Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Sharma Vs. Ajay Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 911/2007 SANJAY SHARMA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Arun Khosla with Ms. Shreeanka Kakkar, Advocates versus AJAY SHARMA AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Akhil Sibal with Mr. Narhari Singh, Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Mr Jatin Mongia and Mr. Amit Agrawal, Advocates for D-7/Applicant. Reserved on :15. h January, 2013. Date of Decision:24. h January, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J : I.A. 12964/2012 IN CS(OS) 911/2007 1. Present application has been filed under Section 151 CPC by the defendant no. 7 seeking compensation from the plaintiff by way of restitution in the amount of Rs. 84,000/- per month for the period starting from 22nd May, 2007 till 8th December, 2011.2. The relevant facts of the present case are that on 15 th May, 2007, the plaintiff filed the present suit for partition, rendition of accounts and permanent injunction along with an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC being I.A. No. 586...
Dr. Abha Agrawal Vs. Central Adoption Resource Authority and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2013 WP(C) 2701/2012 DR. ABHA AGRAWAL ......PETITIONER Vs CENTRAL ADOPTION RESOURCE AUTHORITY & ANR. ....RESPONDENTS + WP(C) 3279/2012 PROMILA ANN MASSEY ......PETITIONER Vs CENTRAL ADOPTION RESORUCE AUTHORITY & ORS. ....RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Lalit Trakru and Mr. Karan Thukral, Advocates For the Respondents: Ms.Rita Kaul and Mr. Kapil Kumar, Advocates CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 1.These two matters raise a common question which is: Whether adoptions made directly by the biological parents of a child to another person, without the intervention of the Central Adoption Resource Authority (in short CARA), are valid in the eyes of law? 2. The issue has arisen in the background of the following brief facts, concerning the two writ petitioners before me: WP(C) 2701/2012 2.1 The petitioner, in this case, Dr...
Bhim Singh Bajeli Vs. P.O. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 01.2013 + LPA 611/2003 BHIM SINGH BAJELI ..... Appellant Through : Sh. D.S. Bora and Sh. R.S. Rawat, Advocates. versus P.O.CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL..... Respondent Through : Sh. Jagat Arora and Sh. Rajat Arora, Advocates, for Resp. No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 13.08.2001 whereby the award made in favor of the appellant to the extent it directed payment of 15% interest, was quashed.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the Tribunal under the Industrial Disputes Act (ID No. 169/83) on the question as to whether the employer, i.e. Khadi Gramodyog Bhawan had correctly placed him in the scale, which it had. The appellant claimed that he was entitled to be p...
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 6728/2011 RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD ... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr M. S. Syali, Sr Advocate with Mr V. P. Gupta, Mr Mayank Nagi and Mrs Husnal Syali Nagi For the Respondents : Mr Abhishek Maratha with Ms Anshul Sharma CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the notice dated 29.03.2010 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), whereby the Assessing Officer has proposed to re-open the assessment for the assessment year 2003-04. Earlier, the assessment had been framed under Section 143(3) by virtue of an assessment order dated 28.03.2004.2. The purported reasons for re-opening the assessment for the assessment year 2...
Microsoft Corporation and anr. Vs. Mr. S.K. Das and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
#F-9 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 611/2009 & I.A. 4322/2009 MICROSOFT CORPORATION AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms. Jaya Negi, Advocate versus MR. S.K. DAS AND ANR. Through ..... Defendants None Date of Decision:24. h January, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J : (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, delivery of profits, rendition of accounts, damages etc.2. In the plaint it has been stated that the plaintiff no. 1, Microsoft Corporation is a company organized and existing under the laws of State of Washington, USA. Plaintiff no. 1 is the largest software publisher in the word and its computer software including various operating systems such as Microsoft Windows XP Professional and Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003. Plaintiffs software are popular, famous and renowned throughout the world.3. Plaintiff no. 2 is stated to be a wholly owned marketing subsidi...
Promila Ann Massey Vs. Central Adoption Resource Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2013 WP(C) 2701/2012 DR. ABHA AGRAWAL ......PETITIONER Vs CENTRAL ADOPTION RESOURCE AUTHORITY & ANR. ....RESPONDENTS + WP(C) 3279/2012 PROMILA ANN MASSEY ......PETITIONER Vs CENTRAL ADOPTION RESORUCE AUTHORITY & ORS. ....RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Lalit Trakru and Mr. Karan Thukral, Advocates For the Respondents: Ms.Rita Kaul and Mr. Kapil Kumar, Advocates CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 1.These two matters raise a common question which is: Whether adoptions made directly by the biological parents of a child to another person, without the intervention of the Central Adoption Resource Authority (in short CARA), are valid in the eyes of law? 2. The issue has arisen in the background of the following brief facts, concerning the two writ petitioners before me: WP(C) 2701/2012 2.1 The petitioner, in this case, Dr...
Flight Center Travels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Flight Centre Limited and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 12.2012 Date of decision:24. 01.2013 % + FAO (OS) No.255 of 2012 FLIGHT CENTER TRAVELS PVT. LTD. .APPELLANT Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra & Ms. Sneha Jain, Advs. Versus FLIGHT CENTRE LIMITED & ANR. ....RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Misha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The appellant as plaintiff filed suit for a decree of permanent injunction against the four original defendants restraining them from passing off, rendition of accounts and commencing business under the mark FLIGHT CENTER or a mark/trade style deceptively similar to it which would amount to passing off qua the services being provided by the plaintiff and for rendition of accounts. The appellant alleged in the plaint that it is a reputed travel agency in India and had commenced business under the trading style of M/s. Flight Center Travels...
Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Housing and Urban Develop ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 12.2012 Date of Decision:24. 01.2013 + FAO (OS) No.309 of 2012 ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. B.B. Gupta & Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advs. Versus HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Government of India issued a Letter of Allotment (for short LoA) dated 1.11.1990 in favour of Housing & Urban Development Corporation Limited (for short HUDCO)/respondent herein in respect of a piece of land measuring 42.6 acres at Pinjrapole, Andrews Ganj, now known as HUDCO place for development of a community centre and Government housing. An area of 4,800 sq.mtrs. was permitted to be disposed of out of the said land for construction of a shopping arcade. In view thereof on 26.12.1994 the respondent issued an advertiseme...
M/S Anukampa Solutions Private Ltd Vs. Uttar Pradesh State Road Transp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 113/2010 M/S ANUKAMPA SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Muneesh Malhotra, Advocate. versus UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Bijender Chahar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent, arising out of the Agreement dated 23.11.2006 for constructing, operating, and maintaining (as BOT Project) a food stall at Ajmeri Gate Interstate Bus Terminus, New Delhi for a period of ten years by the Petitioner.2. Shorn of details, the facts leading to the filing of the present petition are as follows. Pursuant to the Agreement dated 23.11.2006 betwee...
Ram Chander Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on :January 15, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : January 24, 2013 + WP(C) 3205/2001 RAM CHANDER ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate and Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chopra, Advocate and Mr.Anuj Tyagi, Advocate and Mr.Sarvpreet S.Chawla, Advocate for R-2, 3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The petitioner was charge-sheeted on the allegation that while detailed for duty at Air India Gate No.3 Departure, Terminal-II, IGI Airport in the intervening night of 11th and 12th August 1994 he had extorted `200/- from Hakim Singh and Jagdish Singh and had permitted them unauthorized entry without any valid tickets held by them into the precincts of the Airport. At the inquiry 10 witnesses were examined by the prosecution.2. Insp.Gayatri Prakash PW-7 deposed that he was on duty ...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »