Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. Vishwa Jagriti Mission
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h September, 2012 Date of Decision:21. t December, 2012 % + + + + + + + + + ITA 754/2010 & C.M. APPL. No.15650/2012 ITA 773/2010 ITA 775/2010 ITA 1092/2010 ITA 1101/2010 ITA 1103/2010 ITA 1104/2010 ITA 1112/2010 ITA 1124/2010 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Karan Chauhan, Advocate. Versus VISHWA JAGRITI MISSION Through: ......Respondent Mr. N. K. Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajender Singhvi, Mr. Amit Aggarwal and Mr. Anurag Dubey, Advocate for applicant/ interveners. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.These are nine appeals, all filed by Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short). ITA Nos.754/2010, 773/2010, 775/2010, 1092/2010, 1101/2010, 1103/2010, 1104/2010, 1112/2010 & 1124/2010 questions of law were framed by this Court on 21.11.2011 in ITA Nos.754/2010, 773...
N.C.Bakshi and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 06, 2012 Pronounced on: December 21, 2012 + W.P.(C) No. 6260/2010, CM No.12384/2010 & 435/2012 N.C. BAKSHI AND ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. J.S. Bakshi and Mr. A.S. Bakshi, Advocates for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT 1 The petitioners who are two in number, claiming to be members of respondent No. 3 Cricket Association, seek quashing of Approval under Section 25(8) of Companies Act, 1956 for alteration of Articles of Association of respondent No. 3 granted on 17th November, 2009 (Annexure-N) and a mandamus to first two respondents to grant fair hearing to petitioners and to dispose of their Representation of 16th April, 2009 (Annexure-E Colly) alleging that alteration in...
Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 12.2012 W.P. (CRL) 1530/2010 BRIJ BHUSHAN BANSAL Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents WITH + W.P. (CRL) 1531/2010 YATINDRA KUMAR AGGARWAL & ANOTHER Petitioners Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Amit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr P.S. Parmar, Mr N.K. Matta, Mr Satish Aggarwal, Ms Inderjit Sidhu and Ms Jasbir Kaur AND + W.P. (CRL) 44/2011 HIMANSHU KULSHRESTHA Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Shyamila Pappu, Sr Advocate with Mr B.B. Pradhan and Mr A.K. Yadav For the Respondents : Mr A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr P.S. Parmar, Mr N.K. Matta, Mr Satish Aggarwal, Ms Inderjit Sidhu and Ms Jasbir Kaur CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J 1.An interesting question h...
ishwar Dayal Kansal and anr. Vs. Rkbk Fiscal Services Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 292/2006 ISHWAR DAYAL KANSAL & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Plaintiff No.1 in person. versus RKBK FISCAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. .... Defendant Through: Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.K. Seth and Ms. Pratibha Sinha, Advocates. % Date of Decision : December 21, 2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.FACTS 1 The facts leading to the filing of the aforementioned suit for specific performance, declaration and mandatory injunction are that the Plaintiff No.1 Mr. Ishwar Dayal Kansal entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 9th February, 2005 with the erstwhile Defendant Company The Khas Joyrampur Colliery Co. P. Ltd. through its authorised representative Mr. Ramajee Dwivedee, in respect of a Farm House situated at Village Bijwasan, New Delhi together with the easements and appurtenants attached thereto, fixtures, fittings and movable assets, for a total sale consideration of ` 7,35,00,000/- (Rupees S...
Suzuki Motorcycle India Pvt Ltd Vs. Cit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :4. h December, 2012 Date of Decision:21. t December, 2012 % + ITA NO.521/2012 SUZUKI MOTORCYCLE INDIA PVT LTD .... Appellant Through : Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Somnath Shukla, Advs. VERSUS CIT ..Respondent Through : Mr. N P Sahni, sr. standing counsel with Mr. Ruchesh Singh, Adv. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: On 4.12.2012 the following substantial question of law was framed. Whether the Tribunal fell into error in disapproving the method adopted by the assessee in reporting the discounted value of raw material, components and consumable stores as on 31.03.2007.2. The brief facts giving rise to the appeal may be noted. We are concerned with the assessment year 2007-08. The appellant-assessee is a private limited company engaged in the manufacture and sale of motorcycles. In the return of income, an amount of `1,58,70,623/- was claimed as deduction on account of inventory w...
Yashwant Singh Vs. Ashutosh Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on:21. 12.2012 + CS(OS) No.5/2012 YASHWANT SINGH Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Adv. versus ASHUTOSH VERMA Through ..... Defendant Mr. A.K.Srivastava, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Sharma and Ms. Uzma Ashraf, Advs. AND + CS(OS) No.508/2012 ASHUTOSH VERMA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. A.K.Srivastava, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Sharma and Ms. Uzma Ashraf, Advs. versus YASHWANT SINGH AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Adv. AND + CS(OS) No.641/2012 ASHUTOSH VERMA Through CS(OS) Nos.5/2012, 508/2012 & 641/2012 ..... Plaintiff Mr. A.K.Srivastava, Advocate with Page No.1 of 53 Mr. Rahul Sharma and Ms. Uzma Ashraf, Advs. versus SATEESH KUMAR SINGH AND ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prabhat Kumar and Mr. Vivek Agarwal, for D-1 & D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.I.A. No.42/2012 (u/o XXX...
Charanjit Lal Khatri Vs. Secretary General, Rajya Sabha Secretariat an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t December, 2012 % + LPA No.39/2012 CHARANJIT LAL KHATRI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.K. Rao, Sr. Adv. Versus SECRETARY GENERAL, RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sana Ansari, Mr. Sumit Batra & Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 8th November, 2011 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.1857/2011 preferred by the appellant, save for a direction to the respondent Rajya Sabha Secretariat to take a fresh decision on the appellants overall grading in the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) for the period 1 st August to 31st December, 2007 and his overall grading for the entire year 2007, in the light of the observations in the judgment of the learned Single Judge.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the counsels have been he...
Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 12.2012 W.P. (CRL) 1530/2010 BRIJ BHUSHAN BANSAL Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents WITH + W.P. (CRL) 1531/2010 YATINDRA KUMAR AGGARWAL & ANOTHER Petitioners Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Amit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr P.S. Parmar, Mr N.K. Matta, Mr Satish Aggarwal, Ms Inderjit Sidhu and Ms Jasbir Kaur AND + W.P. (CRL) 44/2011 HIMANSHU KULSHRESTHA Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Shyamila Pappu, Sr Advocate with Mr B.B. Pradhan and Mr A.K. Yadav For the Respondents : Mr A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr P.S. Parmar, Mr N.K. Matta, Mr Satish Aggarwal, Ms Inderjit Sidhu and Ms Jasbir Kaur CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J 1.An interesting question h...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S. Dewan Chand Satyapal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :05. 12.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:21. 12.2012 + ITA NO. 1411/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Gayatri Verma and Sh. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Vs. M/S. DEWAN CHAND SATYAPAL Respondent Through : Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Satyen Sethi, Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Ms. Husnal Syali, Sh. Mayank Nagi and Sh. Rahul Sateeja, Advocates. ITA NO. 1541/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Gayatri Verma and Sh. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Vs. DEWAN CHAND SATYAPAL Respondent Through : Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Satyen Sethi, Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Ms. Husnal Syali, Sh. Mayank Nagi and Sh. Rahul Sateeja, Advocates. ITA Nos.1411 & 1541/06 Page 1 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeals are allowed in view of th...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S. Dewan Chand Satyapal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :05. 12.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:21. 12.2012 + ITA NOS. 87/2003 & ITA NOS. 1411/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Gayatri Verma and Sh. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Vs. M/S. DEWAN CHAND SATYAPAL Respondent Through : Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Satyen Sethi, Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Ms. Husnal Syali, Sh. Mayank Nagi and Sh. Rahul Sateeja, Advocates. ITA NOS. 1541/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Gayatri Verma and Sh. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Vs. DEWAN CHAND SATYAPAL Respondent Through : Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Satyen Sethi, Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Ms. Husnal Syali, Sh. Mayank Nagi and Sh. Rahul Sateeja, Advocates. ITA Nos. 87/03, 1411, 1541/06 Page 1 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This judgment dis...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »