Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Investigation Agency Vs. Wasim Akram Mallik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. A. 1086/2012 Reserved on:20. h November, 2012 Date of Decision:03. d December, 2012 % NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ....Appellant Through Mr. Sidharth Luthra, ASG with Mr. Amit Kumar and Mr. Pranay Agarwal, Advocates. Versus WASIM AKRAM MALLIK Respondent Through Mr. R.M. Tufail with Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J.This order disposes of this appeal under Section 21(1) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (NIA Act, for short) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C., for short) and Article 227 of the Constitution of India, filed by the National Investigation Agency. The appellant is aggrieved against the findings, recorded in the impugned order dated 4th September, 2012 that charges should not be framed under Section 121A/122/123 IPC, against Wasim Akram Malik, the respondent herein. The reasoning, given in t...
Commissioner of Income Tax-i Vs. Convertech Equpments Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
$~27 & 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d December, 2012 + + ITA 669/2012 ITA 670/2012, C.M. APPL. 20042/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Counsel. versus CONVERTECH EQUPMENTS PVT. LTD. Through: Standing ..... Respondent Nemo. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J: (OPEN COURT) The questions of law sought to be urged by the Revenue in these appeals are as follows: ITA 669/2012 (assessment year 2002-03) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was correct in law in deleting the addition of `29,42,534/- made by the assessing officer by disallowing the commission paid by it to its two directors which was not allowable as per Section 36(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? ITA 670/2012 (i) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in law in holding that the reopening of the assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was without jurisdic...
Mahinder Singh Vs. M/S National Council of Educational Reseach and Tra ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No. 733/2012 & CM 1606/2012 Reserved on:13. h September, 2012 Decided on:3. d December, 2012 % MAHINDER SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Niraj Gupta, Adv. versus M/S NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEACH & TRAINING ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.K.Singh, Ms. Deepa Rai, Ms. Reena Chongtham, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 In the present petition the Petitioner impugnes the order dated 4 th January, 2012 whereby the learned Industrial Tribunal permitted the Respondent/ management to allow the application of the Respondent subject to a cost of Rs. 3000/- and permitted it to lead additional evidence to prove the charge against the Petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner relying upon Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Lakshmidevamma (SMT) and Anr. (2001) 5 SCC 43.states that it is now settled that the learned Tribunal has the power to permit the management to adduce fresh evidence if the enquiry i...
Board of Control for Cricket in India (Bcci) Vs. Piyush Agarwal and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: November 30, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: December 03, 2012 RFA(OS) 114/2012, C.M.No.19590/2012 & C.M.No.19768/2012 (Cross-objections) STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Parag Tripathi, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Sidharth Chopra, Ms.Sneha Jain, Mr.Shadan Farasat and Mr.Krishan Mohan, Advocates. versus PIYUSH AGARWAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Gayatri Roy, Mr.Hihanshu Bagai, Mr.Thomas George and Mr.Udit Sood, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. Mr.C.A.Sundaram, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Amit Sibal, Ms.Radha Rangaswamy, Ms.Rohini Musa, Ms.Akhila Kaushik and Mr.Raman Kumar, Advocates for R-3(BCCI) AND RFA(OS) 115/2012 STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Parag Tripathi, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Saikrishn...
Star India Private Limited Vs. Onmobile Global Limited and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: November 30, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: December 03, 2012 RFA(OS) 114/2012, C.M.No.19590/2012 & C.M.No.19768/2012 (Cross-objections) STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Parag Tripathi, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Sidharth Chopra, Ms.Sneha Jain, Mr.Shadan Farasat and Mr.Krishan Mohan, Advocates. versus PIYUSH AGARWAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Gayatri Roy, Mr.Hihanshu Bagai, Mr.Thomas George and Mr.Udit Sood, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. Mr.C.A.Sundaram, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Amit Sibal, Ms.Radha Rangaswamy, Ms.Rohini Musa, Ms.Akhila Kaushik and Mr.Raman Kumar, Advocates for R-3(BCCI) AND RFA(OS) 115/2012 STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Parag Tripathi, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Saikrishn...
Board of Control for Cricket in India (Bcci) Vs. Idea Cellular Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: November 30, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: December 03, 2012 RFA(OS) 114/2012, C.M.No.19590/2012 & C.M.No.19768/2012 (Cross-objections) STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Parag Tripathi, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Sidharth Chopra, Ms.Sneha Jain, Mr.Shadan Farasat and Mr.Krishan Mohan, Advocates. versus PIYUSH AGARWAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Gayatri Roy, Mr.Hihanshu Bagai, Mr.Thomas George and Mr.Udit Sood, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. Mr.C.A.Sundaram, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Amit Sibal, Ms.Radha Rangaswamy, Ms.Rohini Musa, Ms.Akhila Kaushik and Mr.Raman Kumar, Advocates for R-3(BCCI) AND RFA(OS) 115/2012 STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Parag Tripathi, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Saikrishn...
Naveen Garg and ors Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 455/2012 % Judgment reserved on:14. h September, 2012 Judgment delivered on:3. d December, 2012 NAVEEN GARG & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Arora and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocates for MCD. Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Ld. APP for the State/R1. Mr.Arun Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Satish Tamta, Advocate for Respondent No. 3/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the instant petition, petitioners have sought to quash the Crl. Complaint No. 493/2011 dated 06.09.2011, the impugned order dated 12.12.2011 and also to set aside/quash the consequent FIR registered vide No. 394/2011 at P.S.-Pul Prahladpur, under Section 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act r/w Sections 345/461 of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act r/w Sections 406/420/466/467/468/471/ 120-B/34 I.P.C.2. Mr. Rakesh Tikku, ld. Sr. Advocate appear...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kanwarjit Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d December, 2012 + MAC.APP. 610/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. with Mr. Punit Vinay, Adv. versus KANWARJIT SINGH & ORS. Through: Nemo. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.9980/2012 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The Application is allowed. MAC.APP. 610/2012 1. The Appellant Oriental Insurance Company Limited impugns a judgment dated 27.02.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `63,316/- was awarded in favour of the First Respondent for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 21.05.2003.2. The only ground of challenge is that the Appellant Insurance Company proved the breach of the terms and conditions of the policy and was, therefore, entitled to recovery rights.3. The Claims Tribunal dealt ...
Cit Vs. Lakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:03.12.2012 + ITA 1288/2011 CIT Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Versus LAKSHMI SUGAR MILLS CO LTD. Respondent Through: Mr. S.N. Kumar with Mr. K.B. Soni, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. This is an appeal by the revenue, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(herein after called 'the Act') against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No. 3445/Del/2010 for the assessment year 2005-06, whereby the appeal of the Revenue has been disallowed.2. The brief facts of the case are that the Assessee, M/s. Lakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. is a limited company and derives income from manufacturing of crystal sugar and from house property. The Assessee filed its return of income on 25.10.2011 ITA-1288/2011 Page 1 declaring a loss of Rs 28,36,167/- ...
Bhagwan Singh Vs. S.K.Jha and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 12.2012 + CM(M) 1206/2012 BHAGWAN SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. P.C. Dhingra, Advocate. versus S.K.JHA & ORS ..... Respondent Through + CM(M) 1209/2012 BHAGWAN SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. P.C. Dhingra, Advocate. versus S.K.JHA & ORS ..... Respondent Through + CM(M) 1212/2012 BHAGWAN SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. P.C. Dhingra, Advocate. versus S.K.JHA & ORS ..... Respondent Through + CM(M) 1213/2012 BHAGWAN SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. P.C. Dhingra, Advocate. versus S.K. JHA & ORS ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) CM No. 18876/2012 (Exemption) in CM(M) 1206/2012 CM No. 18915/2012 (Exemption) in CM(M) 1209/2012 CM No. 18924/2012 (Exemption) in CM(M) 1212/2012 CM No. 18927 /2012 (Exemption) in CM(M) 12013/2012 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. CM(M) 1206/2012 and CM(M) 1209/2012 and CM(M) 1212/2012 and CM(M) 1213/2012 and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »