Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Saurabh Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S Aster Technologies Pvt Ltd and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CS(OS) No. 2498/2012 10th December, 2012 M/S SAURABH BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Umesh Shandilya, Adv. versus M/S ASTER TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this judgment I am decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/landlord filed for possession and mesne profits qua the relief of possession under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC.2. This suit is filed by the plaintiff/landlord for recovery of possession, arrears of rent and mesne profits. The suit premises are 71/5, Shivaji Marg, Najafgarh Road, New Delhi-110015 admeasuring a total of 4156 sq.ft. Plaintiff is the subsequent purchaser of the suit premises and original landlord/erstwhile owner was M/s. Delhi Floorings Pvt. Ltd. Though the plaintiff claims the document of purchase as a Sale Deed dated 29th December, 2009, however, this docum...
Sh. Ravinder Singh Vs. Sh. Deepesh Khorana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.C. Rev. No.3/2011 Date of Decision:10. 12.2012 SH. RAVINDER SINGH ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Milan Malhotra, Adv. Versus ...Respondent SH. DEEPESH KHORANA Through: Mr. Rajat Malhotra & Mr. Deepesh Khorana, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This petition is being field under Sec. 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act against the impugned order dated 13.10.2010, whereby the Ld. ARC dismissed the leave to defend application in Eviction Petition No. 17/2009, filed by the petitioner herein. The brief facts giving rise to this petition are as follows.2. The petitioner herein is the tenant in respect of a shop admeasuring 7ft X 10ft, in the ground floor of property bearing No. 89, Moti Nagar, New Delhi. In 2009, the landlord, who is the respondent herein, filed petition for eviction of the suit shop, claiming that it was required bona fide by the respondent for his 29 year old unmarried son who wants to open a computer busin...
Gurdev Singh Vs. Shruti Fastners Pvt. Ltd.and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
-* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. 12.2012 CS(OS) No. 767/2010 GURDEV SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Kusum Sanchi, Adv. versus SHRUTI FASTNERS PVT. LTD.& ANR .....Defendants Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv.with Mr. Durgesh, Ms. Rama Yadav and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates And + CS(OS) No. 768/2010 JASPAL SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Kusum Sanchi, Adv. versus SHRUTI FASTNERS PVT. LTD.& ANR .....Defendants Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv.with Mr. Durgesh, Ms. Rama Yadav and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) IA No.723/2012 (under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) Code of Civil Procedure for leave to defend by defendants in CS(OS) No. 767/2010 And IA No.541/2012 (under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) Code of Civil Procedure for leave to defend by defendants in CS(OS) No. 768/2010 1. The plaintiff in CS(OS) No.767/2010 Mr. Gurdev Singh as also the plaintiff in CS(OS) No.768/2010 namely Mr. Jaspal Singh were emp...
Raman NaraIn Shah Vs. Govt of Nct Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 12.2012 W.P.(C) 7611/2012 RAMAN NARAIN SHAH ..... Petitioners versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the Petitioners For the Respondent : Ms Sumedha Sharma : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Ms Richa Kaushal for R-1 & R-2 CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.(ORAL) CM No.19305/2012 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 7611/2012 1. The order dated 22.11.2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) in O.A. No.3939/2010 is under challenge in this writ petition.2. The petitioner had filed the said original application in which he had made the following prayer:8. RELIEF SOUGHT: PRAYER:- It is, therefore, most respectfully and humbly prayed that this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to:(i) (ii) Set aside Order No.15...
Manish @ Monu Vs. the State (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h September, 2012 DECIDED ON :10. h December, 2012 + CRL.A.687/2011 & CRL.M.A.15630/2012 MANISH @ MONU Through : ....Appellant Mr.Siddhartha Singh Ranghuvanshi, Advocate with Mr.A.P.S.Jadaun, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Through : Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. .Respondent CORAM: MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal stands disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.744/2011 titled Manoj Kumar Vs. The State. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE (SANJIV KHANNA) JUDGE December 10, 2012...
Saira Bano and ors. Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 28/2012 SAIRA BANO & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS..... Respondents Through Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP. 599/2011 titled NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SAIRA BANO & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 10 2012 vk...
MobIn Vs. Kausar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d December, 2012 Pronounced on:10. h December, 2012 + R.P.691/2012 in CM(M) No.1196/2012 MOBIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.D. Ansari, Advocate Versus KAUSAR ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of this Petition, the Petitioner seeks review of the order dated 05.11.2012 passed by this Court whereby the Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 31.10.2012 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal(the Lower Appellate Court) was dismissed.2. The Petitioners grievance is that the Appellant never got an opportunity to prove that the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958(the Act) has not been extended to the area where the suit property is situated and this Court erred in holding that the Petitioner had an opportunity to plead and prove this fact during the trial.3. An Eviction Petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act was filed by the Responden...
Dtc Vs. Mahinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 2914/2001 Decided on:10. h December, 2012 % DTC ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Arati Mahajan Shedha, Adv. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M. Taiyab Khan, Adv. versus MAHINDER SINGH Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Costs of Rs.5000/- has been paid to Respondent No.2 in Court today.2. By the present petition, the Petitioner impugns the award dated 24 th May, 2000 passed by the learned Labour Court in ID-498/87 whereby the learned Labour Court held that the services of the workman/Respondent No.2 herein were terminated illegally and unjustifiably without proof of charges by the management and directed reinstatement with continuity of service. However, in view of the fact that the Respondent was equally responsible for prolonging the litigation since 1991, he was only awarded 50% of the back wages during the intervening period of termination and till reinstatement.3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contends th...
Kalakriti Engineers India Limited and ors. Vs. ...................
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:10.12.2012 COMPANY PETITION NO.386 OF 201.IN THE MATTER OF: Kalakriti Engineers India Limited ... Transferor Company No. 1 Kalakriti Infratrade Private Limited Transferor Company No. 2 First Realtrade Private Limited ... Transferor Company No. 3 Richi Look Marketing Private Limited ... Transferor Company No. 4 Swami Foods Limited ... Transferor Company No. 5 Jagriti Tradecon Private Limited ...Transferor Company No. 6 MK Realtrade Private Limited Bholeyji Infratrade Private Limited Three-D Food and Beverages Private Limited Exclusive Agencies Limited Co. Pet. 386/2012 ...Transferor Company No. 7 ...Transferor Company No. 8 ...Transferor Company No. 9 ...Transferor Page 1 of 13 Company No. 10 Sauda Securities Private Limited ...Transferor Company No. 11 Aakash Infratrade Private Limited ...Transferor Company No. 12 Ahead Enterprises Limited ...Transferor Company No. 13 Arambh Tradecon Private Limited ...Transferor Company No...
Manoj Kumar Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h SEPTEMBER, 2012 DECIDED ON :10. h DECEMBER, 2012 + CRL.A.744/2011, CRL.M.B.816/2012 & CRL.M.A.7175/2012 MANOJ KUMAR Through : THE STATE Through : + ....Appellant Mr.Rajat Aneja and Ms.Sumati Jumlani, Advocates. versus .Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. CRL.A.835/2011 CHAMAN LAL @ KAKE ....Appellant Through : Mr.Naveen Gaur, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T.) Through : Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. + .Respondent CRL.A.687/2011 & CRL.M.A.15630/2012 MANISH @ MONU Through : ....Appellant Mr.Siddhartha Singh Ranghuvanshi, Advocate with Mr.A.P.S.Jadaun, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Through : Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Manoj Kumar (A-1), Chaman Lal @ Kake (A-2) and Manish Kumar @ Monu (A-3) have preferred the appeals against the judgment dated 11.03.2011 and order on sentence dated 16.03.2011 of Addl.Sessions Judge in SC No.21/2009 by wh...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »