Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms.Akta Gulati and Others Vs. National Capital Territory of Delhi and ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
Sudhir Kumar, Member (A): These 6 OAs were clubbed for the purposes of hearing together, and, therefore, are being decided through a common order. For the purpose of convenience, the facts may be described on the basis of the OA 3997/2011. OA 3997/2011 2. The applicant has submitted that she had been performing the duties as Staff Nurse with the Respondent No.3 as a contractual employee since 2005 without any complaint whatsoever. Thus, she has claimed that she has attained the status of a permanent employee, though treated as contractual employee, on account of the nature of her appointment. All of sudden, without issuing any notice to her, and without asking for any explanations, the Respondent No.3 removed/terminated her services on 16.05.2011, though vacancies requiring her to perform duties in the hospital were still existing. After such removal/termination, the applicant made a representation dated 18.05.2011 through Annexure P-1 (page-24 of the OA), requesting the respondents to...
Narender Kumar Manchanda and anr. Vs. Hemant Kumar Talwar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.C.REV. 107/2012 Date of Decision:10. 12.2012 NARENDER KUMAR MANCHANDA & ANR. Petitioner Through: Ms.Amrit Kaur Oberoi, Ms.Kanica Sabharwal, Adv. Versus HEMANT KUMAR TALWAR Through: Respondent Mr.Diwan Singh Chauhan, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. This revision petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act) impugns the order dated 25.11.2011 of the Commercial Civil Judge-cum-Addl. Rent Controller (Central), Delhi, whereby the leave to defend application filed by the petitioners in the eviction petition filed against them by the respondent, was dismissed.2. The petitioners are the tenants in one shop measuring 8 x 20 in property No. 5319, Hardhayan Singh Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi under the respondent. Their eviction was sought on the ground of bona fide requirement of the suit shop by the respondent for himself and for his son, who had become major and wanted to set up a busi...
Sugen Inc and ors. Vs. a Rao and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: + 10th December, 2012 CS(OS) 1866/2012 SUGEN INC & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Adv. with Mr.PravinAnand, Mr. S. Ghoshal andMr.Aditya Gupta, ADvs. versus A RAO & ANR ..... Defendants Through Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. withMr. C. Mukund, Mr. P.V. Saravana Raja, Ms.EktaBhasin and Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR IA No. 21628/12 1. This order shall dispose of the application filed by the plaintiffs under Section 151 CPC of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, whereby the plaintiffs seek direction to formally vacate the abeyance orders dated 9th November, 2012 and 26th November 2012 and restore the ex parte ad interim injunction order dated 22nd June, 2012 passed by this Court and also direct defendant No.2 to recall the stock of its infringing products which infringe the patent No. 209251 including stocks of products containing the pharmaceutical compound SU...
Amit Khera Vs. Mcd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
48 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 441/2012 % Judgment dated 10.12.2012 AMIT KHERA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjay Rastogi, Advocate versus MCD Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Shobha Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Pleadings in the matter are complete. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the present petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. The facts to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition are that father of the petitioner (late Sh.Banarsi Dass) was in the trade of supplying milk in Delhi for more than four decades and was running a dairy from his residential address. It is the case of the petitioner that as per the Government policy it was directed to shift the diary business from residential colonies. The petitioner's father was allotted a plot free of cost being plot not A-187 Ghauroli Dairy, as per the demand collection register of 1976, his name was recorded at serial No.107 in f...
VipIn Kumar Vs. the State of the Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
$~24 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1008/2010 % Decided on 10th December, 2012 VIPIN KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Adv. versus THE STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent : Ms. Fizani Husain, APP AND CRL. A. 1009/2010 NITIN KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Anup Bhambhani and Ms. Nisha Bhambhani, Advs. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through ..... Respondent : Ms. Fizani Husain, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellants have been convicted under Sections 392/397/394 IPC; sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine of `2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand Only) each under Sections 392/34 IPC and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for one month; sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of `2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand Only) each under Sections 397/34 IPC and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for one mont...
Adaab Hotels Ltd. and ors. Vs. Star Restaurant Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:06. 12.2012 Judgment pronounced on:10. 12.2012 CS(OS) No. 1638/2012 STAR RESTAURANT PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Tara Ganju, Ms. Prachi Vashist, Ms. Preeti Gupta and Ms. Etti Sharma, Advs. versus ADAAB HOTELS LTD. & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Rana, Ms. Priya Adlakha and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advs. AND CS(OS) No. 3230/2012 ADAAB HOTELS LTD. & ORS. Through: ..... Plaintiff s Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Rana, Ms. Priya Adlakha and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advs. Vs. STAR RESTAURANT PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Tara Ganju, Ms. Prachi Vashist, Ms. Preeti Gupta and Ms. Etti Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.IA No.16041/2012 (under Order 39 Rule 1&2 CPC), IA No.11565/2012 (under Section 151 CPC) &IA No.11566/2012 (under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC) in...
Vivek Kumar and ors. Vs. Kamlesh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + MAC.APP. 435/2012 VIVEK KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. versus KAMLESH & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. By virtue of this Appeal, the Appellant, who is the owner of the vehicle not DL-1YA-8168 involved in the accident prays for setting aside of the impugned order dated 05.01.2012 to the extent, the recovery rights were granted against him.2. I have before me the Trial Court record. The learned counsel for the Appellant has taken me through the written statement filed by Respondents No.1 and 2 (before the Claims Tribunal) and the Appellants herein. Para 3 of the written statement is extracted hereunder:3. That in view of the preliminary objections the petition of the petitioners deserves dismissal out rightly as against the answering respondent no.1 and 2 with cost of th...
M/S. Bell Polymers and ors. Vs. Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : November 30, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on : December 10, 2012 + RFA(OS) 112/2012 M/S. BELL POLYMERS & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Sachdeva, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rishi Maheshwari, Ms.Priyam Mehta, and Mr.Abhimanyu Chopra, Advocates. versus PRADESHIYA INDUSTRIAL & INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF U.P. LTD. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sandeep Agarwal, and Mr.K.A.Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.RFA(OS) No.112/2012 1. The appellant No.1, M/s.Bell Polymers and its two partners and the legal heirs of the third partner i.e. all the appellants have suffered a decree against them requiring them to pay to the respondent `1.5 lakhs for a period of eight months commencing from April 1992, and thereafter `2 lakhs per month till when the suit was filed on April 06, 1996 after adjusting `3.4 lakhs paid by appellant No.1 t...
Smt. Anita Rani and ors. Vs. Sh. Dharamvir and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 1166/2011 SMT. ANITA RANI & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. O.P. Mannie, Adv. versus SH. DHARAMVIR & ORS. Through ...... Respondents Ms. Barkha Babbar, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Since Respondents No.2 and 3, owners of the offending vehicle are appearing and the finding on negligence has not been challenged, service of Respondent No.1 is dispensed with.2. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `6,27,820/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellants for the death of Kapil Verma, a bachelor who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 18.12.2008.3. The finding on negligence has not been challenged by the Respondents, thus, the same has attained finality.4. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal it was claimed that the deceased Kapil Verma was in private service ...
Saira Bano and ors. Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 27/2012 SAIRA BANO & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS..... Respondents Through Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP. 599/2011 titled NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SAIRA BANO & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 10 2012 vk...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »