Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Perfect Radiators and Oil Coolers Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. ------------- ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
$~A1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:03.12.2012. CO.APPL.(M) 166/2012 IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT OF PERFECT RADIATORS AND OIL COOLERS PVT LTD ..... Applicant/ Transferor Company WITH LLOYD ELECTRIC AND ENGINEERING LTD ..... Transferee Company Through Mr. Balbir Singh and Ms.S. Ramya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion Application under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short Act), in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation (for short Scheme). A copy of the Scheme is filed along with the Application.2. It is stated that the registered office of the Applicant/Transferor Company is situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and within the jurisdiction of this Court.3. Learned counsel for the Applicant Company submits that the registered office of the Transferee Company is situated at Bhiwari, Alwar District, Rajasthan. And that vide an order dated 11/1...
Arpit Arora and ors Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
63 to 71 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + + + + + + + Judgment dated 03.12.2012 W.P.(C) 7503/2012 & CM.19106/2012 W.P.(C) 7504/2012 & CM.19107/2012 W.P.(C) 7505/2012 & CM.19108/2012 W.P.(C) 7506/2012 & CM.19109/2012 W.P.(C) 7507/2012 & CM.19110/2012 W.P.(C) 7508/2012 & CM.19111/2012 W.P.(C) 7509/2012 & CM.19112/2012 W.P.(C) 7510/2012 & CM.19113/2012 W.P.(C) 7511/2012 & CM.19114/2012 ARPIT ARORA & ORS ..... Petitioner MANOJ KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioner MANPREET SINGH ..... Petitioner AKSHIT SHARMA & ORS ..... Petitioner JAISHREE MEENA & ORS ..... Petitioner RUPESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner ESHANT SHARMA ..... Petitioner KAMAL KANT SAINI ..... Petitioner NEHA KARKI & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Malaya Chand and Mr.S.P.Mitra, Advs versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar and Mr.Sradhananda Mohapatra, Advocates for the respondent GGSIPU Ms.Vasundhra Rastogi, Adv. for R-2 in W.P.(C)7503/12 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUST...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kailesh Mandal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
$ 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 563/2012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate. Versus KAILESH MANDAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar Wadhwa, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for reduction of compensation of `4,62,411/- awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the First Respondent (Kailash Mandal) for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 22.06.2009.2. The finding on negligence is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company; thus the same has attained finality.3. There is twin challenge to the impugned judgment. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the compensation of `1,00,000/towards pain and suffering and a compensation of `2,97,411/- awarded towards loss of earning capaci...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Deepak Malhotra and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
$ 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 570/2012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate. Versus DEEPAK MALHOTRA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. B.R. Sharma, Advocate for the Respondents No.1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for reduction of compensation of `3,12,370/- awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Respondents No.1 and 2 for the death of their father Amrit Lal Malhotra, who was aged 66 years at the time of the accident.2. During the inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was established that the Claimants were not financially dependent on the deceased. The deceased was stated to be self-employed; however, no evidence was produced with regard to the deceaseds income. The Claims Tribunal, therefore, took the minimum wages of a graduate(as per qualification of the deceased...
Asi Pale Ram and Others Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Phq, I.P. Esta ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
Mrs. Manjulika Gautam, Member (A) We are dealing with all these OAs by a common order as these are based on identical facts and a common CD. The facts are extracted from OA No. 4097/2011, Pale Ram and others Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Delhi and others. But in the case of OAs No. 62/2012, 940/2012, 941/2012, 1204/2012, 3879/2012, 3937/2012, 3939/2012, 3940/2012, 3941/2012 and 3938/2012, the CD, though also made by Chetan Prakash, is a different one. 2. The applicants in this OA were appointed as Constable in Delhi Police. Departmental inquiry was initiated against them vide order dated 20.03.2009 (Annexure A-1) on the allegation that they indulged in corrupt activities by receiving money from bus operators. Summary of allegations along with list of witnesses and documents was served upon them. The applicants submitted a detailed statement of defence raising the issue of the FSL report and the fact that the CD was tailored one, that the complainant and PW-4 to PW-7 did not appear in...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›