Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Vandana JaIn Vs. Shri Sandeep Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
27. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:07. 12.2012 % FAO No. 488/2012 Smt. Vandana Jain Through: ..... Appellant Mr. D.K. Rustagi, Advocate versus Shri Sandeep Jain Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Rajani Chauhan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.C.M. No. 20403/2012 (exemption) Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO No. 488/2012 1. The appellant herein seeks setting aside of order dated 30.10.2012 and 08.11.2012 passed by the Additional Principal Judge in HMA No. 974/2010.2. By impugned order dated 30.10.2012, the application under Order VI Rule 17 read with Order VIII Rule 1A read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC), of the appellant herein, seeking amendment of her written statement and for placing on record certain documents in the petition under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, ...
Smt.Kiran Lata and ors. Vs. Ashok Bhardwaj and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. No.1047/2012 SMT.KIRAN LATA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate. Versus ASHOK BHARDWAJ & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.K.L.Nandwani, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM. APPL No.16510/2012(Delay) 1. Issue notice to the Respondent No.3.2. Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Advocate, appearing on behalf of Respondent No.3 accepts notice.3. There is a delay of 592 days in re-filing the Appeal.4. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay in re-filing the Appeal is condoned.5. The Application stands disposed of. MAC. APP. No.1047/2012 6. Trial Court record has already been received.7. With the consent of the parties, the Appeal is taken up for final disposal.8. The Appellants who were the legal representatives of the deceased Charan Singh seeks enhancement of compensation of ` 3,92,000/awarded by the Motor Accident Claims...
H.J.Consultants Pvt.Ltd. and anr. Vs. Naveen Gupta and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:07.12.2012. CO.A(SB) 101/2012 H.J CONSULTANTS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Appellant Through Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek K. Rao, Adv. versus NAVEEN GUPTA AND ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) Caveat Nos.1230-31/2012 1. Since learned counsel for the caveator has put an appearance, caveats stand discharged. Co. Application No. 2365/2012 (Exemption) 2. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.3. Application disposed of. CO.A(SB) 101/2012 & Co. Application No. 2364/2012 (Stay) 4. This appeal has been directed against the order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 16.11.2012 whereby the application filed by the petitioner (CA No. 523/2012) seeking a dismissal of the petition filed by Naveen Gupta with an additional prayer to initiate proceedings under Section 340 of the Cr.PC against him had been dismissed.5. Record shows th...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Bhagwati Transport Co. and o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.2384/2000 % December 7, 2012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ...... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Salil Paul, Adv. VERSUS M/S. BHAGWATI TRANSPORT CO. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a suit filed by the plaintiff-Insurance Company as a subrogee of the defendant no.3, in whose favour an Insurance policy was issued for the consignment which was transported by the defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Essentially, the suit is under the Carriers Act, 1865 against the Carrier for recovery of amount being the value of the lost goods, and which amount the plaintiff-Insurance Company paid to the beneficiary of the policy viz defendant No.3.2. The facts of the case are that the defendant No.3/M/s. Sony India Pvt. Ltd. is a company which manufactures TV sets and electronic goods. Defendant No.3 purchased from the plaintiff a Multi Transit M...
Sunrise Sports (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2012 W.P.(C) No.4236/2012 SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avadh Kaushik & Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv. AND + W.P.(C) No.5711/2012 M/S LEGRAND INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Bhagwati Prasad, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Adv. for R-1. AND + W.P.(C) No.10932/2009 S.D. ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv. AND + W.P.(C) No.7030/2010 SUNRISE SPORTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ...
Manushi Sangathan, Delhi Vs. Govt. of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM No. 18051 of 2012 in W.P. (C) 4572 of 2007 MANUSHI SANGATHAN, DELHI ..... Petitioner Versus GOVT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Appearance: Ms. Indira Unninayar with Mr. Narayan Krishan, Advocates for Petitioners in WP (C) 4572 of 2007. Mr. Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Addl. Standing Counsel, for GNCTD & Delhi Police. Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Advocate for MCD/Applicant in CM 1805.of 2012 with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 07 12.2012 CM No. 18051 of 2012 (for modification of order dated 2nd June 2012 filed on behalf of the Respondent/MCD) Background 1. This is an application filed by Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) seeking modification of the directions contained in paras 8 and 9 of the order passed by this Court on 2nd June 2012.2. The background to this application is that in the judgment dated 10th February 2010 of the Full Bench of...
Union of India and anr. Vs. Pramod Kumar Bajaj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:07. 12.2012 WP(C) No.7675/2010 & CM 2754/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .. Petitioners versus PRAMOD KUMAR BAJAJ .. Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners For the Respondent : Mr R.V.Sinha, Mr R.N.Singh and Mr A.S.Singh : Mr Shanker Raju. Mr Jai Bansal for Applicant/Impleader. CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner (Union of India) has challenged the legal validity of the order dated 31.08.2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.1469/2010.2. The brief facts giving rise to the instant dispute are enumerated as under:(i) The respondent is a 1990 batch Indian Revenue Service (IRS) Officer. (ii) On 16.12.2009, the respondent while discharging his duties as Additional Director of Income Tax, DTRTI, Lucknow, was arrested pursuant to FIR...
Sony Kabushiki Kaisha Vs. M/S Sony Ceramics and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 12.2012 EX.P. 44/2007 SONY KABUSHIKI KAISHA Through: ..... Decree Holder Ms. Anuradha Sarhotra, Advocate versus M/S SONY CERAMICS & ANR Through: ..... Judgement Debtors Mr B.R. Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. Vide consent decree dated 16.01.2006, the judgment debtors were restrained from using the word Sony or any other word deceptively and/or confusingly similar to the trademark Sony, on the goods manufactured and marketed by them or in relation to their business. The settlement between the parties was recorded in IA No. 482/2006. The Judgment Debtors were granted two and a half months from the date of decree to exhaust the existing stock. The case of the decree holder is that the judgment debtor committed breach of the aforesaid consent decree by JD No.2 selling tiles bearing the mark Sony to its investigator on 18.08.2006 and by displaying the mark Sony and the logo S o...
Ex.Gnr Satyaveer Singh Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : December 7, 2012 + WP(C) 5529/2012 EX.GNR SATYAVEER SINGH ...Petitioner Represented by: Mr.S.R.Kalkal,Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: ...Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The petitioner admits of having been granted annual leave from August 5, 1994 till September 6, 1994, requiring him to join his unit on September 7, 1994. The petitioner admits that he did not report back for duty and remained absent for 40 days till he rejoined duties on October 17, 1994.2. Taking cognizance of the absence the Commanding Officer, as per record produced before us, conducted proceedings pertaining to the hearing of the charge envisaged by Army Rule 22 on October 25, 1994 at 12:15 Noon.3. We find from the record that the petitioner has signed the proceedings and thus the grievance in the writ petition that no ...
Furkan Ahemed Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
$~R-5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 142/2011 Judgment reserved on 26th November, 2012 Judgement delivered on 7th December, 2012 % FURKAN AHEMED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. O.D. Sharma, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.1. By way of present appeal appellant has assailed the judgment dated 19th November, 2010 and order on sentence dated 30th November, 2010 passed by the trial court whereby he has been convicted under Sections 376 and 506 IPC; sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with fine of `50,000/- out of which `40,000/- has been directed to be paid to the prosecutrix, if deposited and remaining `10,000/- to go to the State, in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months; sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of `2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »