Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi Vs. Indovax P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DECIDED ON:19. 12.2012 REVIEW PETITION 154 2012, CM APPL.4744/2012 & 4745/2012 IN ITA 1660/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus INDOVAX P.LTD. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) CM APPL.4745/2012 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.4744/2012 (condonation of delay) In the facts and circumstances of the case, the delay in filing Review Petition No.154/2012 is condoned. CM APPL.4744/2012 is disposed of. REVIEW PETITION 154 2012 After considering the submissions, the Court is of the opinion that matter deserves to be heard on merits. The Review Petition No.154/2012 is accordingly allowed. REV.PET.154/2012 & ITA 1660/2006 Page 1 ITA 1660/2006 1. The question of law urged by the Revenue in respect of its appeal against the order of the ITAT dated 31.3....
Asha Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h September, 2012 Date of Decision:19th December, 2012 % + (1) Criminal Appeal No. 384/2012 ASHA Through ....Appellant Mr. Jitender Sethi and Mr. Rohit Bhargava, Advocates. Versus STATE Through (2) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Criminal Appeal No. 433/2012 ANAND SINGH @ DHAMMAL ....Appellant Through Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate. Versus STATE Through (3) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Criminal Appeal No. 434/2012 ANAR SINGH Through ....Appellant Mr. Sunil Dalal and Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocates. Versus STATE Through (4) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Criminal Appeal No. 443/2012 SHAILENDER @ BABLEY Through ....Appellant Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr. Pawan Mathur and Mr. Vikram Panwar, Advocates. Versus STATE Through (5) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Criminal Appeal No. 455/2012 ASHOK KHATRI & ANR. Through ....Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail and Mr. Vishal Sehijpal, Advocates. Versus STATE Through (6) Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, AP...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shobha Ram Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h December, 2012 + MAC APP. 770/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manu Lav Shahlia, Advocate Versus SHOBHA RAM SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr.Abrar Ahmad Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL .....Respondents & Mr.Shaffiullah, JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant Insurance Company impugns a judgment dated 11.01.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of ` 2,52,400/- was awarded in favour of the First Respondent for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident, which occurred on 06.08.2005.2. The only ground raised at the time of hearing of the Appeal is that the Tempo not HR-38-BG-4803 was not involved in the accident. In any case, there was contributory negligence on the part of the First Respondent and thus, the quantum of compensation is liable to be reduced.3. I have before me the Trial Court record. A joi...
M/S Routes Travel Ltd. Vs. M/S Air Travel Bureau Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19th December, 2012 % + CO.APPL.(M) 194/2012 M/S ROUTES TRAVEL LTD ..... Applicant No.1 /Transferor Company with M/S AIR TRAVEL BUREAU LTD Through ..... Applicant No. 2 /Transferee Company Mr. Amit Goel, Adv. INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion joint Application under sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short the Act) in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation (for short the Scheme) of Routes Travel Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) with Air Travel Bureau Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company). A copy of the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation has been filed as Annexure A- 9 along with the present Application.2. In this Application, details with regard to date of incorporation of Transferor Company and Transferee Company, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been stated. The registered offices of the Transferor Company and Transferee Co...
Mayurdwaj Co-op Housing Society Ltd Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 05, 2012 Judgment delivered on: December 19, 2012 + RFA(OS) No.49/2011 MAYURDWAJ CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Banati, Advocate with Mr.Hari Mohan, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 13th December, 2010 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the suit of the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiff) for recovery of `61,42,790/- was dismissed in favour of the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant).2. A suit was filed by the plaintiff for refund of composition fee which was paid to the DDA by the plaintiff on 25th April, 1997 vide challan produced before this Court and exhibited as Ex.PW-1/14 against the demand ...
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd Vs. Crystal Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:17. 12.2012 Judgment pronounced on:19. 12.2012 CS(OS) 104/2011 RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD Through: ..... Plaintiff None. versus CRYSTAL PHARMACEUTICALS Through : ..... Defendant None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The plaintiff is a large pharmaceutical company and owns several trademarks, including the mark PENTAGESIC, which is registered in its name in Class 5 in respect of analgesic preparations. The plaintiff-company claims the following sale figures in respect of the medicine being sold by it under the name PENTAGESIC:2004 1.16 million 2005 - 1.54 million 2006 - 1.69 million 2007 - 1.48 million 2008 CS(OS) 104/2011 - 2. - 0.71 million It is alleged in the plaint that the defendant is manufacturing and marketing its drug under the registered trademark PENTAGESIC of the plaintiff. The drug being sold by the plaintiff under the name PENTAGESIC is an anti-inflammatory drug used for management of pai...
Cecil Webber Engineering Limited and ors. Vs. ...................
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19th December, 2012 % + COMPANY PETITION NO. 301/2012 Cecil Webber Engineering Limited (Demerged / Petitioner Company1) And Kamdhenu Enterprises Limited (Demerged / Petitioner Company2) And Pavitra Commercials Limited (Demerged / Petitioner Company3) And Mahendra Shipping Limited (Demerged / Petitioner Company4) And Udhyam Merchandise Private Limited (Resulting / Petitioner Company5) Through Mr. Deepak Diwan and Ms. Adarika Ghose, Advocates for the Petitioners Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This joint Petition has been filed under sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by the Petitioner Demerged Companies and Resulting Company seeking sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement of Cecil Webber Engineering Limited (Demerged/ Petitioner Company 1), Kamdhenu Enterprises Limited (Demerged / Petitioner Company 2), Pavitra Commercials Limited (Demerged / Petit...
Union of India and anr. Vs. V.K.Vashisht
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:19. 12.2012 W.P.(C) 5036/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .. Petitioners Versus V.K.VASHISHT .. Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners For the Respondent : Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Amit Chadha and Mr Kunal Kahol. : None. CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner herein, challenges the order dated 07.03.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No.3444/2011, whereby the Tribunal has allowed the OA and directed the petitioners to constitute a review DPC expeditiously to consider promotion of the respondent on the post of Deputy Secretary from the time he was first overlooked by his juniors.2. In brief, facts relevant for the determination of the present petition may be noted. (i) The respondent joined the services of the petitioner as Deputy Field Officer (Tele) in...
ikpal Singh Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 14, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on : December 19, 2012 + W.P.(C) 7099/2012 IKPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by : Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by : Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as a Constable (GD) by CISF and as on January 07, 2011 was posted at CISF Unit, IOC, Panipat, Haryana.2. He was charge-sheeted as under:During posting of Force No.961401920 Const (GD) (Suspended) Ikpal Singh, CISF Unit, IOC Panipat on 07.01.2011 in the third shift at 21:00 hrs till 05:00 hrs was posted for checking at South Gate of PNCP. On the above said that at about 22:00 hrs TATA Sumo not DL-4CF-9016 without gate pass and without any valid permission entered the Unit of PNCP area unauthorizedly being a member of disciplined and armed force No.961401920 C...
Ram Gopal Singh Sisodia Vs. Union of India Through: Its Secretary and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve:21. t November, 2012 Date of Pronouncement:19. h December, 2012. + W.P.(C) 2942/2012 RAM GOPAL SINGH SISODIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.R.K. Kapoor, Adv. with Ms.Shweta Kapoor, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS SECRETARY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC, Mr.Ashish Virmani, Mr.Aditya Malhotra, Mr.Ravjyot, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW : D.MURUGESAN, CHIEF JUSTICE 1 This writ petition in the form of pro bono publico petition has been filed by one Sh.Ram Gopal Singh Sisodia seeking for a direction to issue a writ of quo warranto quashing the nomination of Sh.Sachin Tendulkar as a member of Rajya Sabha (Council of States) as made by the President of India. The petitioner is the Editor-in-Chief of Jan Chetna, a National Weekly Newspaper. He is Ex-Member of Metropolitan Council/Ex- Member of Legislative Assembly, Delhi...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »