Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
L and T General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt.Seema Gupta and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 1295/2012 L & T GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate. Versus SMT.SEEMA GUPTA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) C.M. APPL No.21268/2012(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The Application stands disposed of. MAC. APP. 1295/2012 1. The Appellant Insurance Company impugns a judgment dated 22.09.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `41,21,284/- was awarded in favour of Respondents No.1 to 5 for the death of Ramesh Dutta who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 14.06.2011.2. The finding on negligence is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company; the same has attained finality.3. There is twin challenge to the impugned judgment. First, the compensation awarded is on the hi...
Amarwati and ors. Vs. Tagore International School and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 254/2008 AMARWATI & ORS. Through: Versus ..... Appellant Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate. TAGORE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate for Respondent No.2 the the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.174/2008 titled CHEENA v. TAGORE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ANR 2.For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 20 2012 pst...
Matrix Cellular Services Pvt. Ltd. Through Capt. R Vs. Sanjoy Mukherji ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h August, 2012 Pronounced on:20. h December, 2012 + CONT. CAS (C) 823/2011 MATRIX CELLULAR SERVICES PVT. LTD. through CAPT. RAKESH WALIA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Karan Minocha, Adv. versus SANJOY MUKHERJI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manu Nair, Adv. Mr. Anuj Berry, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. This Petition under section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (the Act) has been filed by the Petitioner Matrix Cellular Services Private Limited (MCS) against the five Respondents, namely, Sanjoy Mukerji, Director, Vodafone Essar Limited; Mr. Rajiv Kohli, CEO (Delhi Circle), Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd.; Mr. Marten Pieters, Managing Director & CEO, Vodafone Essar Ltd.; Shaina Subramanium, General Manager, Vodafone Essar Ltd. and Ms. Monika Pathak, Deputy General Manag...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Ameet Kumar Khandelwal`
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h December, 2012 % + LPA No.624/2012 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. Versus AMEET KUMAR KHANDELWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. N. Kinera, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 07.02.2011 of the learned Single Judge allowing W.P.(C) No.7245/2010 preferred by the respondent and directing the appellant Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to hold a mini draw and allot an MIG flat to the respondent as per the old cost, together with interest as per the DDA Policy.2. The writ petition was filed pleading, i) that the deceased father of the respondent was a registrant with the appellant DDA for an MIG flat under the New Pattern Registration Scheme of the year 1979; ii) he however expired on 14.05.1999, before any allotment was made in his favour pursuant to the said registration...
Sk Gupta Vs. Airport Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h August, 2012 Decided on:20. h December, 2012 % + W.P.(C) 4599/1995 SK GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj and Mr. Romil Pathak, Advocates versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate. AND + W.P.(C) 8789/2007 SANJIVE CHAMOLI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. K.K. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 Both these petitions can be disposed of by a common judgment as the Petitioners herein are aggrieved by the inaction of the Respondents in not implementing the Office Memorandum dated 5th July, 1989 (in short the OM) and granting them pensionary benefits in terms thereof.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that in terms of this ...
Cheena Vs. Tagore International School and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 174/2008 CHEENA Through: Versus + ..... Appellant Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate. TAGORE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate for Respondent No.2 MAC. APP. 187/2008 VIJENDER Through: Versus the the MAC. APP. 191/2008 SURESH & ORS. Through: Versus ..... Appellants Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate. TAGORE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate for Respondent No.2 + the ..... Appellant Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate. TAGORE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate for Respondent No.2 + the the the MAC. APP. 192/2008 PREMWATI & ORS. MAC. APP. Nos.174/2008, 187/2008, 191/2008, 192/2008, 194/2008, 223/2008, 230/2008 & 254/2008 ..... Appellant Page 1 of 19 Thr...
Tirupati Build Plaza Private Limited and anr. Vs. .................... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:20.12.2012 CO. Application (M) 197/2012 IN THE MATTER OF Tirupati BuildPlaza Private Limited Transferor/Applicant Company And Gupta Promoters Private Limited Transferee Company Through Ms. Pooja M Saigal, Advocate INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 This first motion Application has been filed under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, Act), in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation{for short, Scheme} between TIRUPATI BUILDPLAZA PRIVATE LIMITED (hereinafter referred to as Transferor/Applicant Company) and Gupta Promoters Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company). A copy of the proposed scheme is filed along with the Application. 2 The registered office of the Transferor Company are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and is within the jurisdiction of this Court. 3 The Transferor Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Transferee Company. The registered office of ...
Dion Global Solutions Limited Vs. .........................
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:20.12.2012 + CO. PET. 431/2011 In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 And Petition under Sections 100to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 for confirmation of Reduction of Share Capital DION GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED Petitioner/Petitioner Company Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. NPS Chawla and Ms. Simran Sethi, Advocates for the Petitioner Company Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Astt. Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director Mr. Ashish Makhija, Amicus-Curiae INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition and the connected applications have been filed under sections 100- 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short Act) by the Petitioner Company seeking approval of this Court to the proposed reduction of share capital and reserves as resolved by its Board of Directors in the meeting held on 28.05.2012 and also by Membersof the Company on 05.07.2012.2. The registered office of the Petitioner Company is situated within ...
Sanjive Chamoli and ors Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h August, 2012 Decided on:20. h December, 2012 % + W.P.(C) 4599/1995 SK GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj and Mr. Romil Pathak, Advocates versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate. AND + W.P.(C) 8789/2007 SANJIVE CHAMOLI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. K.K. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 Both these petitions can be disposed of by a common judgment as the Petitioners herein are aggrieved by the inaction of the Respondents in not implementing the Office Memorandum dated 5th July, 1989 (in short the OM) and granting them pensionary benefits in terms thereof.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that in terms of this ...
Ram Avtar Vs. Tagore International School and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 194/2008 RAM AVTAR Through: Versus ..... Appellant Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate. TAGORE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate for Respondent No.2 the the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.174/2008 titled CHEENA v. TAGORE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ANR 2.For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 20 2012 pst...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »