Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Saira Bano and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 599/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SAIRA BANO & ORS. Through + ...... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R-1 to R-5. Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-9. MAC. APP. 1003/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SAIRA BANO & ORS. Through + ...... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R-1 to R-5. Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-9. MAC. APP. 1007/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SAIRA BANO & ORS. Through + ...... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R-1 to R-5. Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-9. MAC. APP. 27/2012 SAIRA BANO & ORS. Through: MAC. APP. 599/2011 Etc. ..... Appellants versus + NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS..... Respondents Through Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-5. MAC. APP. 28...
United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Dr. Jia Lal Prashar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + MAC.APP. 513/2009 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ... Appellant Through: Mr. Shivali Bansal, Adv. versus DR. JIA LAL PRASHAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. Kanwal Sapra, Adv. for R-1 & R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for reduction of compensation of `44,83,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Respondents No.1 & 2 for the death of Himanshu Prashar, who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 13.05.2002.2. The finding on negligence is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company; thus the same has attained finality.3. The Claims Tribunal by impugned judgment held that the deceased Himanshu Prashar was a final year student pursuing B.E. Industrial Production Engineering from BVB College of Engineering and Technology, Hubli. The Claims Tribunal referred to the testimony ...
New India Assurance Company Ltd Vs. Saira Bano and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 1003/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SAIRA BANO & ORS. Through ...... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R-1 to R-5. Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP. 599/2011 titled NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SAIRA BANO & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 10 2012 vk...
New India Assurance Company Ltd Vs. Saira Bano and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 1007/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SAIRA BANO & ORS. Through ...... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R-1 to R-5. Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP. 599/2011 titled NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SAIRA BANO & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 10 2012 vk...
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Balbir Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + CM (M) No.874/2011 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.N. Aggarwal, Adv. versus BALBIR SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. S.S. Gautam, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The short question that arises for determination in this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is whether the Petitioner would be under obligation to pay the interest even after deposit of the cheque of the award amount with the Claims Tribunal, if notice of deposit was not given by the Petitioner, who was the judgment debtor before the Claims Tribunal.2. It is admitted case of the parties that an award of `1,44,000/- along with interest @ 12% per annum for a period of seven years till the date of the award, that is, 11.07.1995 and with interest @ 18% per annum, if there was default in the payment of amount within 30 days from the d...
Chaman Lal @ Kake Vs. State (Govt. of N.C.T.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h September, 2012 DECIDED ON :10. h December, 2012 + CRL.A.835/2011 CHAMAN LAL @ KAKE ....Appellant Through : Mr.Naveen Gaur, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T.) Through : Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. .Respondent CORAM: MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.744/2011 titled Manoj Kumar Vs. The State. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE (SANJIV KHANNA) JUDGE December 10, 2012...
Jaspal Singh Vs. Shruti Fastners Pvt. Ltd.and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
-* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. 12.2012 CS(OS) No. 767/2010 GURDEV SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Kusum Sanchi, Adv. versus SHRUTI FASTNERS PVT. LTD.& ANR .....Defendants Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv.with Mr. Durgesh, Ms. Rama Yadav and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates And + CS(OS) No. 768/2010 JASPAL SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Kusum Sanchi, Adv. versus SHRUTI FASTNERS PVT. LTD.& ANR .....Defendants Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv.with Mr. Durgesh, Ms. Rama Yadav and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) IA No.723/2012 (under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) Code of Civil Procedure for leave to defend by defendants in CS(OS) No. 767/2010 And IA No.541/2012 (under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) Code of Civil Procedure for leave to defend by defendants in CS(OS) No. 768/2010 1. The plaintiff in CS(OS) No.767/2010 Mr. Gurdev Singh as also the plaintiff in CS(OS) No.768/2010 namely Mr. Jaspal Singh were emp...
The New India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Surjeet Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + MAC APP 239/2012 .... Appellant THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. K.K. Bhat, Adv. versus SURJEET KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jitender Saini, Adv. with Mr. Tanveer Ahmed, Adv. for R-3 & R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant New India Insurance Company Limited seeks recovery rights against the driver and owner of the Tyota Qualis not DL-7CA-9723 involved in the accident on the ground that the insured committed willful breach of the terms and conditions of the policy as he permitted Respondent No.3 (Ajay Kumar Gupta) to drive the offending vehicle without a valid driving licence.2. On inquiry before the Claims Tribunal it was found that the driving licence held by Respondent No.3 was found to be fake.3. The quantum of compensation is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company.4. While dealing with the issue of liabil...
M/S Bhagwan Dass Khanna Jewellers Vs. Bhagwan Das Khanna Jewellers Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: November 22, 2012 Judgment pronounced on: December 10, 2012 I.A.No.6779/2008 in CS(OS) No.1061/2008 M/S BHAGWAN DASS KHANNA JEWELLERS ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Pravin Anand, Adv. with Mr. Shantanu Sahay and Ms. Jaya Negi, Advs. versus BHAGWAN DAS KHANNA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashok Chhabra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the pending interim application being I.A. No.6779/2008 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC. The plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of as well as dilution of trademarks, delivery up, rendition of accounts of profits, damages etc.2. The case of the plaintiff is that M/s Bhagwan Dass Khanna Jewellers is a partnership firm registered in the year 1992. The said firm has been carrying on b...
Star Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Adaab Hotels Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:06. 12.2012 Judgment pronounced on:10. 12.2012 CS(OS) No. 1638/2012 STAR RESTAURANT PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Tara Ganju, Ms. Prachi Vashist, Ms. Preeti Gupta and Ms. Etti Sharma, Advs. versus ADAAB HOTELS LTD. & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Rana, Ms. Priya Adlakha and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advs. AND CS(OS) No. 3230/2012 ADAAB HOTELS LTD. & ORS. Through: ..... Plaintiff s Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Rana, Ms. Priya Adlakha and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advs. Vs. STAR RESTAURANT PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Tara Ganju, Ms. Prachi Vashist, Ms. Preeti Gupta and Ms. Etti Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.IA No.16041/2012 (under Order 39 Rule 1&2 CPC), IA No.11565/2012 (under Section 151 CPC) &IA No.11566/2012 (under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC) in...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »