Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jag Dev Vs. D.T.C. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 2644/2000 Decided on:7. h December, 2012 % JAG DEV Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Anil Mittal, Adv. Through ..... Respondent Mr. U.N. Tiwari, Adv. for DTC/R-1. versus D.T.C. & ORS. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition is limited to the extent of grant of back wages which has been denied by the Labour Court to the Petitioner. The Petitioner was employed as a conductor with the Respondent in the year 1982. On 1 st September, 1992 a charge-sheet was issued to him on the allegations that on 22nd August, 1992 while he was on duty on bus No. 9823 and his bus was checked by the checking staff at Sona bus stand, it was found that he charged the fare from four passengers but he did not issue the tickets. An enquiry was conducted pursuant whereto the Petitioner was removed from his services with effect from 15th February, 1995. On a dispute being raised a reference was made to the Industrial adjudicat...
Mohan Banerjee Vs. State of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 311/2011 MOHAN BANERJEE ..... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Date of Decision:7. h December, 2012 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : : Mr. Asit Kumar Roy, Advocate Mr. Sachin Chopra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.RFA No. 311/2011 1. This Regular First Appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 24.12.2010 passed by Shri L.K. Gaur, Additional District Judge, New Delhi in Suit No. 384/2010 wherein the suit of the appellant was dismissed on the ground of limitation.2. The appellant had been facing trial since 1990 on the allegation that he used to give false sureties by impersonation on the basis of forged and fabricated documents. The charge had been framed against the appellant, along with other accused persons, by a common order dated 6.5.2005. On 4.10.2008, the appellant/plaintiff was acquitted.3. ...
S.D. Enterprises Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2012 W.P.(C) No.4236/2012 SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avadh Kaushik & Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv. AND + W.P.(C) No.5711/2012 M/S LEGRAND INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Bhagwati Prasad, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Adv. for R-1. AND + W.P.(C) No.10932/2009 S.D. ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv. AND + W.P.(C) No.7030/2010 SUNRISE SPORTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ...
National Institute of Electronic and Information T Vs. Delhi Sc/St/Obc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2444/2011 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Anil K.Khaware, Advocate. versus DELHI SC/ST/OBC MINORITIES, HANDICAPPED FINANCIAL & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (DSFDC) ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Rajesh Bawaja and Ms. Seema Seth, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.IA No.8493/2012 1. By way of the present order, it is proposed to decide IA No.8493/2012 filed by the defendant No.1 praying for condonation of delay in filing the Memo of Appearance as required under Rule 3 of Order XXXVII.2. It is the case of the defendant No.1 that on receiving the summons of the suit on 21.02.2012, the same were sent to different Sections of the defendant No.1/Department to seek necessary opinion in the matter, whereafter the matter was forwarded to Standing Counsel of the defendant No.1 and Memo of Appearance filed on 30.03.2012. It is further stated t...
Ritu Minor Thr. Her Father and ors. Vs. Regional Manager Uttranchal St ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MAC.APP.No.672/2012 Date of decision :7. h December, 2012 RITU MINOR THR. HER FATHER & ORS. .... Appellants Through : Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Adv. versus REGIONAL MANAGER UTTRANCHAL STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT 1 The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of `15,13,000/- has been awarded to the appellant. The appellant seeks enhancement of the award amount.2. The accident dated 30th July, 1999 resulted in grievous injuries to the appellant. The appellant was six years old at the time of the accident. She was going with her parents from Delhi to Almora by bus. The bus stopped at Garam Pani bus stand and all the passengers including the appellant got down. The appellant was standing on the left side of the road when U.P. State Roadways bus bearing UP-02C 682.came from behind and crushed the appellant under its left wheel. Th...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd Vs. Jiya Lal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2012 + MAC APP.1244/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Punit Vinay, Advocate Versus JIYA LAL & ORS. Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL .....Respondents JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant New India Assurance Company Limited impugns a judgment dated 27.08.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of ` 3,85,511/was awarded in favour of the First Respondent for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident, which occurred on 04.08.2004.2. The Claims Tribunal awarded a sum of ` 3,85,511/-, which is tabulated hereunder: Sl. No. Compensation under various heads Awarded by the Claims Tribunal 1. Medical Expenses 2. Special Diet & Conveyance Charges ` 15,000/- 3. Loss of Income ` 19,914/- 4. Pain and Suffering, Inconvenience, Mental Shock, Loss of Amenities ` 25,000/- 5. Loss of amenities in life ` 20,000...
Hcl Comnet Systems and Services Limited and anr. Vs. ----------------- ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:07.12.2012 Company Application (M) No. 187/2012 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (1 OF 1956.SECTIONS 39 & 394 AND IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT HCL COMNET SYSTEMS & SERVICES LIMITED HCLSS/APPLICANT COMPANY-I AND HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED HCLT/APPLICANT COMPANY-II Through: Mr. NPS Chawla and Ms. Simran Sethi, Advocates for the Applicants CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion joint Application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short Act) in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement (for short Scheme) of HCL Comnet Systems & Services Limited and HCL Technologies Limited. A copy of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement is filed along with the Application.2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are within the jurisdiction of this Court.3. Details with regard to ...
Rajasthan Roadways, Alwar Vs. Bhagwan Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. No.645/2005 RAJASTHAN ROADWAYS, ALWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ms.Ritu Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus BHAGWAN SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant Rajasthan Roadways impugns a judgment dated 30.10.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of ` 65,600/- was awarded in favour of the First Respondent for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which took place on 24.07.2000 involving the Appellants bus not RJ-02P-0940.2. As per the case set up by the First Respondent, on 24.07.2000 at about 9.15 am he was travelling in the earlier said bus. When the bus reached in the area of PS Kishangarh, the bus hit a tractor which was going ahead of it. There was a big noise and all of sudden he found his left arm sustained a massive hit. He suffered mul...
Prj Infracon Pvt. Ltd Vs. ----
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
$-29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on:7. 12.2012 % COMPANY APPLICATION NO.(M) 185/2012 + PRJ INFRACON PVT. LTD ..Applicant/Transferor Company Versus ARHAM FINANCE & INVESTMENT SERVICES LTD. ..........Applicant/Transferee Company Through Mr. Rajeev K Goel, Advocate for the applicants. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR 1 Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. This is a first motion joint Application under sections 391 & 394; 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement for (a) Amalgamation of PRJ Infracon Pvt Ltd with Arham Finance & Investment Services Ltd; and (b) Reduction of post merger share capital of the Transferee Company- Arham Finance & Investment Services Ltd. A copy of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement is filed along with the Application.2. It i...
Manjeet Singh Vs. Kailash Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2012
$~ R-98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 659/2005 MANJEET SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate. Versus KAILASH KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Insurance Co. the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `3,87,776/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellant for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 21.08.1997.2. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver; the owner or the Insurance Company; the finding on negligence has attained finality.3. In the instant case, the Appellant suffered fracture of his right arm, right leg and head injuries. On account of the head injuries, the Appellant suffered mild mental retardation. He was declared to have suffered 40% permanent disability by the Medical Boar...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »