010 to March, 2011 alongwith interest @18% per annum till realization thereof. c) to pass a decree towards mesne profits in favour of the Plain...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »