Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamal Singh @ Kalu Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :3. D JANUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :21. t JANUARY, 2013 + CRL.A.370/2011 KAMAL SINGH @ KALU ....Appellant Through : Mr.Anupam Sharma, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Through : AND + .Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CRL.A.551/2011 & CRL.M.B.1289/2012 MAHENDER @ LAMBOO ....Appellant Through : Mr.Mukesh Kalia with Mr.Hari Sharan Singh, Advocates. versus THE STATE Through : .Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Appellants- Kamal Singh @ Kalu (A-1) and Mahender @ Lamboo (A-2) have preferred the present appeals against the judgment dated 29.01.2011 and order on sentence dated 01.02.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.348/2007 by which they were held guilty and convicted for committing offences punishable under Section 186/353/307/34 IPC. A-2 was further convicted under Section 27 of the Arms Act. Both the appellants were sentenced to undergo RI for three months under Section...
Mahender @ Lamboo Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :3. d JANUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :21. t JANUARY, 2013 + CRL.A.551/2011 & CRL.M.B.1289/2012 MAHENDER @ LAMBOO ....Appellant Through : Mr.Mukesh Kalia with Mr.Hari Sharan Singh, Advocates. versus THE STATE Through : .Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file Crl.A.No.370/2011 titled Kamal Singh @ Kalu Vs. State of Delhi. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE January 21, 2013 of...
indraprastha Power Generation Company Ltd. Vs. Amarjeet Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 09.01.2013 Judgment delivered on:21. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 5266/2011 and C.M. No.10681/2011 (for stay) (arising out of D.I.D. No.24/2009) INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate. versus RAMA KANT SHARMA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Salim Inamdar & Mr. Vedanta Varma, Advocates for the respondent No.1. Mr. Dhanesh Relan & Ms. Richa Kaushal, Advocates for the respondent No.2. + W.P.(C) 5433/2011 and C.M. No.11077/2011(for stay) (arising out of D.I.D No.27/2009) INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate. versus AMARJEET SINGH AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Salim Inamdar & Mr. Vedanta Varma, Advocates for the respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal & Mr. Hem Kumar, Advocates for the respondent No.2/GNCTD. + W.P.(C) 5553/2011and C.M. No. 11347/2011(for stay) (arising out of D.I.D No.26/2009) INDRAPRAST...
D.K.Chakraborty Vs. S.P.Roy Chaudhary and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : January 16, 2013 Pronounced on : January 21, 2013 + CRL.REV.P. 55/2007 D.K.CHAKRABORTY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.P.N.Bhan, Advocate versus S.P.ROY CHAUDHARY & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Advocate for respondent/accused Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT 1 Acquittal of respondent accused for the offence of kidnapping for ransom is under challenge in this revision petition by the Complainant/first informant. The factual matrix of this case as noted in the impugned order is as under:Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 11.05.1995 Shri D.K. Chakarvorty lodged a report Ex.PW 1/A at P.S. Rajender Nagar regarding the kidnapping of his wife and demand of money by accused. On the said complaint, a case U/s 365 IPC was got registered which was investigated by SI Inder Singh. During Investigation, I.O. visited the house of complain...
V.S. Murthy Vs. State (Cbi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL. A. NO.592/1999 + # ! Date of Decision: January 21, 2013 V.S. MURTHY ....Appellant Through: Mr. Satish Tamta & Ms. Nisha Nayarnan, Advs. Versus $ Respondent Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Adv. STATE (CBI) AND CRL. A. NO.593/1999 DR. R.S.A. DHANI ....Appellant Through: Mr. K. B. Andly, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus STATE (CBI) * Respondent Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: These two appeals were filed by two accused who were convicted by the learned Special Judge vide judgment dated 29th October, 1999 for the commission of the offences punishable under Section 120-B read with Section 420 IPC and Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,1988 order while accused-appellant V.S.Murthy was convicted individually for the substantive offences under Section 420 IPC and Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,1988 also. Vide order dated 30th October, 1999 p...
indraprastha Power Generation Company Ltd. Vs. Someer Chatterjee and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 09.01.2013 Judgment delivered on:21. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 5266/2011 and C.M. No.10681/2011 (for stay) (arising out of D.I.D. No.24/2009) INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate. versus RAMA KANT SHARMA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Salim Inamdar & Mr. Vedanta Varma, Advocates for the respondent No.1. Mr. Dhanesh Relan & Ms. Richa Kaushal, Advocates for the respondent No.2. + W.P.(C) 5433/2011 and C.M. No.11077/2011(for stay) (arising out of D.I.D No.27/2009) INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate. versus AMARJEET SINGH AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Salim Inamdar & Mr. Vedanta Varma, Advocates for the respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal & Mr. Hem Kumar, Advocates for the respondent No.2/GNCTD. + W.P.(C) 5553/2011and C.M. No. 11347/2011(for stay) (arising out of D.I.D No.26/2009) INDRAPRAST...
Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt Ltd Vs. Sanguine Technical Publishers a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: January 21, 2013 + OMP No.856/2012 DORLING KINDERSLEY (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Akhil Sibal, Adv. with Mr.Alok K.Agarwal & Mr.Ashutosh, Advs. versus SANGUINE TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Rahul, Adv. for Ms.Nidhi Jain, Adv. for R-1 to R-3. Mr.Nikhil Rohatgi, Adv. for R-4. Mr.Saurabh Kirpal, Adv. with Mr.Gurmehar Sistani, Adv. for applicant in I.A. No.646/2013. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.OMP No.856/2012 & I.A.No.646/2013 (filed by applicant Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd.) 1. Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd., the petitioner, has filed the above mentioned petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, called the Act) against the four respondents, namely, Sanguine Technical Publishers and its three partners, M.R.Kamalakar Pandit, Lal.M.Prasad and Dr.D.Ganesh Rao. The said petition was first time listed before C...
Albert Samuel Trikha Vs. the Managing Director, Indian Airlines Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.3682/1996 % January 21, 2013 ALBERT SAMUEL TRIKHA Through: ...... Petitioner Dr. M.P. Raju, Advocate with Ms. Mary Scaria, Advocate. Versus THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDIAN AIRLINES LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Madan Mohan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner, an employee of respondents/Indian Airlines Limited, seeking to impugn the orders dated 18.11.1993, 13.1.1994, 6.4.1994 and other orders especially the order dated 29.5.1995 of the Disciplinary Authority imposing the penalty of reduction of basic pay by two stages in time scale with cumulative effect against the petitioner. The penalty was imposed on the petitioner because the petitioner took the loan for housing purpose, although he already owned a hou...
Commissioner of Central Excise Delhi-i Vs. Balaji Trading Co. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 01.2013 CEAC 5 2013 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE DELHI-I... Appellant versus BALAJI TRADING CO. & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Kamal Nijhawan with Mr Sunit Gaur and Mr Dinesh Patel : None CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It has been filed by the revenue, being aggrieved by the final order No. A/655657/2012-EX (BR) dated 05.06.2012 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in Central Excise Appeal Nos. 260/2012, 292/2012 and 342/2012, whereby the said appeals filed by the respondent were allowed.2. The Commissioner (Adjudication) had passed an order on 31.10.2011, whereby he had imposed penalties of ` 10 lacs on Balaji Trading Company, ` 3 lacs on Pooja Agencies and ` 10,000...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. Bel- Acc (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:21.01.2013 FAO(OS) No.40/2013 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .... Appellant Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Meenakshi Sood, Ms.Padma Priya, and Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Advocates. versus BEL- ACC (JV) Through: .... Respondent Mr.Amit George and Mr.Abin Mathew, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.C.M. No.1122/2013 (for exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. FAO(OS) No.40/2013 & C. M.No.1121/2013 (for stay) 1. A contract dated 01.02.2001 had been entered into between the National Highways Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) and M/s BEL- ACC (JV) (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) wherein the project of strengthening and four laning of the existing two lane sections between 307.500 Km to 321.00 Km of Etawah Bypass on NH-2 in Uttar Pradesh had been awarded to the respondent. The ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »