Delhi Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Aditya Chandershekhar Pandit and Others Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
A.K. pathak, J. Oral: 1. By this petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 petitioners have prayed that the FIR No.273/2010 under Sections 380/498-A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) read with Section 3 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short “the Act”) and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed. 2. Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 married each other in a temple on 18th May, 2007. Subsequently, they got their marriage registered in the Office of Registrar of Marriages, Bandra, Mumbai. At the time of their marriage, petitioner no.1 was a widower; whereas respondent no.2 was a divorcee. Petitioner no. 2 is son of petitioner no.1 from his first marriage. Petitioner no.3 is wife of petitioner no. 2, that is, daughter-in-law of petitioner no.1. Petitioner no. 4 is a friend of petitioner no.1; whereas petitioner nos. 5 and 6 ...
Nat. Inst. of Public FIn and Policy and Another Vs. Presiding Officer ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
1. By the present petition the Petitioner impugnes the award dated 12th April, 2002 directing that the Assistants and Stenographers of the Petitioner are entitled to fitment in the grade of Rs.1640-2900 and revised DA with effect from 1.1.1986 which is revised to Rs. 5500-175-9000 w.e.f. 2.8.1999 as per the undertaking given on behalf of management on 29th October, 2001 and directed to place the workmen in the said grade and pay arrears with effect from 1.1.1986. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that the Petitioner is an Institute established at the joint initiative of Ministry of Finance (in short MOF), Govt. of India, Planning Commission of India and several State Governments. The nature of work, inter alia, carried out by the Petitioner is research and education in the area of public finance etc. The Institute is running on the grants received from MOF and project grants received from other bodies. A memorandum of understanding was entered into between the MOF and Inst...
Vijay Kumar Vs. Mukesh Bhardwaj (Sharma) and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs.3,50,793/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellant Vijay Kumar for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 05.07.2002. 2. The finding on negligence is not disputed by the driver, owner and the Insurer. Thus, the same has attained finality. 3. To appreciate the contention raised on behahlf of the Appellant, it would be appropriate to tabulate the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal hereunder:- Sl.No.Compensation under various headsAwarded by the Claims Tribunal1.Loss of Earning during treatmentRs.18,746/-2.Medical BillsRs. 2,69,047/-3.Future Medical Treatment/SurgeryRs. 30,000/-4.Physiotherapy ChargesRs. 12,000/-5.Special Diet and ConveyanceRs. 6,000/-6.Pain and AgonyRs. 15,000/-Total Rs. 3,50,793/- 4. The following contentions are raised on behalf of the Appellant:- (i) The Appellant underwent seven surgeries. One ...
State (G.N.C.T.) of Delhi Vs. Saqib Rehman @ Masood and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
S.P.GARG, J. Crl.M.A.5649/2011 (delay) The delay is condoned for the reasons as mentioned in the application. The application stands disposed of. Crl.L.P. 234/2011 1. The State has preferred the petition for leave against the judgment dated 02.02.2011of learned Additional Sessions Judge in SC No.24/2010 by which the Respondents were acquitted of the charges for committing the offences punishable under Sections 307/353/186/489(c)/482/120B/34 IPC, under Section 25/27 Arms Act and under Section 3/5 Explosives Act. 2. Case of the prosecution is that in June, 2005, SI Ravinder Kumar Tyagi posted in the office of Special Staff, South-West District, Delhi received a secret information that Masood and Zahid involved in terrorist activities had made their base in Delhi and were about to strike in Delhi, Gurgaon and other satellite towns. This information was recorded as DD No.6 dated 27.06.2005 in the office of the Special Staff. On 01.07.2005 at 10:30 P.M. SI Ravinder Kumar Tyagi on rece...
L.M. Khosla Vs. Thai Airways International Public Company Limited and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
ValmikiJ. Mehta, J. Oral: 1. Issues in this suit were framed way back on 3.11.1997 and an additional issue was framed on 26.10.2010. These issues read as under:- “Issues framed on 3.11.1997:- 1. Whether the continuance of the plaintiff in the employment of defendant was vested and inherent right until the date of superannuation? 2. Whether there is privity of contract between defendant no.2 and the plaintiff? 3. Whether the termination of the plaintiff was as per the terms of contract of employment? 4. Whether the plaintiff was entitled to automatic promotions and revisions of salaries as claimed by him? 5. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages and compensation as claimed alongwith interest and if so at what rate and for which period? 6. Relief. Additional issue framed on 26.10.2010: Whether the defendant is entitled to protection under Section 85 CPC? OPD” In view of the discussion below there is no requirement of evidence and the suit can be disposed of on facts ad...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›