Delhi Court February 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dharmender Vs. the State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.Rev.P. No. 281/2005 Date of Decision:10.02.2012 DHARMENDER ...... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.P.Sharma, Advocate Versus THE STATE OF NCT DELHI ...... Respondent Through: Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J..1. The petitioner has moved this court under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. He is aggrieved by an order passed by the Ld. ASJ on 2.04.2005 in Criminal Appeal No. 17/2005. Vide this order the Ld. ASJ confirmed the order of Metropolitan Magistrate, sentencing the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months with a fine of Rs. 500/- under Section 279 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year with a fine of Rs. 3000/- under Section 304 -A IPC..2. The facts of the case in brief are that on 5.11.98 the petitioner was driving bus bearing registration no.DL-1PA-1767 from Uttam Nagar and when the bus reached at main Raja Garden chowk, the petitioner hit a cycl...
National Board of Examinations Vs. Ms. Rajni Bajaj and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 30.01.2012 Judgment pronounced on: 10.02.2012 + W.P.(C) 58/2011 NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS ... Petitioner versus MS. RAJNI BAJAJ and ANR. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr J.L. Gupta and Mr Mukul Gupta with Dr Rakesh Gosain, Mr Sanjiv Joshi and Mr Achit Sharma For Respondent No.1 : Mr M.K. Bhardwaj For Respondent No.2 : Mr Sachin Datta for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K. JAIN, J..1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 29.09.2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in M.A. No.2023/2010 in T.A.No.1441/2009..2. The respondent No.1 before this Court, Ms Rajni Bajaj was appointed as a Data Entry Operator with the petitioner National Board of Examinations, vide letter dated 04.07.2002 and was put on probation for a period of two ye...
Dilbagh Singh Vs. Sardare and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV. P. 124/2005 with Crl.M.A.2181-2182/2005 Date of Decision: 10 .02.2012 DILBAGH SINGH ...... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P. Dhanda, Adv. with Mr. N.A. Usmani, Advocate Versus SARDARE and ORS ...... Respondents Through: Mr. I.A. Alvi, Adv. for R-1 to R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J..1. This is a revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C. read with section 401 Cr.P.C. assailing the Judgment and Order dated 25.01.2005 passed in S.C. No. 137/2004 by the Ld. ASJ whereby the respondent no. 1, 2 and 3 were released on probation and respondents no.4. and 5 were acquitted..2. The case of the prosecution in brief was that on 7.7.2000 at about 6pm the petitioner Dilbagh Singh and his father Amar Singh were resting in their fields in village Nangal Thakran beneath a jaal tree. Thereafter respondent no.1. Sardare and his two sons, namely Kasim Ali and Hasim Ali reached there and started cutting the jaal tree, to which the petitio...
Alankit Assignments Ltd Vs. Cdr S.P. Puri (Retd) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 147/2010 Reserved on: January 20, 2012. Decision on: February 10, 2012. ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kshitiz Khera, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Sumeet Batra and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates. Versus CDR S.P. PURI (RETD) and ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Deeptakriti Verma with Mrs. Neha S.Verma, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 10.02.2012.1. The Petitioner Alankit Assignments Ltd. challenges in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('Act') an Award dated 10th December 2009 passed by the learned Arbitrator in the dispute between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 1, Cdr. S.P. Puri, whereby the Petitioner has been directed to return to Respondent No.1. all the shares which were transferred on 28th June 2004 from his account with all incidental benefits such as dividend, bonus shares, rights shares and splitting up of the sh...
Sudershan Lal Maini Vs. Virender Kumar Maini and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 30, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: February 10, 2012 + RFA(OS) No.28/2005 SUDERSHAN LAL MAINI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Hari, Advocate and Mr.Sanjeev Tyagi, Advocate. versus VIRENDER KUMAR MAINI and ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr.R.L.Kohli, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J..1. The dispute in the present appeal is between the family members/legal heirs of Late Sh.Mohan Lal Maini..2. The genealogy tree of family of Late Sh. Mohan Lal Maini is as under:- Mohan Lal Maini I (Krishna Wanti) wife I --------------------------------------------------------------- I I I I I Roshan Virender Sudershan Satish Chander Prabha (Son) (Son) (Son) (Son) (Daughter) I I Meena Ajay (Wife) (Son).3. In the year 1997 the appellant filed a suit against the respondents for partition of three properties bearing Municipal Nos.B-13/A, A-2 and A-4, Kalkaji,...
Asi Jai Chand Vs. Commissioner of Police, Delhi, Police Headquarters, ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
V.K. Bali, Chairman: 1. Sequel to a departmental enquiry, Jai Chand, an ASI (Exe.) in Delhi Police, the applicant herein, has been visited with the punishment of withholding of his three future increments with cumulative effect with immediate effect, vide order dated 14.05.2007 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South District, New Delhi. His suspension period from 22.02.2006 to 19.10.2006 has also been ordered to be treated as not spent on duty for all intents and purposes. The appeal against the order aforesaid has since been rejected by the Joint Commissioner of Police, Southern Range, New Delhi, vide order dated 11.02.2008. It is against these two orders that the present Original Application has been filed by him under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. 2. We may mention at the very outset that the OA would be hopelessly barred by limitation, the same being only one year, as provided under Section 21 of the Act of 1985. There is no application accompany...
Jai Chander Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Cult ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
Dr. Veena Chhotray: 1. The Applicant, working as a temporary status casual labour under the Department of Archeological Survey of India, is aggrieved at non-regularization of his services. By way of relief, the OA seeks directions to the Respondents for regularizing his services from the date his juniors had been regularized with all consequential benefits. 2. The learned counsels Shri Naresh Kaushik and Shri Amit Anand would argue respectively for the applicant and the respondents. 3. The brief facts are that the applicant has been working as a Beldar with the respondents since the year 1985. The engagement of the applicant was as a daily wager. In course of time he was granted the ‘Temporary Status’. In 1994, the respondents framed a scheme for regularization of Casual Labour with Temporary Status and also prepared a combined seniority roll for that purpose. A copy of such a list as revised on 19.5.2003 has been enclosed with the OA as Annex. A/2. In this list the name of...
Ms. Nishu Vs. Commissioner of Police, Delhi Police, Mso Building, Phq, ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A) 1. Ms. Nishu, the applicant herein applied for the post of Constable (Executive) Female in Delhi Police for the recruitment year 2009 (Phase-II), to fill up 211 posts of Temporary Women Constable (Executive). The applicant submitted her application for the said post, appeared in the examination under General Category with Roll No.801333. She also participated in the physical endurance test and physical measurements and having passed the said tests she sat in the written examination. The examination result was declared on 26.04.2010 but the applicant could find her name in the list of successful candidates. Being aggrieved, she sought information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 from the respondents on 02.06.2010 regarding the minimum passing marks in the said examination and the marks obtained by the applicant. It is the case of the applicant that she came to know that the cut off marks for the Female (Exe.) Constable, 2009-II for the Genera...
Rajender Prasad Vs. Union of India Through the General Manager, Northe ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
ORAL: Mrs. Meera Chhibber, Member (J) 1. Applicant has challenged letter dated 12.3.2010 and sought a direction to the respondents to get him medically examined by an independent Medical Board at Dr. R.M.L. Hospital, New Delhi or at Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, or in any other Govt. Hospital as per the Medical requirement of the Railways for the post of Assistant Loco Pilot (hereinafter referred to as ALP) and the case of the applicant may be considered for his appointment to the post of ALP on the basis of the medical report given by an independent Medical Board. 2. The brief facts, as stated by the applicant are in the year 2008 Railway Recruitment Board Chandigarh had invited applications for the post of Apprentices Assistant Loco Pilot had applied for it and was declared successful and sent offer of appointment vide letter dated 25.9.2009 (page 12). Thereafter, he was sent for medical examination vide letter dated 5.11.2009. Applicant was declared unfit in A-1 category (page 13)...
icici Lombard General Insurance Vs. Chanderwati and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 7th February, 2012 Pronounced on: 9th February, 2012 + MAC. APP. No.904/2011 and CM. APPL 18798/2011(stay) ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate Versus CHANDERWATI and ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate for the Respondents /Claimants WITH + MAC. APP. No.906/2011 CHANDERWATI and ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate Versus SURESH KUMAR and ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Insurance Company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT MAC. APP. Nos.904/2011 and 906/2011 Page 1 of 9 G. P. MITTAL, J..1. These are two Cross-Appeals. MAC APP No.904/2011 has been filed by ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the "insurance company") seeking reduction of compensation of `20,49,880/- awarded for the death of Mempal who was aged about 50 years at the time of the accident...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »