Delhi Court February 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
ishwar Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. REV. P. 675/2009 % Reserved on: 17th January , 2012 Decided on: 8th February, 2012 ISHWAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Pankaj Saroha, PS Nangloi. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA.1. By the present petition the Petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 25th November, 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge upholding the order of conviction of the Petitioner passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate under Sections 304A and 279 IPC. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 4th April, 2009 had sentenced the Petitioner to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 6 months for offence punishable under Section 279 IPC and a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo Simple Imprisonment for five days and Simple Imprisonment for 18 months and Rs. 5000/- fine under Section 304A IPC.....
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Usha and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 30th January, 2012 Pronounced on: 8th February, 2012 + MAC.APP. 455/2004 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L. K. Tyagi, Adv. versus USHA and ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S. P. Verma, Adv. for R-1 to R-5. Mr. Ashutosh Lohiya, Adv. for R-6 to R-7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J..1. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited impugns the judgment dated 09.08.2004 on the ground that it was wrongly saddled with the liability to pay the compensation as the Insurance policy had been cancelled by a letter dated 21.12.2001 before the accident which took place on 01.01.2002. A compensation of ` 6,26,600/- was granted in favour of the Respondents No.1. to 5 for the death of Bhojraj who was aged about 41 years and was working as an Electrician at the time of the accident..2. I would not go into the question of negligence and the amount of compensation as by order dated 27.10.2004 notice w...
Cogent Ventures (India) Ltd Vs. Raj Karan [Through Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P.335/2006 and I.A. Nos.7818, 11180/2006, 3692-3693, 6512/2009, 7301 and 16738/2011 Reserved on: January 12, 2012 Decision on: February 8, 2012 COGENT VENTURES (INDIA) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmay Mehta with Mr. Sumit Attri and Mr. Animesh Rastogi, Advocates. versus RAJ KARAN [THROUGH LRs] ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok K. Chhabra with Mr. Suryajyoti Singh Paul, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 8.02.2012.1. Arbitration Petition No.335. of 2006 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('Act') has been filed by Cogent Venture (India) Ltd. ('CVIL') praying that this Court should appoint an Arbitrator to decide the disputes between CVIL and the Respondent (late) Shri Raj Karan, arising out of an Agreement dated 17th November 2003 between the parties. The petition has been filed through Shri A.D. Bhargava, claiming that he has been authorized by a Board Resolution dated 5th July 2006 to p...
Ashok Kumar Ahuja and anr Vs. Gulab Rai Khanchandani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 08.02.2012. + CM(M) 1438/2011 and CM No. 22420/2011 ASHOK KUMAR AHUJA and ANR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A.C. Bhasin and Mr. Amit Bhasin, Advs. versus GULAB RAI KHANCHANDANI ..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral) 1 Order impugned before this Court is the order dated 16.11.2011 passed the Rent Control Tribunal (RCT) endorsing the finding of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 27.03.2010 whereby the eviction petition filed by the landlord Gulab Rai Khanchandani seeking eviction of his tenant Ashok Kumar Ahuja and another on the ground under Section 14 (1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (DRCA) had been decreed in his favour; admittedly benefit of Section 14 (2) of the DRCA had already been granted to the tenant and this being a case of second default, the ARC had decreed the eviction petition in favour of the CM(M) No. 1438/...
Sh.Sanjeev Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.608/2012 % Date of Decision: 08.02.2012 Sh.Sanjeev Kumar Sharma .... Petitioner Through Mr.R.K.Shukla, Advocate Versus Union of India and Ors. .... Respondents Through Mr.Saquib, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ANIL KUMAR, J. *.1. The petitioner has sought setting aside of the order dated 24th October, 2011 holding that the petitioner was found unfit in the detailed medical examination held in June, 1998 during recruitment to H.C/C.M examination in 1998 and was found fit only in the subsequent medical examination in September, 1998 and, therefore, he was issued appointment letter in the year 1999 instead of 1998 that is by order dated 3rd February, 1999 and no person junior to the petitioner has been promoted to the post of SI (CM) and thus rejecting his representation that he is entitled for seniority from 1998, though an earlier representation in this respect had been reject...
State (Nct of Delhi) Vs. Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : 5th January, 2012 % DECIDED ON : 8th February, 2012 + Crl.A.944/2011 STATE (NCT of Delhi) ....Appellant Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor and Mr.Sanjay Lao, APPs for the State. versus PRAKASH ....Respondent Through : Mr.Vikas Arora, Advocate. Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J..1. The State has preferred this appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 20.08.2009 by which the Respondent was acquitted of the charges of having committed the offences under Sections 376/302/201/436 IPC. (A) Facts :.2. The prosecution case is that on 18.01.2000 at about 3.05 P.M., an entry- (DD) No.38B -was made at police station Hauz Khas. The intimation was that a girl was burnt in a Jhuggi, near Avtar Taxi Stand, Green Park, Arya Samaj Road. It was further alleged that two police personnel, i.e., ASI Badami Lal and Ct. Banwari Lal reached the spot and found Jayant...
Jiwan Ram Gupta Vs. State Thr. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. M.C. No. 2183/2011 % Reserved on: 18th January, 2012 Decided on: 8th February, 2012 JIWAN RAM GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Mr. Ajeet Kumar, Advs. versus STATE THR. CBI ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. P.P. for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA.1. By this petition the Petitioner seeks quashing of proceedings initiated by the Respondent in RC-104(A)/95SPE/CBI/ACB/New Delhi under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (in short PC Act). The facts giving rise to the filing of the present petition are that the Petitioner was arrested in a trap case on 24 th November, 1995. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he was falsely implicated by the then Commissioner, Land Management, DDA as the Petitioner while working as Manager, Land Management, DDA pointed out to the Vice Chairman, DDA wrong allotment of Petrol Pump Site at ...
National Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Ram Rati Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 24th January, 2012 Pronounced on: 8th February, 2012 + MAC.APP. 676/2007 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha Advocate Mr. Vivekanana Rana, Advocate. versus RAM RATI DEVI and ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. WITH + MAC.APP. 98/2012 RAM RATI DEVI and ORS. ...... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate for R-1 and R-2, versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha Advocate Mr. Vivekanana Rana, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J..1. These are two Cross Appeals filed by the National Insurance Company Limited claiming recovery rights against the owner of the offending vehicle i.e. Maruti Car No.DL-2CL-8035. MAC APP 676/2007 and 98/2012 Page 1 of 8.2. Cross Objections registered as MAC APP. 98/2012 are filed by the Claimants to seek enhancement of compensation of ` 1,...
Dharamvir Kataria Through L.Rs Vs. Shyam Sunder Talwar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
$~R-25A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 08.02.2012 + CM (M) No. 1428/2007 DHARAMVIR KATARIA THROUGH L.RS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Senior Adv. with Ms.Jyotika Kalra, Advocate. versus SHYAM SUNDER TALWAR and ORS. ...... Respondents Through : Mr.S.K.Taneja, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Puneet Taneja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral).1. Impugned judgment is the order passed by the Rent Control Tribunal (RCT) dated 02.07.2007 which has reversed the finding of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 16.11.2005. Vide order dated 16.11.2005, the petition filed by the landlord namely Dharamvir Kataria CM (M) No. 1428/2007 Page 1 of 15 (Dead) through his legal representatives seeking eviction of his tenant Shyam Sunder Talwar and Others on the grounds under Section 14 (1)(a)(b) and (c) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (DRCA) had been decreed on the ground under Section 14 (1)(b) of the DRCA; on other grounds, the evi...
Ocean Plastics and Fibres (P) Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 8th February, 2012 + WP(C) NO.11374/2006 OCEAN PLASTICS and FIBRES (P) LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonali Malhotra and Mr. Amit Sanduja, Advocates Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Advocate for DDA. CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J..1. The short point in controversy in this petition is as to whether a writ impugning the order of determination of perpetual lease is not maintainable for the reason of it being open to the affected person to impugn such determination in proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act)..2. This writ petition has been filed impugning the notice dated 21st November, 2005 of the respondent no.1 DDA determining the perpetual W.P.(C) No.11374/2006 Page 1 of 9 lease with respect to the plot No. A-22 Mangolpuri Industrial Area, Phase II, New Delhi ...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »