Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Dillip Kumar Samal Vs. All India Institute Medical Science and Oth ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J): 1. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in selecting the third respondent for the post of Senior Resident/Senior Demonstrator (ENT) for the Session July, 2012, the applicant has filed the present Original Application seeking for the following relief(s): This Honble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order for quashing and setting aside the selection of Mr. Mohammad Mubashshirul Haq for the post of Senior Residents, ENT under the OBC category for the Session July, 2012. This Honble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order directing the Respondents to declare the applicant as selected on the post of Senior Residents/Senior Demonstrator under OBC category for the Session July, 2012. Any other relief, order or directions which this Honble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. 2. The factual matrix of the applicants case would reveal that he belongs to Other Backward ...
Shri Gian Ganga Vocational Educational Society Vs. Cit, Rohtak
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2013
A.D. Jain, Judicial Member This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 17.10.2012 passed by the ld. CIT, Rohtak, u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the application filed by the assessee for registration. The assessee has taken the following effective grounds of appeal:- "1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) is bad both in the eye of law and on facts. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT has erred both on facts and in law in rejecting the application of the assessee for grant of registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT has erred both on facts and in law in rejecting the application of the assessee for registration under Section 12A despite the same being complete and was in compliance to the provisions of the Act. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the lea...
Shri R.S. Vashisth Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) Nos.17560/2005 & 17563/2005 % 1. January 17, 2013 W.P.(C) No.17560/2005 SHRI R.S. VASHISTH Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate with Mr. Vikram Saini, Advocate. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through:2. ..... Respondents Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Mayank Manish, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Advocate for respondent No.3. W.P.(C) No.17563/2005 SHRI R.S. VASHISTH Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate with Mr. Vikram Saini, Advocate. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through: WP(C) Nos.17560 and 17563 of 2005 ..... Respondents Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate for respondent No.1. Page 1 of 9 Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Mayank Manish, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.17...
Sanjeev Yadav Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
$~R-27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 17, 2013 + WP(C) 3522/2001 SANJEEV YADAV .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.S.K.Sharma, Mr.Puneet Relan, and Mr.Prayas Aneja, Advocates. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.S.D.Salwan, Advocate for GNCT of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Petitioner, Sanjeev Yadav, applied for being appointed as a Constable in Delhi Police and cleared the physical test conducted on June 20, 1998. On July 19, 1998 he was successful at the written examination. Unfortunately for him, before he could receive the letter offering appointment and he accepting the same and proceeding to fill up the enrolment form, on July 31, 1998, he was booked for an offence punishable under Section 279/337 IPC in respect whereof FIR No.486/1998; naming him as the offender was registered at PS Saraswati Vihar.2. Required to fill up the enrolment form afte...
Amir Raza Zaidi Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: January 17, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4763/2012 AMIR RAZA ZAIDI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajat Aneja and Ms.Swati Gupta, Advocates versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR .... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anshuj Dhingra and Mr.Anubhav Mehrotra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 4763/2012 and CM No. 9852/2012 (for directions) 1. The petitioner Amir Raza Zaidi along with his colleagues who were appointed as Compounder (Unani) by MCD between various dates in the year 1975 and 1979 had a grievance pertaining to they not being promoted in view of the fact that they had the requisite degree or diploma to be appointed as Unani Hakims. When they joined service, 50% posts of Unani Hakims were to be filled up by direct recruitment and the remainder 50% posts by promotion. The eligibility condition to be considered for promotion was five y...
The Oriental Insu. Co. Ltd Vs. C.i.T.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 01.2013 ITR 113-117/1998 THE ORIENTAL INSU. CO. LTD ... Appellant versus C.I.T. ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr M. S. Syali, Sr Advocate with Mr Mayank Nagi and Mr Prakhar Dixit : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Mr Puneet Gupta CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. In these references, several common questions have been referred to this Court. The assessees references are ITR 113/1998 and ITR 114/1998 pertaining to the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82, respectively. The departments references are ITR 115/1998, ITR 116/1998 and ITR 117/1998, which pertain to the assessment years 198081 and 1981-82. In ITR 113/1998, which is the assessees reference, the following questions have been referred to this Court for consideration:- (I) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and a true...
Amit Rahi Vs. Jawahar Lal Nehru University and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h January, 2013 % + LPA No.805/2012 AMIT RAHI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Asutosh Lohia with Ms. Neelam Sharma & Ms. Abha Verma, Advs. Versus JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.C. Dhanda & Ms. Sagari Dhanda, Advs. for JNU. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 13.08.2012 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.7018/2011 preferred by the appellant. The counsel for the respondent University appeared on advance notice and with consent of the counsels, the appeal was heard finally at the admission stage and judgment reserved.2. The writ petition from which this appeal arises was preferred impugning the denial by the respondent University to the petitioner of direct admission to Ph.D (Biotechnology) programme commencing from the year 2011 on the ground of the appellant not meet...
Commissioner of Value Added Tax Delhi Vs. M/S. Carzonrent India Pv. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:27. 09.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:17. 01.2013 + ST.APPL. 4/2011 COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX DELHI ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD + ..... Respondent ST.APPL. 5/2011 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD + ST.APPL. 6/2011 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. CARZONRENT INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent + ST.APPL. 7/2011, C.M. APPL. 10492/2011 & Cross Appeal 13377/2012 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. A L D AUTOMATIVE PVT LTD + ST.APPL. 8/2011 COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner Versus ST.APPL.4/11, 5/11, 6/11, 7/11, 8/11, 9/11 & 16/11 Page 1 M/S. L & T FINANCE LTD + ST.APPL. 9/2011 COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner Versus M/S. DIGITECH SYSTEMS + ST.APPL. 16/2011 CARZONRENT (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDE...
Shiromani Gurudwara Prabhandhak Committee and anr Vs. Union of India a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:17. 01.2013 FAO (OS) 298/2010 SHIROMANI GURUDWARA PRABHANDHAK COMMITTEE AND ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashok Kashyap, Mr. Virender Verma nd Mr. Gursimran Singh, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr Rajesh Katyal, Adv. for R-1 & R2 None for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.(Oral) . 1 The present appeal has a saga of 27 years of dispute and the issue arose at the threshold itself i.e. whether the appellant was entitled to sue as an indigent person within the meaning of Order XXXIII of the Code of the Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the said Code). We are informed that out of these 27 years, almost 23 years were spent in the proceedings before the Chief Ministerial Officer who had the occasion to deal with evidence about the status of being an indigent person....
Col.V. Katju Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h January, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay) COL.V. KATJU Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Adv. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. for DDA. Mr. Sumit Bansal & Mr. Ateev Mathur, Advs. for R-3. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This writ petition filed in public interest seeks the quashing of the allotment dated 18th February, 2002 by the respondent No.1 Delhi Development Authority (DDA) of land admeasuring 321.20 sq.m. in respect of the designated park situated in H-Block, Saket, New Delhi in favour of the respondent No.3 Gurudwara Prabhandak Committee and further seeks a direction to the respondent No.1 DDA and respondent No.2 Municipal Council of Delhi (MCD) to demolish the structure existing thereon and remove the encroachment over the said land.2. Notice of the petition ...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »